p class="calibre1" aid="11">
If numbers are the language of the Universe, what are they saying to
you ?
Do you wake up every night and see 11:11 on the clock? Or 3:33? 4:44?
Does the same number sequence seem to appear throughout your life
over and over? Did you know that millions of people all over the world
experience the same phenomenon?
These mysterious number sequences, known as “time prompts”—which
we encounter regularly—seem like pure coincidence. But what if they
are actually messages from a higher source, like angels, guides, or even
the Universe itself, urging you to pay attention to something important?
This book explores the many theories about what these number
sequences are:
The newest speculation behind time prompts as messages from a
higher intelligence and their spiritual and metaphysical meanings
The science behind synchronicities, coincidences, and the
mathematical nature of reality
The archetypal symbolism of numbers and what they mean for you
“If you ever wondered about the repeated number sequences you see
and what they might be trying to tell you, Jones and Flaxman take you
on a roller-coaster ride through the levels of mind and consciousness.”
—Chellie Campbell, author of The Wealthy Spirit and Zero to
Zillionaire
“It’s all here, and it all begins with paying attention and noticing when
the clock reads 11:11.”
—Amy Leigh Mercree, medical intuitive, and bestselling author of A
Little Bit of Meditation Marie D. Jones is the bestselling author of
sixteen books. She has appeared on the History channel’s Ancient Aliens
and Nostradamus Effect television series. Visit her at
www.mariedjones.com.
Larry Flaxman is the bestselling author of nine books. He has appeared
on the Discovery channel’s Ghost Lab and the History channel’s
Ancient Aliens and Time Beings. Visit him online at www.
larryflaxman.com.
www.redwheelweiser.com
US$16.95
NEW
PAGE
11-11 cv mx.indd 1
8/27/19 4:02 PM
Praise for
“See 11:11 all the time? How about 333 or 444? These enigmatic time
prompts or number sequences are the language of the universe, speaking to
you all the time. But do you understand why they are so important, what
they are trying to tell you, and how the brain actually processes numbers and
number symbols?
The answers to these and more questions will surprise you. This book covers
the mysterious world of numbers and what they might be trying to tell us—
individually, and collectively.”
—Joshua P. Warren, TV personality and author of Use the Force
“Is it happening to you? You wake up at night, look at the clock, and notice
that it is 11:11 p.m. It happens repeatedly, and you think it is a coincidence,
but then you start to discover that it is happening to others all around the
world, and you wonder. Reports of people noticing strange and repeated
associations with the number eleven are on the rise, prompting theories
connecting this phenomenon with the advent of the new Mayan calendar.
But it’s not just the number eleven that is showing up in people’s lives; it is
often accompanied by unusual events or profound insights. Mysterious
numbers and strange sequences appear throughout the history of human
experience. What do they mean? What secrets do they keep? Are these
wake-up calls to a higher state of consciousness?
In this fascinating new work, will explore the mysteries of 11:11 and the
many other ways in which numbers compose the very foundation of our
reality.”
—Atherton Drenth, author of The Intuitive Dance
“ is a splendid compilation offering insight into the spiritual and scientific
aspects of numbers. As an intuitive medium and number enthusiast, I
wholeheartedly believe that Spirit provides the perfect message at the perfect
time via the perfect messenger, and many times these messages are in the
form of numerical sequences. Fulfilling my own fascination with numbers,
Marie D. Jones and Larry Flaxman’s book is truly impressive and will leave
you enthralled.”
—Shelly Wilson, author of 28 Days to a New You, Connect to the You
Within, and Journey into Consciousness
“Get ready for a new appreciation of the mystical, magical world of numbers
as Jones and Flaxman take you on a rollercoaster ride through the workings
of the brain, the levels of mind and consciousness, even the deep and murky
world of arche types. The universe, God, angels, higher source, or whatever
you choose to call it is speaking to you all the time via number sequences
and synchronicities, but as the authors warn, you must pay attention to see
and understand the messages. covers every aspect of why numbers are the
highest form of communication between our normal waking state and
elevated levels of awareness that can help us live a better life.”
—Kac Young, PhD, author of The Art of Healing with Crystals
“In this digital age, we are literally enveloped by numbers, and, not
surprisingly, the eternal fascination with numbers is stronger than ever.
Marie D. Jones and Larry Flaxman provide an invaluable primer on the
intriguing history and meaning of numbers, the lore of mystical numerology,
time synchronicities, sequences, ratios, codes, Pythagorean secret societies,
sacred geometries, and much else. Absolutely a fascinating read guaranteed
to leave you counting for more!”
—Robert M. Schoch, PhD, author and editor of books including The
Parapsychology Revolution and Pyramid Quest
“ is a fun, fast-moving, informative discussion of numbers as both spiritual
and scientific concepts and of the fundamental significance of numbers as
they have been viewed throughout the ages of humanity.
I recommend it as a thoroughly enjoyable read, after which you may never
look at numbers the same way again.”
—Laird Scranton, author of The Science of the Dogon and Sacred Symbols
of the Dogon
“A beautifully written exploration of digital synchronicity and the sacred
mysteries encoded in numbers. As someone who struggles with dyscalculia
(numerical dyslexia), I appreciate how the authors explain complex
mathematical concepts so that even a lay person like myself can understand
them. Bravo!”
—Laurie Nadel, PhD, psychotherapist and author of The Five Gifts
“If you’ve ever seen repeated number sequences and wondered what they
were trying to tell you, Jones and Flaxman offer a comprehensive guide to
both the scientific and spiritual aspects of these mysterious time prompts.
This is a wonderful book that will completely change your relationship with
numbers and open your eyes to the powerful symbolism behind number
patterns.”
—Nick Redfern, author of many books, including The Real Men in Black
THE TIME PROMPT PHENOMENON
Mysterious Signs, Sequences, and Synchronicities
Marie D. Jones and Larry Flaxman
This edition first published in 2019 by New Page Books, an imprint of Red
Wheel/Weiser, llc
With offices at:
65 Parker Street, Suite 7
Newburyport, MA 01950
www.redwheelweiser.com
Copyright
Copyright © 2019 by Marie D. Jones and Larry Flaxman All rights reserved.
No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or
by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording,
or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in
writing from Red Wheel/Weiser, llc. Reviewers may quote brief passages.
Previously published in 2009 by New Page Books, ISBN: 978-1-60163-047-
6.
ISBN: 978-1-63265-167-9
Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data available upon request.
Cover design by Kathryn Sky-Peck
Interior by Timm Bryson, em em design, llc Typeset in Warnock Pro
Printed in the United States of America
IBI
To Mary Essa and Max
Acknowledgements
Marie and Larry would like to thank our agent, Lisa Hagan, for, well . . .
everything. She is just the best. We would also like to thank Michael Pye for
championing this book from the very beginning and bringing it to its new
home at Red Wheel/Weiser. We so look forward to this new chapter with
Michael and his team.
To our families, friends, followers, fans, and, most of all, to our kids, Max
and Mary Essa—we thank you for all your support over the years!
Contents
IntroductIon
The Measure of Reality 1
chapter 1:1
Wake-Up Calls and Codes of Consciousness 5
chapter 2:2
This Is Your Brain on Numbers 23
chapter 3:3
Sacred Sequences and Cosmic Codes 45
chapter 4:4
Signs and Symbols 81
chapter 5:5
Mystery Numbers 103
chapter 6:6
Name, Rank, and Serial Number 119
chapter 7:7
Synchronicity 133
chapter 8:8
Just Six Numbers? 151
chapter 9:9
The Trouble with Numbers 171
chapter 10:10
Is God a Number? 183
chapter 11:11
Why Numbers Matter 203
appendIx
Number Trivia and Anomalies 207
Bibliography 221
Introduction
THE MEASURE OF REALITY
“One day you will learn to appreciate numbers.”
“Math will serve you well, just you wait and see.”
“Everything comes down to a number or series of numbers, even if it isn’t
obvious.”
How often have we heard such phrases, usually spoken by well-meaning
parents, teachers, and college professors? In this age of instant gratification,
we immediately receive answers via cell phone, calculators, and search
engines. All of the work is done for us. In fact, some might argue that we
don’t even need to know math anymore! Why even balance your checkbook
when it can be done auto matically by nearly every online banking program
or app? The world has changed, and our need to understand the numeric
world has been drastically diminished.
It’s a shame really, because there is magic and wonder in numbers . . .
especially when they appear in distinct and repetitive patterns that suggest
some deeper force is at work underlying the obvious and visible reality of
our five senses. All over the world, people report seeing number patterns
throughout their day, whether on digital clocks or restaurant bills, or even
bus benches. Many see the same pattern and wonder, what is this trying to
tell me? What is this numeric sequence saying?
There are those who see 1:11, 2:22, 3:33, and so on. 12:12. 12:34, and
possibly the most popular and oft reported number sequence—
11:11. If we did pay attention to our math teachers, we would have heard
them say that numbers and number ratios are the language of our universe,
and that if we were to someday be visited by some extraterrestrial
civilization, they likely would not speak to us in English or Chinese or Dutch
. . . but in the one language that is truly recognizable no matter what planet
you come from. Numbers.
Now don’t you wish you had paid more attention to cranky old Mr.
Hodgkins in eighth grade math class?
Those who are enamored by and attracted to the world of mathematics know
that underneath the algebra and geometry and calculus lessons is a world of
complete and utter supernatural, creative, and generative power. Behind
every great scientific discovery in physics, astronomy, and many other
arenas, lies a series of equations that look Greek to most, but contain the
alchemical ingredi-ents for all of creation, from gaseous stars to asteroids,
human life, and other biological forms.
Yes, science is filled with math and numbers, but so, too, is the world of
spirit. As we moved past the enigmatic year of 2012, when so many people
worried the world would end over a misinterpreted Mayan calendar, people
reported seeing a particular sequence every where: 11-11. They pointed to
the exact time of the winter solstice’s arrival in December 2012. 11:11 GMT.
They suggested it was not the end of the world at all, but the beginning of a
new era of spiritual growth, transformation, and ascension.
Cut to so many years later, and we still live in a world of dicho tomies. Good
and evil, light and dark, peace and violence.
Yet there is a sense of having ascended somehow into a greater under
standing of the whole “as above, so below” way of looking at human
existence. Today, thousands of people continue to see time prompts and
sequences, most notably 11:11, but plenty of others, too, and more and more
report the experience each year. Is it possible we are collectively being
contacted by other “beings”
such as angels, spirits, guides, hey— maybe even extraterrestrials?
Is this their way of reaching out and getting our attention so that we will stop
surfing the Internet, posting to social networks, and pay attention?
The idea of spiritual transformation is certainly not a new one.
There is still considerable debate as to whether or not we are in the Age of
Aquarius or have already moved through this era of positive change, both
individually and collectively. But look around . . . talk to people . . . and
even amidst the political chaos and ongoing strife, there is a growing sense
of connectedness to our inner beings, to one another, and to the natural world
around us.
It would be easy to say that people who report seeing these time prompts
only ascribe personal meaning to them because it makes them feel good or
that it is just the trick of a brain that loves to glom onto any kind of pattern it
can find and make order out of a chaotic world. But what of the stories of
synchronicities, magical and miraculous coincidences, and “aha” moments
that people insist occur each time they look up and see “11:11” or “3:33”?
Perhaps there is something more going on than just pure coincidence, more
than just a noggin trained to notice only what it wants to notice.
Perhaps, there are messages and signals and information floating in the ether
just waiting for us to lock on to them and allow them to help us live better
lives. Perhaps it is our higher selves speaking to us in a way that gets us to
notice amidst the many distractions tugging at our limited range of
perception. Perhaps it is a doorway to transformation that, if entered, can
lead humanity to higher ground.
Numbers and mathematics were once important to ancient philosophers and
men and women of wisdom. They knew what we have forgotten. Yet those
engaged in the most cutting-edge frontiers of scientific discovery have not
forgotten. Right before his death in March 2018, legendary theoretical
physicist Stephen Hawking wanted a particular equation on his gravestone.
Known as the Hawking Equation, it’s a mathematical expression of his
greatest work into the makeup of black holes, specifically that black holes
emit a glow known as Hawking Radiation. Not only did this equation allow
us to understand more about black holes, but about the entire process of
growth and change of our universe over time.
In the final days of his life on earth, Hawking was working on an attempt to
solve the mystery behind whether or not parallel universes existed. He spent
decades pondering this one question alone and worked over and over with
mathematical ratios and equations to try to unlock the key to other realities
and other worlds. He even published a paper before his death titled “A
Smooth Exit from Eternal Inflation,” explaining his theory on how current
physics could indeed explain the existence of these other universes that exist
alongside our own. Those who flocked online to read the paper had to have
had a mathematical or physics background to make sense of it, but to
Hawking, it was akin to a mystical, magical doorway to the possible. It will
now be up to other brilliant minds to take on the challenge of finding
absolute proof.
But for those who are grounded in this reality, yet have experienced the
liminal— the threshold between above and below, life and death, this world
and that, one level of conscious awareness and another— proof already
exists. We are more than just bodies, and the spirit already knows what
science is still struggling to crunch the right numbers on.
Chapter 1:1 WAKE-UP CALLS AND CODES OF
CONSCIOUSNESS
“Last night as I pulled into my driveway, I looked down at my mileage and it
read 11,111.1! Weird! Then [sic] I woke up this morning at 2:22 a.m.! This is
just getting too weird! Those angels are working their magic!”
“I began seeing 1111 many years ago. I also see 111, 222, 333, and so on.
Sometimes I’ll wake in the middle of the night at exactly 1:11. These
numbers have appeared on boxes, license plates, house numbers, friends
addresses, phone numbers, totals at the grocery store.”
“I woke up at 11:11 last night! I had only been asleep a short time! This
morning I was outside with my granddaughter and she said she wanted to go
in! Weird, she never wants to go in! So we went in and turned the TV on . . . I
noticed that the time on the screen was 11:11! I love the little reminders . . .
makes my day go so much better!”
11:11. 11-11. 1111. No matter what form it takes, the number sequence of
four 1s is the most often reported “time prompt,” or number sequence, in the
world. Dating back to the 1970s, when new age groups spoke of the coming
golden age of humanity, the “age of Aquarius” when we would come out of
the shadows of the murky Piscean age and walk into the light of awakening,
this particular number sequence has fascinated and enchanted thousands of
people. The meaning behind it has been hotly debated, but suffice it to say,
those who regularly experience it believe they are being “prompted” to wake
up, pay attention, and get ready in body, mind, and spirit.
But ready for what?
Even as scientists insist that numbers are the universe’s chosen form of
language, and the age of technology exists around binary code, we have
another side to us that recognizes these numbers on a whole different level.
Human consciousness, which we still really don’t know whether exists as
part of the mind or outside it, appears to operate on its own “code,” and
communicates with higher levels of existence via the use of number patterns
that speak to a deeper, archetypal collective unconscious. Meaning, our
brains don’t quite get it, but our spirits do.
In terms of 11-11, or 11:11, there are some unusual properties to think about
right off the bat. According to TimeandDate.com , the number 11 is
considered mathematically special because it is a primary number. When any
string of 1s is multiplied by itself, it equals a palindrome. Let’s try it:
11 X 11 = 121
111111 X 111111 = 12345654321
111111111 X 111111111 = 12345678987654321
Spooky, right? But does this mean anything other than some number
sequences have really peculiar properties that seem to hold a higher
intelligence within? Maybe.
11:11 THEORIES
The connection between 11:11 and other time prompts and number
sequences has spawned numerous theories involving everything
Wake-Up Calls and Codes of Consciousnefrom angelspeak to codes of DNA
and human consciousness, to mere pokes in the side from our dead relatives
and ancestral spirits trying to get us to open our eyes, focus, and notice
something. The significance of 11:11 is almost as varied as the people who
see it on a regular basis!
Some of the more persistent and widespread theories suggest that the
appearance of these numbers somehow portend that a window is about to
open and you must consult with your guides, spirit or otherwise, as to
whether or not you should go through it. According to Alanna Ketler in
“What is the Significance of 11:11” on the Collective Evolution website,
when you see this number sequence, you should stop and make a wish. The
association of 11:11 and making a wish is a popular one, perhaps fueled by
social networking where it seems to have gone viral. Memes and images
abound encourag-ing people to make a wish every time they see this number
pattern, even though finding the origin of this theory is somewhat impossible
(Hollywood has taken notice, with a few 11:11-oriented movies).
The phenomenon of 11:11 is usually positively associated with ascension of
the spirit and consciousness, so when we see this prompt, we are supposed to
stop and take notice, be open to whatever sensations, thoughts, and feelings
we have, and be receptive to the synchronicities that follow. But the same
might be said for 3:33, or 12:12, right? If all this means is you should slow
down and lift your consciousness, couldn’t you do that anytime you want to?
The same article goes on to state, “When you see 1111, whether on a clock, a
license plate, your bank statement, or anywhere else, it’s like a friendly little
sign from your soul, source, higher self, God, or the entire universe—
whatever you choose to call it— that everything is in alignment and you are
exactly where you need to be, right here, right now.” There is something
extremely intriguing about this. The idea that we resonate more positively to
certain numbers, words, and phrases over others is paramount to
understanding why seeing four 1s turns us on both spiritually and mentally.
WHY 11:11?
11:11 is pure, symmetrical, and pretty to look at. The number one often
refers to God, source, and creation. Numerologists claim the number 11
itself points to spirituality, revelation, enlightenment, idealism, and intuition,
so maybe that is why this particular sequence has a more profound effect on
us than 12:12 or 5:55 or 120021. Unless one of those other patterns has
extreme personal significance, like the birthday of a child or an important
street address, we generally don’t perceive the same level of meaning that
we see in 11:11. For those seeking more scientific proof of the importance of
numbers, in the next chapter we will explore some of the reasons why our
brains seem to love both symmetrical number sequences and numbers of all
kinds.
In terms of spirit, any explanation can be ascribed some meaning when a
number sequence or time prompt keeps showing up. Believe in spirit guides?
That’s them talking to you! Angels? Pay attention, they are guiding you!
Twin Flames? The man or woman of your dreams is coming! Awakened
consciousness? The time prompts tell you to get ready! It is all subjective
and often based upon our own beliefs and perceptions, even our religious
background or world view. A quick peek at any social networking site offers
these explanations and more for the appearances of time prompts such as
11:11.
If you are of a religious bent, you may believe that the number 1 is a divine
number representing the One, the All, or God. A non-religious person would
look at the same number and suggest it represents a leader, or even the self.
“Looking out for Number One.” A depressed loner will look at the number 1
as representing a lonely state of existence, as in “One is the loneliest
number.” It is also the number of unity, wholeness, and completeness. Yet
another person might say it is the number of solitude and being left to his/her
own devices. Yet at the most objective level, based on its Proto-Indo-
European root, the number 1 simply means there is only one of whatever it is
that is being counted! In mathematics, it is simply a digit that comes after
zero and before two.
Yet in complex mathematics, the number 1 becomes a dynamo that is
involved in numerous ratios and equations and is one of the most critical
base numbers there is, if not the most critical, to establishing measurement
and quantity. Without the number 1, we would not have computers or
algebra or physics or even the ability to distinguish an individual object out
of a million other objects, similar or otherwise.
NUMBER VIBES
Aside from the mathematical importance, though, our spirits/minds resonate
with the number 1, whether alone or doubled, as in 11, or symmetrical, as in
11:11, in a much different way. On a symbolic level, we feel it is a
connection to a higher power or source, a God source if you will. We sense it
has importance as a foundational building block to human life and even
consciousness (even if we don’t know the details behind it). We claim to feel
a sense of resonance with the frequency the number sequence “gives
off,” based on our already scientific understanding of how important the
number 1 is but added to our understanding that there is another side to our
existence that goes beyond the mere physical.
Might the symmetry of 11:11 give us a sense of balance in a chaotic world?
Does the appearance of this time prompt on our clocks and digital readouts
remind us to balance our work life with our play life, our emotions with our
thoughts, our masculine with our feminine qualities, our positive with our
negative? If so, the appearance of this time prompt helps us to be more
grounded and aware, even if there is no scientific basis for this kind of
meaning. Who cares, if it works! In “Spiritual Meaning of Number Eleven”
from Whats-Your-Sign.com , the author states that “Those who recognize the
spiritual meaning of the number Eleven in their lives are quite sensitive to
vibrational frequencies matching these attributes listed.” Those attributes
include: calm, tact, balance, justice, kindness, equality.
The article goes on to say that those who see elevens all the time are
thoughtful and intuitive souls. Perhaps this explains why some people never
see 11:11 or any other time prompt. They are not wired to do so or are not
operating on the correct vibrational frequency to make the connection.
In “11:11. Is It Happening to You?” on PowerofPositivity.com , the author
posits that our spirit guides, angels, or higher selves know how powerful the
act of repetition is in driving home important wisdom and insights. “Our
Spirit Guides, angels, or higher selves like to speak to us through various
methods, such as playing a recurring song on the radio that may have special
significance, answering a prayer, flipping to a certain page in a book we’re
reading, or even directing our attention to repeating numbers on a clock, or
sign, such as 11:11.” Then, as this happens to more and more people, who
talk about it on social networks, it goes viral; soon there is a collective shift
in consciousness and awareness as more people become aware of the same
number sequence. The article goes on to say that the “turning of ages” began
back on December 21, 2012, at 11:11 a.m., which, coincidentally, is the
exact time the Winter Solstice began and continued to usher us into the
Golden Age and out of the Dark Age. Ascended masters will come back to
the planet to assist in our healing and growth (the return of ancient aliens
perhaps?).
Therefore, seeing 11:11 means you are on the right path, and should stay put,
stay focused, and listen for more guidance. Those familiar with 11:11 attest
to the increase of synchronicities that happen when these time prompts
appear, and that they are little pokes and prods reminding us to stay present
enough to notice and process them. Otherwise, we miss ample opportunities
for growth and ascension.
TWIN FLAMES
For some, that growth may come from finally meeting up with a twin flame.
In “The Phenomenon and Meaning of 11:11: The Twin Flame Connection,”
on the Elephant Journal website, the number sequence may be telling us to
pay attention to things that increase our soul’s growth and to prepare for a
life filled with things we may not have imagined possible. One of those
things is the potential manifestation of our Twin Flame, or the unique soul
connection we share with the person from whom our soul was separated
when we came into this incarnation.
The concept of Twin Flames originated with the idea that before we were
born, our souls were once made of two halves. When we incarnate upon this
earth, we do so alone, and long to return to the “other half” of our soul if we
can find that person in this lifetime.
In order to do so, we must be spiritually ready for this “high level of
comfort, intimacy, understanding of each other and a sense of peace— it’s
the feeling of returning home.” The time prompts of 11:11 we see are
markers along the path back to our Twin Flame, and reminders that we must
be in a high vibration to meet and connect with them once more.
Seeing 11:11 means that we need to get ready, for our Twin Flame is nearby
or about to make himself or herself known to us. Will we be in a state of
present moment awareness to be able to recognize them, or focused on the
regrets of the past or the anxieties of the future, and miss them altogether?
DNA AND NUMBERS
In a later chapter, we will delve into numerology, which ascribes particular
characteristics to numbers using our names or dates of birth. Like astrology,
it’s all in the details and a number or letter has its own powerful meaning
and its own vibration. Thus, the numbers or translation to letters in your
name, or the numbers in your birthdate that add up to a “master number” can
give you incredible insight into yourself, your future, and your dreams. More
on that later.
Does the appearance of number sequences suggest something that might be
encoded in our DNA? Could our genetic material have the key that goes into
the lock that, when opened, reveals a true understanding of who we are and
why we are here? Possibly.
There are books about 11:11 being a doorway to another dimension, another
reality, and another level of consciousness for those lucky enough to
recognize the signs and heed them. A genetic revolution of sorts that makes
us superhuman and able to operate on a whole new level. The number 11 can
represent our twin strands of DNA, that when fully “activated” will trigger a
new and higher vibrational frequency upon which our consciousness
operates.
11:11 is the number of the shift that must occur to each one of us as
individuals, but also to the whole of society to lift the planet out of darkness
and into the light of a new conscious revolution. A Golden Age that will
bring about greater spiritual awareness, peace, and compassion.
If indeed the number sequence of 11:11 is directing us toward a Golden Age,
shouldn’t we all be seeing it continuously? A possible answer to that could
be that we must be aware and present to see the sequence. But really, how
often do we busy, distracted humans spend in the present? We stress over the
past. We stress over the future. We bury our heads in our computers and cell
phones and gadgets, unaware of what is passing us by—if only we looked up
and focused.
Spiritual awakening cannot occur to someone who is so trapped in the
physical world and so focused on the non-spiritual. Perhaps seeing 11:11
now and then is a way to get more and more people to stop, look, listen, and
find the guidance they need to play their own individual roles in the
evolution of the planet and all its beings. Maybe it also serves as a way for
us to “remember” why we are here and realign with our purpose by
examining our thoughts, behaviors, and actions to see if they truly reflect
who we are and hope to be.
ANGEL NUMBERS
Many people believe angels are behind these time prompts. It is a way for
our angels and spirit guides to make us pay attention so that they can impart
a message of wisdom or insight we need to hear.
At first, we see a particular number sequence just once or twice, but soon we
are seeing it everywhere, and we cannot help but pay attention to it. As we
begin to ask ourselves what these signs might mean, it’s important to stay
open to what we are thinking and experiencing in the present moment and
look for clues to decode the messages. Angels and spirit guides
communicate with us all the time, but they do so with signs and symbols that
speak to our subconscious minds where they can bypass the analytical,
judgmental conscious mind that wants to ignore the signs, or explain them
away as coincidence.
According to the website Ask-Angels.com, “The specific message depends
on where you are in the present moment. It depends on what’s happening in
your life and how far you’ve progressed on your awakening path. At first,
11:11 could simply be a wake-up call from your Angels and from your
higher self saying, ‘Hey, we’re here.’ There’s more going on than the
physical dimension.”
These time prompts allow us to focus in on what we are thinking and to
bring us back into the present moment so we can ask whether our thoughts
are serving us and directing us toward what we truly desire to manifest.
How often do we even think about the thoughts we are thinking?
The vast majority of the time, we are not thinking about what we want, but
instead of all the things that we don’t like or need. Guess what? When we do
that, we get more of them. But when we see 111
or 11:11, we can slow down and let our angels remind us to set our thoughts
straight and even make sure we are sending the highest and best thoughts out
into the collective.
Other numbers of the angels include:
222 – Newly planted ideas are taking root. Water and nurture them correctly
and don’t quit if you can’t yet see the growth.
333 – Ascended Masters are nearby and ready to offer guidance and love if
you call upon them. This can include Jesus, Mary, Moses, or any other
spiritual master figure.
444 – You are surrounded by loving angels. Do not worry!
555 – Major life change ahead. Buckle your seatbelt!
666 – Your thoughts may be out of balance and more focused on the
material. Refocus and get back to balance.
777 – You are doing great, and the angels are cheering on your progress.
888 – One cycle is about to end, and a new one will begin. Prepare and be
ready to harvest the seeds you planted earlier.
999 – The end or completion of one phase in your life.
000 – You and God/Source are one.
Angel messages can also be a combination of different numbers.
We can often feel the meaning behind these number sequences by using our
intuition, which is our higher knowledge self within.
ACTIVATION DOORWAY
Another popular theory about the meaning of 11:11 comes from a spiritual
author named Solara, who claims she had communications with
interdimensional beings and learned about the Doorway of 11:11 into the
Temple of Oneness. Her writings and teachings focus on 11:11 as a doorway
to ascension. She believes the Activation of that doorway occurred on
January 11, 1992. A Third Gate activation took place in 1997. The doorway
of 11:11 closed on December 31, 2011, and the time afterward is devoted to
individual transformation and freeing ourselves from duality’s grip. She also
believed that after the final closing of the doorway, there would be such a
newness to everything it would be beyond worlds.
Needless to say, this didn’t happen in visible and obvious ways, but for many
of her followers, hopefully that newness and transformation happened so
that one day soon we might reach a critical mass of enlightened souls.
For the many who call themselves “lightworkers,” 11:11 is a symbolic
number of great shift and transformation into a Golden Age that we are
either in right now, or that will begin soon (there is some confusion as to
when, much like the many dates ascribed to the Age of Aquarius).
GEORGE BARNARD AND URANTIA
Another popular figure in the 11:11 transformation movement is George
Barnard of the 11:11 Progress Group. Barnard is a known figure in the
lightworker world for his extensive work with what he calls “Midwayers,”
celestial beings that make up the Progress Group. The Midwayers were first
introduced in The Urantia Book in 1955, a 2,055-page book that claims to be
a divine revelation for Planet Earth. The book includes descriptions of higher
dimensional beings, loving beings of the spirit called Midwayers, who
interact with humans to assist us as we navigate the troubles of the world.
The Urantia Book, which serves as the basis for Barnard’s work, has sold
over a million copies and has been translated into fourteen languages. It even
claims to include an authentic “celestial record” of the life of Jesus and his
teachings (part 4 of the book).
The relationship to 11:11 comes from the intermingling of humans with
celestial beings that we might even call “angels,” for they can do things like
stop us from dying in a car crash or prevent a deadly accident from taking
place. Guardian angels, perhaps. The Urantia Book claims that these entities
are “midway between mortals of the realms and the angelic orders; hence
they are called midway creatures.” According to the book, when digital
clocks came into fashion, the Midwayers petitioned to claim 11:11 as their
prompt to contact humans! Thus, seeing 11:11 meant that a Midwayer was
trying to alert you to something, offer guidance, or get your attention.
Barnard had extensive contact with these Midwayers and teaches and
lectures on what they are and what their messages are for humanity, focusing
on the meanings of 11:11. The channeled messages the Progress Group
receives, which are read by people all over the world, are intended to assist
people who feel they may have a role to play in the transformation
movement. The Progress Group helps them identify those roles and decipher
the messages of the celestials that come in the form of number sequences.
THE SUBCONSCIOUS
Some might ask why our guides and angels don’t just speak to us in our own
language, so we cannot miss or mistake their guidance.
Perhaps it has something to do with the real power player in our lives, the
subconscious mind, which is responsible for approximately ninety percent of
our behaviors, beliefs, and patterns. The subconscious does not respond to
words as much as it does to symbols and patterns, because that is the
language it operates on. Symbolic images, even when they appear as number
sequences, speak to the deeper aspects of the mind and bypass the analytical
chatter of the conscious mind. Time prompts and sequences like 11:11 may
be understood by our subconscious, without ever being understood by our
conscious mind, and that is by design, because the subconscious is where the
most fundamental possibilities for change and awakening happen.
Remember, too, that signs and symbols can have different meanings to
different people, according to their cultural and societal beliefs and
upbringings. Yet we have found that 11:11 often means the very same thing
to people of all walks of life— pay attention, wake up, rise up, ascend, be
aware. So that suggests there is some deeper meaning at play that goes
beyond the personal perspective, into the wild and wooly world of the
“collective.”
ARCHETYPES
But is there a deeper meaning behind these numbers, one that speaks to each
of us on a collective, universal level? “The sequence of natural numbers
turns out to be unexpectedly more than just a mere stringing together of
identical units: it contains the whole of mathematics and everything yet to be
discovered in the field.”
Those are the words of Carl Jung. Most of us have been introduced to the
work of Carl Jung and his concepts of archetypes and the collective
unconscious, but just in case you were absent that week in school, here’s a
refresher.
Carl Gustav Jung was born in 1875 and was instrumental in the origins of
the fields of psychotherapy and psychiatry. He was a student of the great
Sigmund Freud, until the two parted ways over differences of opinions on
some key theories related to sexuality, the subconscious, and dreams. But
Jung went on to build a massive body of work involving the conscious,
subconscious, and the “collective unconscious” levels of the mind.
We know about our conscious minds. That is the mind that sees and
experiences and analyzes and processes the information our five senses are
exposed to. The subconscious is the deeper part of the mind that, like the
base of an iceberg, lies below the visible realm but is the powerhouse of
creating our patterns of thought, behavior, and action. If you want to stop a
bad habit or create a new life, you must know how to change the
programming of the subconscious, or you will simply repeat the pattern and
end up with what you always had.
The deepest part of the mind is the collective unconscious, which Jung
believed was the realm of connectivity to the rest of the universe and to other
living things. This realm is like a giant warehouse full of symbols and
archetypes that are universal in nature and therefore understood by all
humans regardless of age, color, creed, or background.
Archetypes are the “words” of the collective unconscious—
symbols that are the original models from which all similar items of the
same kind are created. They are the molds or blueprints of concepts and
ideas that are understood by anyone and everyone because they speak to a
common experience of being human. Before humans could write or even
verbalize their ideas very well, we took to drawing simple figures and
symbols on cave walls and rocks to convey information to others. Some of
those symbols would be altered to take on meaning according to country of
origin, religious beliefs, and traditions, but many stayed the same because
they spoke to such a deep, common element of existence. They were, and
are, unchangeable.
Archetypes can include everything from the “hero” and “villain” to the
“leader,” “teacher,” “savior,” and “demon.” Again, concepts that can be
understood by all because of their universality. And yes, numbers are
archetypal as well. We have core meanings we assign to numbers just as we
do to objects like birds, butterflies, and rockets.
Jung struggled with mathematics as a student and it was his later study of
archetypes that gave him a new appreciation for those pesky numbers that
had given him so much trouble. Many of his patients had dreams involving
numbers, and Jung began to see how they were related to patterns and
character traits the patients had that were being personified in their dreams in
the form of a number or numeric sequence. Jung believed that small integers
may be the oldest of archetypes involving order, because primitive humans
would have used them to keep track of objects of importance and to measure
things.
He also believed that smaller natural numbers corresponded with different
levels of the human psyche. The number 1 would be the stage of non-
differentiation. Two stood for polarity of opposites and opposition. Three
represented a movement toward a resolution and was akin to the trinity. Four
was the number of stability and wholeness. Thus, he linked numbers with
traits and characteristics in much the same way numerologists do. Numbers
took on an archetypal/universal quality that could be shared by all,
because all human psyches go through the same model of evolution and
development.
The archetype of order that numbers represent is probably the most
important reason why so many people see, and resonate with, 11:11.
Archetypes have incredible influence on and power over our subconscious
minds, and therefore, our conscious behaviors, beliefs, and patterns, even if
we are not aware of it. Because Jung believed that number was irreducible,
he felt it was the most critical driver of bringing order out of chaos, and as
an extension of that, the development of the field of mathematics paralleled
the development of the human psyche.
Pythagoras was right when he said, “All is number,” but even he may not
have realized just how deep a statement that was! However, Jung and others
who followed in his footsteps felt that the archetype label can really only be
given to smaller numbers, because as we develop a need for bigger and
bigger number sequences, it literally becomes impossible to ascribe any
particular meaning to them other than a quantity. The smaller integers are
where the magic is, allowing for the same primordial images of other
archetypal images. Not only that, but the smaller integers are the basis for
any larger number or numeric order, so that in and of itself makes them
archetypal in the study of mathematics.
All of this played into the work Jung did connecting the physical world to
the spiritual or inner world, unifying matter and the psyche, and noting the
powerful links between physics and mathematics as well as the inner realms
and workings of the human mind.
According to mathematical principles, simple ideas and structures evolve
into more complex ones. Jung believed that the same principal held true for
the world of the mind via simple archetypes that evolve into the complex
psyches and personalities that make us who we are.
THE DOORWAY TO SATAN?
The overwhelming majority of people experiencing 11:11 and other time
prompts speak of positive, even empowering experiences. But to some, the
time prompt is the doorway to the dark side. Synthia Esther, who founded
Synthia Esther Ministries, claims that 11:11 is a doorway to Satan’s world of
the occult and warns that lightworkers, New Agers, Midwayers, angels, and
guides, or anything metaphysical is a form of mass deception because of this
belief, which is documented on her website, www.sacredpursuit.org .
The idea here is that 11:11 is part of the ongoing battle between God and
Satan and that 11:11 is a calling card into the world of demons. This
certainly presents a stark contrast to the metaphysical belief that it indicates
positive, loving, joyful ascension and transformation. For those of a religious
nature, the site uses biblical quotes to show that people who believe in
godless myths will be punished and that they should even reject the Oneness
movement, which teaches that there is just one God. Some also believe that
fallen angels may be manipulating and recruiting people into believing the
evil workings of the 11:11 movement and that any and all teachings of a
spiritual, higher nature are a form of deceptive demonic control.
Perhaps it is up to each individual to decide whether seeing a number
sequence over and over is a positive thing or a negative thing. The vast
majority of people feel it is a positive force for individual and collective
change and a way to lift the world to higher ground . . . but don’t say we
didn’t warn you!
Chapter 2:2 THIS IS YOUR BRAIN ON
NUMBERS
You don’t have to be a mathematician to have a feel for numbers.
John Forbes Nash, Jr.
Remember the movie Rain Man ? Dustin Hoffman played a man named Ray
who had savant abilities when it came to numbers and mathematics. His
brain could process information extremely quickly. So quickly in fact that
what would take him a second . . .
would take the rest of us a day to figure out. He could determine the number
of toothpicks dropped on the floor by a waitress just by looking at the mess.
The rest of us might venture a guess, but we’d not be close unless we got on
the floor and counted them one by one ourselves.
NUMBER SENSE
The skills Ray had were extreme, but the truth is, we all have a region of the
brain that senses quantities, and does so rather quickly.
Just above each ear, there is a small patch of neurons responsible for giving
us a sort of extrasensory perception of amounts and quantities. Some
scientists even refer to it as a “number sense,”
much like our other five senses. According to an article on npr.org called
“Scientists Put a Sixth Sense for Numbers on Brain Map,” by Michaeleen
Doucleff, these small groups of neurons located on either side of our brains
help us to identify how many of an object we are seeing visually. Using
functional magnetic resonance imag-ing, a team of scientists at Utrecht
University in the Netherlands, led by Ben Harvey, showed subjects a series
of circles from one to eight in number on a screen, then mapped their brain
activity.
They saw a group of approximately 80,000 neurons (the size of a postage
stamp) light up in the brains of all the subjects as they counted the circles.
Interestingly, they determined that one side of the brain was more lit up
when the subjects identified smaller numbers, and the other side lit up when
exposed to larger numbers. It’s as if we have two built-in brain calculators
that identify a quantity, then adjust themselves to use more neurons to sense
the higher quantity accordingly. The example they give is being able to
quickly count five toothpicks but needing more time to quantify five
hundred.
The brain also appears to map a “mental number line,” according to the
Scientific American article “Our Brains Have a Map for Numbers.”
Neuroscientists located a small brain area devoted to numerosity that
operates along a continuous mapped region of the brain, similar to how we
organize numbers from the lowest at the left to the highest at the right.
Researchers in the Netherlands published a paper in the journal Science
showing that a region in the right superior parietal lobe of the brain, which is
in the upper back area, appears to map out the numerosity when the brain is
exposed to a number of dots on a screen. On the edge of this patch, closer to
the middle of the brain, small quantities are mapped. On the outside opposite
edge of the brain, larger quantities. They literally identified a consistent map
of subjects’ brains that followed activity along the map to identify how many
dots were seen— from smaller to bigger.
The parietal cortex area responded more to relative values and quantities,
rather than absolutes, showing that different areas of the brain are
responsible for processing quantities in a way that is relative to the
experience. Areas of the brain associated with language were also involved,
allowing us to make judgments of the numbers we are seeing. “Whether
you’re a math whiz or failed high school algebra, you can still readily judge,
almost subconsciously, that there are about twenty books on a shelf or a few
dogs running in the park,” the article’s author Emilie Reas, a neuroscience
doctoral student at UC San Diego, states. Because infants and animals show
this same skill, it may be an innate skill as much as hearing, sight, and touch.
Dr. Joseph Parvizi, an associate professor of neurology at Stanford, also
conducted a study involving seven people with epilepsy.
In the course of mapping activity in their brains, Parvizi discovered the same
general area of the brain responsible for number and quantity processing—
the inferior temporal gyrus that extends to both sides of the brain near the ear
canals. Made of between one and two million cells, this neural network
responds strongly to actual numbers and numeric quantities, yet it’s close to
the area of the brain that processes language and symbol interpretation. This
allows people to read numbers and words together, and understand one, the
other, and both without the brain overheating!
SEVEN DIGITS
On average, the longest chain of numbers a person can remember contains
seven digits. Think of a telephone number for example.
In the 1950s, psychologists labeled seven the magical number for the brain’s
active or working memory. In a study published in the journal Physical
Review Letters, a neuroscientist at UC San Diego named Mikhail
Rabinovich teamed with Christian Bick, a graduate student at the Max
Planck Institute for Dynamics and Self-Organization in Gottingen, Germany,
to show an actual picture of just how our brain neurons fire when we are
asked to recall a number sequence, word sequence, or a sequence of steps
such as driving instructions.
A cluster of neurons literally focus in on a word, number, or sequence one at
a time, so that when we hear or see a series or sequence of words, numbers,
or say driving directions, we can clearly follow and understand them, rather
than have them all identified in a jumble that makes no sense or puts them
out of order. Seven numbers or words seems to be the sweet spot where our
brains are able to recall the information on the fly, with anything over that
presenting greater and greater difficulty both in terms of actually
remembering the words or numbers . . . and recalling the exact order they
were first presented in.
Perhaps many of you have already experienced this when at the grocery
store trying to remember the eight things you had on your grocery list (the
one you left at home) and can only remember seven!
It’s not that our brains cannot handle more words and numbers.
Obviously, we all have memorized things for school events, or dialog from a
movie, that go well beyond the lucky seven limit. But for the most part, we
can recall it a whole lot easier when we only have seven to recall. This can
also explain why many people have such difficulty memorizing the lyrics of
songs beyond the first couple of lines or remembering the middle and
endings of famous poems.
The old parlor game “Telephone Operator” speaks to this as well.
To play the game, people stand in a line and pass a piece of information to
the next person and the person at the end then repeats what they were told.
Most likely, it won’t come close to what the first person actually said,
because as you go down the line, people remember according to the
individual capacity of their own brains and pass on what they think they
heard. By the end, you’ve got a completely different sequence or phrase than
you started with.
Savants may be able to use their brain’s numeric power much more
efficiently than the rest of humanity, but we all have the ability. We just need
to know our personal limits. It appears our own brains are as primed and
geared toward identifying numbers and numeric patterns as much as our
conscious minds, but perhaps in smaller quantities. Yet for those who
experience number sequences, time prompts, and synchronicities with
numbers, and feel there is much more to it than simple brain function, the
brain fails to do what only the mind can do . . . give these experiences
meaning, even imply a deeper connection to something both internal and
external that speaks a universal language meant to be identified by the brain
and understood by the mind.
THE RAS
So, might there be a reason why our brains notice 11:11 and other time
prompts that bridges the gap between the metaphysical and the physical, the
world of spirit and the world of our brains? Yes, there is, and it is called the
RAS— the Reticular Activating System.
Although some choose to call it the “human GPS.”
The RAS is a loose network of neural fibers and neurons that are clustered at
the brain stem. Neurons in the RAS connect with other parts of the brain via
two parts: the ascending RAS, and the descending RAS. The ascending RAS
connects to the cortex, thalamus, and hypothalamus. The descending RAS
connects to the cerebellum and all nerves responsible for our five senses.
The RAS has a role in sleep and wakefulness, eating, sex, walking,
elimination, breathing, heartbeat, and even behavior and motivation, but
what makes it so fascinating in terms of the time prompts that people report
is the way it works. For such a small cluster, its functions are many,
including giving our brains the ability to control what we consciously
perceive, and thus what becomes a part of our reality.
So the RAS is a filter that literally sifts through hundreds of millions of bits
of information coming at the brain every moment of every hour of every day,
to help us focus on just the few bits that we need to for our daily survival.
Out of approximately 400 million bits of information bombarding the brain,
that can be as little as just forty bits. The rest is deemed unimportant and
therefore does not become a part of our conscious awareness . . . until it
does.
Let’s say you see 11:11 once. Big deal. Then you see it again, and maybe a
third time in a very short timeframe. Now your brain’s RAS is alerted to zero
in, like a GPS, on more 11:11s, because it has suddenly caught your attention
and become important to you.
All other stimuli coming at the brain, including sensory information like
sights and sounds and smells, gets kicked to the rear, because your focus is
now on seeing more of these time prompts as you marvel at the coincidence
of it all and wonder what meaning it might have. You’ve made it more
important than the other 399,999,960 bits of information coming at you, and
now, you will see it everywhere.
Remember buying a car or a piece of clothing that you were certain was
unique? Immediately after leaving the shop or deal-ership you began seeing
it everywhere. Why had you not noticed it before? Because it wasn’t
important to you then, only now it is, and your RAS is now on full alert to
see it everywhere you go.
The RAS even works in your dreams, which is why some symbols and
themes repeat themselves, as they are important to your subconscious mind,
which speaks and understands the language of dreams. Psychotropic drugs
have a strong effect on the RAS, too, which may explain the often-
archetypal visions and images people see under their influence, images that
under normal circumstances mean nothing but are extremely critical to the
collective unconscious mind.
For the RAS, seeing 11:11 repeatedly becomes a top shelf focus for the
brain, and when coupled with personal or collective meaning, it will
continue to show up throughout your lifetime, until it becomes nonimportant
or, as some believe, teaches you the lesson it is meant to teach you. In terms
of the law of attraction teachings, what you focus on expands, and where
your thoughts go, your reality manifests. The RAS assists with making sure
that your actions and behaviors line up with the focus of your mind. If you
are focused on poverty or anger, you tend to attract more poverty and
reasons to be angry. If your focus is on being happy no matter what, you
attract more happiness. No matter what. As simple as it sounds, it is more
complex, but again, it’s all about the brain actually determining what it will
perceive and process based upon what is important or prominent in your
thoughts.
Next time you see 11:11 or any other time prompt over and over, remember
that even though your brain is doing what it does, there still may be a higher
and more spiritual reason why those numbers are important to you and not
others. That may be something only your subconscious, or collective
unconscious, understands, but worry not, for those powerful parts of the
mind drive your basic actions, beliefs, and behaviors. Ultimately, though, it’s
up to you to choose to wisely program, or reprogram, what goes into this
vast database of information that has triggered your RAS into action from
the time you were born.
Although there might be a sound scientific explanation for seeing time
prompts and sequences (or even word sequences and symbols, for that
matter), that doesn’t automatically imply that they have no deeper meaning.
Nor does it mean that they do. One thing we can say for sure is that people
having these experiences know that something other than a neuron response
or a change in focus is happening to them, and that it involves an actual shift
in consciousness that opens them up to synchronistic and serendipitous
experiences they would have otherwise missed.
An example of this would be someone seeing 4545 everywhere.
They may be able to identify how it began with one situation where they
needed to find a house with that number. That event made 4545 stand out as
important amidst a sea of numbers because they needed to find that house.
Over time, their RAS is still seeing 4545 because it is conditioned to see it,
since it was important at one time. The pattern has been set, and the neural
pathway has been created. Now, not seeing it becomes a more difficult
challenge!
Now imagine that during a 4545 sighting, right at that time of focus and
present moment awareness, something significant happens. Say you get a
great solution to a long-term problem. You find the perfect ending to your
novel. You hear the final notes of the song you’ve been writing. You avoid
being hit by a car. The importance of that sequence becomes so ingrained in
your brain, in the latter case as a survival mechanism, you then see it
everywhere for the rest of your life and recall how it was critical to what you
were dealing with at the time. Like a snowball rolling downhill, you now
experience even more aha moments and wake-up pokes when you see 4545.
Congratulations, this has become your own personal power prompt!
This is a great example of the brain and mind (or mind/consciousness)
working in tandem to make sure that you get the information you need when
you need it, in the language that is understood by the subconscious and
collected unconscious . . . even if it isn’t understood by the conscious mind
right at the moment it happens.
As scientists continue to learn more about how the brain functions, and how
consciousness works with the activity of the brain to create reality and
perception, we will no doubt discover that what seems to be purely scientific
and mundane is actually a part of a much larger process that allows us to
have experiences that are both normal and “para”-normal, including liminal
experiences where we sense that there is more to our world than meets the
eye, nose, ear, mouth, and skin. Numbers may be the doorway to that sixth
sense that links science with spirit.
Look at the back of a $100 dollar bill; you may never have noticed it before,
but if you count the windows on the smaller buildings (not including doors)
to the right and left of the main part of Independence Hall, it adds up to 11
and 11. Is this part of some grand conspiracy to ingrain this mysterious
number in our brains? A message from some secret society? Or could it just
be coincidence?
Coincidence or not, the windows on either side add up to 11, a most
mysterious number that seems to hold some meaning for many people. Image
courtesy of U.S. Federal Reserve.
WHY AND HOW NUMBERS EVOLVED
From the dawn of time, humankind realized that it needed a way to measure
things, to count things, to understand the quantity of things. In the beginning,
man had the need to simply track ownership. From this basic need, numbers
were born and have been utilized in such a manner ever since. Later, the
economics of trade and barter necessitated the need for more.
The first known use of numbers as objects for purposes of counting is said to
date back to approximately 40,000 to 30,000 BC, according to scholar
Georges Ifrah, author of The Universal History of Numbers , when bones
and artifacts with distinct “tally marks”
have been dated. Prehistoric humans may also have used their basic
understanding of numbers to help them track the stars through the sky,
divide day and night into time frames, keep tabs on flocks of birds and herds
of animals, and even track the growth of their children. Eventually, the
crudeness of tally marks upon bone and stone was replaced with far more
complex representations, but Ifrah states that tally sticks, as crude as they
might seem, were still in use until fairly recently by Native American labor
workers.
Ifrah calls tally marks “one-for-one correspondence,” which “allows the
simplest of minds to compare two collections of beings or things, of the
same kind or not, without calling on the ability to count in numbers.” For
millennia, primitive peoples used this one-for-one correspondence with the
things they had available at the time, such as bone, rock, or sheep.
The first known written numbering system, according to Ifrah’s book, came
to us from the fourth millennium BC in Elam. It was here that the pebble-
method of accounting was discovered and used by accountants using
“molded, unbaked clay tokens in the place of ordinary or natural pebbles.”
Each token had a different value representing a unit of one or higher, and
even tokens of different shapes represented a specific value, that is, a small
pellet might be 10, and a larger rock might be 100.
It is the subject of debate among anthropologists, historians, and
mathematicians as to whether disparate cultures developed their own number
systems, or the ideas of using numbers was somehow “seeded” from a
handful of more technologically advanced cultures, which then spread. Most
agree that our own numeric system is based upon the Hindu-Arabic system.
The majority of experts also agree that cardinal numbers (1,2,3 . . .) then led
to ordinals (1st, 2nd, 3rd, and so on), and may have been the result of using
fingers and digits to place objects in a specific order.
And you always thought it was a joke about using both hands and feet to
count!
Other than the typical crude bone and stone tally markers of our cave-
dwelling ancestors, the development of numbers seems to have closely
paralleled the development of culture, language, and higher knowledge. The
oldest of cultures represented numbers with the repeated use of pictorial
images to represent a particular object. Nowhere was this more obvious than
in the Egyptian culture, which employed three types of number systems: the
hieroglyphic, the hieratic, and the demotic.
Egyptian Numbering Systems
The hieroglyphic is the most widely recognized system, and was often
written on stone. Hieroglyphics were not specifically focused on “numbers,”
as it was a much more formal mode of language. The hieratic, or temple
writing, was more commonly used by priests, and was written on papyrus.
The demotic system emerged from the hieratic and became the
commonplace system of textual writing. Egyptian numbers were written
right to left and the numbers 1 through 9 were represented by vertical lines
or strokes. Higher numbers were represented by more symbolic shapes, such
as the coil of rope for 100, and the man with upraised arms for
1,000,000 (this makes sense, for who would not raise up their arms upon re-
ceipt of 1,000,000 objects!).
Sumerian Numbers
The ancient Sumerians and Babylonians adopted the use of symbols to
represent numeric groupings. The Sumerians, using the base-60, or
sexagesimal system, actually only had two numbers to deal with, 1 and 10,
and all other digits combined the two symbols accordingly.
Early Babylonians, using both the base-10 and base-60 systems, developed a
series of vertical strokes and triangular shapes to indicate both low and high
numbers. Amounts were represented by a corresponding increase or decrease
in the number of lines and triangles.
Interestingly enough, these simple systems rarely included the concept of
zero.
Mayan Numbers
Other cultures, such as the Maya, used various types of horizontal strokes
and dots to represent number groupings. Both the Maya and Aztecs operated
on the vigesimal system of base-20, which is unlike the denary (base-10)
system that is in use today. Their numbers combined sticks, bars, and dots,
and unlike previous numeric systems, even included a shell-like symbol to
represent the concept of “zero.”
Chinese Numbers
The Chinese system shares some common patterns with current Chinese
numbers, and utilized a “rod system” and was derived from the ancient use
of sticks of wood on counting boards. The concept of zero was indicated by
a square, and higher numbers were written in monogram form. Vertical lines
were added to the tops and bottoms of the sticks to represent increased
numeric values. Also known as “math sticks,” this ancient method of
counting has been traced back seven thousand years to the Yangshao culture,
according to an article in the UNESCO Courier by Du Shiran, titled “The
Math Sticks of Early China— Chinese Calculation Using Counting Rods.”
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14
The Maya used lines and dots to create their number system. Image courtesy
of Wikipedia.
Earthenware shards excavated in the Henan and Shanxi Chinese Provinces
show inscribed marks that are a combination of vertical lines.
This early arrangement is believed to be the most ancient numeric system to
have emerged from China. Early Chinese mathematicians used counting
rods, which were sticks made of bamboo called “chou.” These sticks were
arranged into configurations, which were used to perform calculations. This
became known as “chou suan,” or “calculating with chou.”
A more modern Chinese numeric system involved the use of “or-acle bones”
by the Shang people, upon which some five thousand Chinese characters
were inscribed as a way of tracking the number of birds and animals that
were both hunted and sacrificed. These systems evolved throughout the
millennia, and eventually became the present-day Chinese characters.
Aztecs
According to new research by mathematician Maria del Carmen Jorge y
Jorge of the National Autonomous University of Mexico, the Aztecs, on the
other side of the world, also used combinations of hearts, arrows, hands,
bones, and arms in their system of measurement. Working with geographer
Barbara Williams, del Carmen Jorge y Jorge examined the Codex Vergara,
an ancient Aztec land surveying book, and discovered unequivocal
correlations between land plot lengths and the combinations of images. The
researchers also found a very surprising correlation: 60 percent of the fields
matched the basic surveying calculations used today, and many of the fields
were sloped and terraced, indicating a remarkable understanding of
agricultural methodology.
The Aztec’s agricultural and engineering successes prove that even this type
of crude measurement provided an acceptable level of accuracy.
The ancient Romans, Greeks, and Hebrews used alphabetic systems that
included a letter of their alphabet corresponding to a number. The 22 letters
of the Hebrew alphabet represent the numbers 1 to 400, with numbers above
that represented by composition. For example, the number 500 would be
represented by the corresponding letters for 400 and 100.
Roman Numerals
Similarly, the Greeks and Romans also used an alphabetic number system.
The Greeks actually had two systems. Their first system, which was in place
through the 1st century BC, used initial letters that corresponded to each
number, again combining them with the letter for the digit 5 to create larger
numbers. Dots indicated numbers in the hundreds, and a bar was placed to
the left of the numbers to indicate thousands. The Greek system, known
as “Isopsephy” (which roughly translates to “equal pebble”), referred to the
earlier practice of using pebbles to create patterns for learning basic math
and geometrics. This early method is related to the Hebrew Gematria and
has links to Masonic number symbolism, which is in use today.
Roman numerals may have been based upon the number 5, used specific
letters to indicate the digits 1, 5, 10, 50, 100, 500, and 1,000.
For some numbers, instead of “adding on” to existing number/letters, the
Romans chose to do things a little bit differently by incorporating the
“subtractive principle.” An example would be the number 9, which is 10, or
X, preceded by a 1, or I, resulting in IX, rather than VIIII, a 5 with four 1s
after it.
Current Times
Today, we use a hybrid number system referred to as the Indian-Arabic. It is
one of three main families of symbol sets that utilize the Hindu-Arabic
Numeral System. According to Wikipedia, this system is defined as a
“positional decimal system,” and dates back to the 9th century. This
arrangement is designed “for positional notation in a decimal system,” using
decimal points to indicate the separation of placement of 1s from the 10ths
place. There are only two other families using this positional numeral
system: the eastern Arabic numerals used in Egypt, and the Indian numerals
used in India.
Our well-loved digits 0 through 9 were initially developed in India from
earlier Brahmi numerals, between the 2nd century BC and the 6th century
AD. Although we generally refer to this system as Arabic (because it was the
Arabs who taught these numbers to the Europeans in the Middle Ages) some
historians suggest that the numbers 0 through 9 were actually first used in
parts of West Asia. Their hypothesis is that this system quickly spread into
Europe in the 10th century AD via the work of Arabic astronomers and
mathematicians. The very first inscription found to use the number 0 came
from the western Arabic world as well, around 870 AD, but Indian
documents on copper plates also show the use of 0 as far back as the 1st
century AD.
Once the exclusive purview of mathematicians, the Indian-Arabic system is
now the most widely used and recognized in the world. Two
mathematicians, the Persian Al-Khwarizmi and his Arabic colleague Al-
Kindi, are credited with the spread of the Indian-Arabic system throughout
the Middle East and into the West via their books On the Calculation with
Hindu Numerals and On the Use of the Indian Numerals, respectively. Both
tomes, written between 825 and 830 AD, were the later foundation for 10th-
century Middle Eastern mathematicians who expanded the original system to
include fractions.
Base Systems
Starting with base systems, we find that there is indeed a way to measure
everything, from the amount of information a computer can process to how
many yak can cross a ravine in three weeks.
Digital computers use the binary, or base-2, system in general, to represent
two states of transistor voltage, either high or low, one or zero. The binary
system is often equated with states of “on” or “off.” In comparison, many
ancient cultures utilized the base-5 system (quinary), most likely because
that is how many fingers they had on each hand! But the Yuki, a Native
American tribe in Northern California, took that idea one step further,
developing a base-8 system that included the spaces between fingers, yet
only included digits up to 8. This novel idea is certainly unique among the
various system permutations.
By far, the most popular system in the world is the base-10 decimal system.
Widely used today, its origin is also allegedly linked to the total number of
human fingers. Yes, the next obvious system would be base-20, as we have
twenty fingers and toes combined, and many Pre-Columbian Mesoamerican
cultures, such as the Maya, used this vigesimal system.
Another system, the base-12, also gained popularity. The duo-decimal and
dozenal base-12 systems are used in multiplication and division, and led to
the popularity of the “dozen” quantitative measurement. Also, 12 is a
common unit of measurement in the United States. There are 12 inches in a
foot, and day and night are divided into 12-hour chunks of time. On a more
epicurean note, not only was the famous “Philly Cheese Steak” originally
created as a 12-inch delicacy but also most pizza joints’ standard size pie is
12 inches.
The base-60, or sexagesimal, system is also a familiar one as it is used in our
measurement of time. As we all know, there are 60 seconds in a minute, and
60 minutes in an hour. This system was used by many Mesopotamian
cultures, including the Sumerians, and may have originated by combining
the base-10 and base-12 systems. Proof of this is demonstrated in the
Chinese calendar, which uses a base-60 system to denote years, yet gives
two “symbols” to each year, one base-10 and one base-12 (the base-12
corresponding with the twelve animals of the Chinese Zodiac).
Just as a variety of base systems were developed to fit specific needs,
mathematicians also developed varying types of numbers.
Fortunately, for the average person, the “real” basic digits (1 to 10), as well
as a modicum of addition, subtraction, multiplication, and division skills will
suffice for the vast majority of everyday needs. But for those truly obsessed
with the magnetic power of numeric possibility, or those in scientific and
other fields that actually require more than just the basics, settling just for
the real digits, would be, well, unreal.
Zero
What we know about the origin of zero is that it seems to have appeared in
various cultures around the same time.
The word zero comes from the Italian zefiro via the Arabic afira , meaning
“it was empty” or “nothing.” This was used originally in the translation of
the Sanskrit nya, meaning “void” or “empty” (think also “null”). In the
second millennium BC, the Babylonians were indicating a positional value
for zero in their numeral system.
Indian scholars such as Pingala were using the Sanskrit word for zero ( nya )
as far back as the 2nd century BC.
Even the ancient Greeks waxed poetic about the existence of zero. In fact, it
became a topic of philosophical discussion, and religious scholars joined the
debate during the medieval period. Scholars questioned the concept of “nil.”
How could there be such a thing as nothing? Yet already, most numeric
systems were indeed making a special place for zero, either as a true number
used alone, or, as a placeholder to create a specific context. Once the Hindu
decimal system we use today spread from western Arabia into Europe, the
concept of zero or nil spread along with it.
A true zero was also utilized in the Roman numeral system, sometime
around 523 AD, with the word nulla meaning “nothing”
and leading to the widespread use of the word by most medieval
mathematicians. Another very early documented use of true zero dates back
to 628 AD in the Brahmasphutasiddhanta , later spread-ing into China and
the Middle Eastern Islamic world. But in 1229
AD, the Roman Catholic Church banned the use of zero, stating it was a
Godless number because division by zero resulted in infinity.
Thankfully, a medieval monk and abacus counter named Raoul de Laon
reintroduced the concept of zero into western Europe, despite pressure from
Italian bankers and abacus users who objected to the “empty” number on
their books! Zero soon became a sort of underground symbol used by
merchants and smugglers who used the number in their “account keeping.”
Infinity
At the other end of the spectrum, the idea of a never-ending number, or
“infinity,” had its earliest recorded mention in the Isha Upanishad of the
Indian YajurVeda circa the 3rd century BC. The reference, “If you remove a
part from infinity or add a part to infinity, still what remains is infinity” is
the first known written idea of the infinite. The Indian mathematical text
Surya Prajnapti categorized numbers into three sets: enumerable,
innumerable, and the infinite. This set system was quite complex for its time
and was later adapted by the Jain sect, who believed that even infinity had
various subdivisions: infinite in length, infinite in volume, infinite in area,
and perpetual infinity (dimensional). The mind boggles at the infinite
possibilities.
The symbol which is commonly associated with infinity may have its origins
rooted in the Latin lemniscus, meaning “ribbon.”
Anthropologists and historians suggest that this symbol may have originated
with the Tibetan rock carvings of the ouroboros, or
“world snake,” which is also associated with infinity and a never-ending
circle.
The one person who has been most readily associated with the origin of the
infinity symbol is John Wallis (1616–1703). Wallis was an English
mathematician who is also partially credited with the creation of calculus. As
a tribute to his important contributions, Wallis also has an asteroid named
after him called Asteroid 31982
Johnwallis.
From nothing to everything, numbers run the gamut. In between these two
extremes, the following have emerged:
• Natural Numbers— The integers we use every day, from zero to 1, 2, 3, 4,
and onward. These are our counting numbers, therefore, our natural
numbers, represented by N.
• Negative Numbers— Integers less than zero, opposites of positive numbers
(anything over a zero!), and are usually written using a “minus” symbol, as
in –7. Therefore, the opposite of 7
is –7. We use the Z to indicate negative integers.
• Real Numbers— All measuring numbers, usually written using decimal
points to indicate position.
• Rational Numbers— Numbers that can be expressed as a fraction, with the
numerator (which is the top of the fraction, for the mathematically
challenged!), a natural integer, and the de-nominator (bottom of fraction), a
natural number other than zero. All rational numbers are also considered real
numbers (which means that it can be written in decimal form as well as
fraction form). Confused yet?
• Irrational Numbers— Opposite of rational numbers. Pi is also an irrational
number that we will look at in a later chapter.
Irrational numbers are not crazy, they are just not rational.
• Complex Numbers— A set of numbers that are represented as C and allow
a negative number to have a square root. The origin of complex numbers
dates back to Heron of Alexandria in the 1st century AD. Complex numbers
occur when you put a real number and an imaginary number together. Don’t
attempt this at home without adult supervision.
• Computable Numbers— Also known as recursive numbers or
“computable reals,” these are real numbers that can be “computed to within
any desired precision by a finite, terminating algorithm.” Suffice to say, you
don’t need to know these to balance your checkbook.
• Palindromic Numbers— Palindromes are numbers with digits that read the
same backward as forward. 23432 is a palindromic number. They are used in
recreational mathematics where palindromic numbers with special properties
are sought. A “palindromic prime“ is a palindromic prime number.
• Superreal Numbers— Take real numbers and extend them by adding either
infinitesimally small numbers or infinitely large numbers. Why do this?
Only a mathematician knows for sure.
• Imaginary Numbers— Numbers we give the special letter I symbol to in an
example to represent an unknown or imagined property. They can also be
defined as “a number whose square is a negative real number.” Still
following us?
• Prime Numbers— A prime number (or a prime) is “a natural number
greater than 1, which has exactly two distinct natural number divisors: 1 and
itself.” An infinitude of prime numbers exists, as demonstrated by Euclid
around 300 BC. The first thirty prime numbers are: 2, 3, 5, 7, 11, 13, 17, 19,
23, 29, 31, 37, 41, 43, 47, 53, 59, 61, 67, 71, 73, 79, 83, 89, 97, 101, 103,
107, 109, and 113, according to Wikipedia. Prime numbers are a part of
“number theory,” the branch of mathematics that studies natural numbers.
• Mythical Numbers— Numbers that don’t really exist except in the minds
of man and myth. Mythical numbers are often accepted as fully factual, yet
have no exact origin. Max Singer of the Hudson Institute coined the term in
1971. An example of this would be the popular claim that humans only use
10 to 12 percent of their brains. Most of us know the truth— they use far
less! Another mythical number is 20— for the twenty times most
grandmothers suggest you chew your food before swallowing (in order to
aid digestion).
• Indefinitive/Fictitious Numbers— Numbers of a “ginormous” size used for
comical effect or exaggeration. Examples would be: zillion, jillion, gazillion,
and umpteen. These terms serve to take numbers far beyond the point of,
say, hundreds of billions, but come just short of reaching infinity.
These all serve a distinct purpose for the many branches of mathematics
developed to solve the problems of reality. Simple division. Algebra.
Calculus. Geometry. Trigonometry. Were these constructs designed to torture
and confuse us? Perhaps, but, more importantly, they all play significant
roles in measuring and quantifying everything around us.
Chapter 3:3 SACRED SEQUENCES AND
COSMIC CODES
Numbers are peculiar animals. They can unlock secrets, split atoms, reveal
the inner workings of people and machines or draw patterns of outstanding
complexity and beauty.
—Dame Anita Roddick, Numbers
When buildings talk, it is never with a single voice.
—Alain de Botton, The Architecture of Happiness Throughout time
immemorial, numeric sequences, patterns, and codes have proven useful to
humans. As a significant part of our daily lives, they have also become an
integral part of the mystery, mystique, and magic of the human experience.
Many forms of music, cosmology, art, architecture, and nature incorporate
patterns and sequences that, while appearing to be haphazard on the surface,
under deeper examination reveal commonalities simply too deliberate to be
random or accidental. Nowhere else is this more significant than in the
mysterious and enigmatic world of sacred geometry.
Sacred geometry constitutes the foundation of the design of sacred
architecture and art. Geometrical and mathematical ratios, harmonics, and
proportion are found in music, light, cosmology, and natural structure, and
these ratios have, at their respective foundations, a divine origin. Among the
uses of sacred geometrical proportions are the building of structures such as
temples, mosques, megaliths, monuments, and churches; the location and
placement of sacred spaces such as altars, temenoi, and tabernacles; meeting
places such as sacred groves, village greens, and holy wells; as well as the
creation of religious art, iconography, and symbolism.
Again, the underlying premise behind sacred geometry is that there is a
divine influence and connection between objects and their physical
placement and measurements. It is believed by some that this divine
influence can, if studied and dissected, lead to a transformative
understanding of a greater reality at play in the universe.
Mathematician Heinrich Hertz is quoted as saying, “We cannot escape the
feeling that these mathematical formulae have an independent existence and
an intelligence of their own, that they are wiser than we are, wiser even than
their discoveries, that we get more out of them than was originally put into
them.” For those who designed architecture, created art, and formed
structures around the mystery of numbers, that intelligence came from a
heavenly source.
PYTHAGORAS
We might say that the worship of numbers began with the famed Greek
mathematician Pythagoras. Pythagoras lived from approximately 572 BC to
490 BC and was the founder of a monastic religious movement called, not
surprisingly, Pythagoreanism. This group espoused the mysticism of math
and philosophy. Pythagoras, known as “the father of numbers,” is said to
have made major contributions to many areas of study, yet few scholars can
pinpoint definitive proof, suggesting that perhaps some of his greatest ideas
and accomplishments may not have been his own!
Nevertheless, the followers of this man of wisdom (who called themselves
“Pythagoreans”) spent their days living under strict cultural rules of conduct,
eating no meat and disowning all personal possessions. In many ways a
school, the inner circle of this organization, called the “Mathematikoi,” and
the outer circle, the “Akousmatikoi,” under Pythagoras’s influence, studied
religion and mathematics under the cloak of secrecy. Eventually, the inner
and outer circles clashed and split off, leaving Pythagoras’s own wife,
Theano, in charge of those closest to the teacher himself.
In addition to his interest in math and the magic of numbers, Pythagoras was
fascinated with music theory and harmonics. One of his most intriguing
theories regards the “harmony of the spheres.”
His belief was that the movement of the planets and stars corresponded with
mathematical equations as well as musical notes, thus producing a
“symphony of the spheres.”
Many of his other beliefs, such as reincarnation, the transmi-gration of souls,
and life after death, heavily influenced other deep thinkers of his time. At
one point, Pythagoras even went so far as to suggest that the very essence of
being, or reality, is number, and that knowledge of one’s own essence must
come from a deeper understanding of number and the study of mathematics.
Plato
Pythagoras was a recognized influence upon another famous individual—
the classical Greek philosopher Plato (428/427 BC to 348/347 BC). Plato,
who was a student of Socrates and teacher of Aristotle, was one of the most
critical forces behind the philosophical foundations of Western culture.
Plato, also a mathematician, was founder of the Academy in Athens, which
was believed to have been the first institution of higher learning in the
Western world.
Plato’s own studies into music and harmonics suggest that he was influenced
by a third-generation Pythagorean named Archytas, who contributed a great
deal to geometry.
Mysterium Magnum
Some scholars have linked the ancient secretive society of Pythagoreans to
more modern secret orders such as the Rosicrucians, Knights Templar, and
Masons. These groups have rich histories rife with the teachings of sacred
geometry and mystical mathematics. Often incorporating the concept of the
“Mysterium Magnum”
(Latin for “great mystery”) and usually associated with alchemy and
mysticism, they were (and continue to be) a cause for frequent speculation,
rumor mongering, and scholarly debate.
The Mysterium Magnum, also called the “Great Design,” denoted a
universal source energy from which all of the Classical Elements emerged.
This concept bears striking similarities to both the Zero Point Field of
quantum physics as well as the Akashic Records of renowned clairvoyant
and healer Edgar Cayce. Indeed, the patterns and proportions ascribed to
geometrically inspired objects were thought to be inspired by heavenly
forces, and by all accounts, would seem to suggest a Great Designer.
Golden Ratio
Not surprisingly, the natural world offers a plethora of examples of divine
and intelligent patterns ripe for analysis. Many of these patterns are even
present in the structure of living organisms! Two of the most stunning
examples are the Golden Ratio and the Fibonacci spiral, both of which imply
a higher order of measurement behind what many of us take for granted,
such as our own bodies . . . or a seashell.
The Golden Ratio, also known as the Divine Ratio, the Golden Ration, and
Golden Mean, is an irrational number of approximately 1.618033988749.
One might ask why that specific ratio would be any more “divine” than any
other. Perhaps only the Great Designer knows for sure, but this ratio is found
throughout the natural, scientific, and manmade worlds as the highest
expression of balance, symmetry, and aesthetics. This fundamental formula
can be described as “the ratio whereby the ratio of the whole to the larger
section equals the ratio of the larger section to the smaller section.”
Referred to as “phi,” this ratio is present in many sacred icons such as the
measurements of the Great Pyramid of Giza, the structure of a five-pointed
star, a Pentagram (a sacred object to followers of Plato and Pythagoras), and
even in the outline of the Acropolis near Athens, Greece (which takes the
shape of a Golden Rectangle). Most notably, as represented by Leonardo da
Vinci’s famous Vitruvian Man, the Golden Ratio is present in the structure of
the human body, with outstretched arms and legs showing the Golden Ratio
at work.
The Golden Ratio, or Golden Mean.
da Vinci’s Creations
The Vitruvian Man got its name from the ancient Roman architect,
Vitruvius, whose “De Architectura” has been credited as being the
inspiration for da Vinci’s use of the Golden Ratio in his scientific and artistic
endeavors. The drawing itself was found around 1487 AD as a part of da
Vinci’s many written journals that were filled with notes and diagrams of his
intellectual and philosophical mus-ings. Da Vinci was apparently so
enamored of the Golden Ratio that he included it in his famous The Last
Supper painting. The overall composition of the painting contains three
vertical Golden Rectangles, and one decagon (a Golden Ratio shape) in the
figure of Jesus.
This derivation of the Vitruvian Man by Leonardo da Vinci depicts nine
historical units of measurement: the yard, the span, the cubit, the Flemish
ell, the English ell, the French ell, the fathom, the hand, and the foot. The
Vitruvian Man was drawn to scale, so the units depicted are displayed with
their proper histprical ratios. Image courtesy of Wikipedia
Commons. According to da Vinci’s notes, the following ratios were present in
the male human figure:
Sacred Sequences and Cosmic Codes 51
a palm is the width of four fingers.
a foot is the width of four palms (that is, 12 inches).
a cubit is the width of six palms.
a man’s height is four cubits (and thus 24 palms).
a pace is four cubits.
the length of a man’s outspread arms is equal to his height.
the distance from the hairline to the bottom of the chin is one-tenth of a
man’s height
the distance from the top of the head to the bottom of the chin is one-eighth
of a man’s height.
the maximum width of the shoulders is a quarter of a man’s height.
the distance from the elbow to the tip of the hand is one-fifth of a man’s
height.
the distance from the elbow to the armpit is one-eighth of a man’s height.
the length of the hand is one-tenth of a man’s height.
the distance from the bottom of the chin to the nose is one-third of the
length of the head.
the distance from the hairline to the eyebrows is one-third of the length of
the face.
The famous Last Supper mural depicts the Golden Ratio in art. The Last
Supper is a 15th-century mural painting da Vinci created for his patron Duke
Ludovico Sforza and his duchess Beatrice d’Este. The painting measures
460 by 880 centimeters (15 feet by 29 feet) and is found in the back halls of
the dining hall at Santa Maria delle Grazie in Milan, Italy. In addition to the
Golden Rectangles and decagon, the painting makes references to the
number 3, which most likely represents the Trinity, in the groupings of the
Apostles, the number of windows behind Jesus, and Jesus’ own triangular
shape in the image.
Courtesy of Wikipedia.
Da Vinci also used the Golden Rectangle for the face of his Mona Lisa,
giving her the kind of profile that women today generally pay thousands of
dollars to plastic surgeons for (maybe that’s why she’s smirking!).
According to measurements, the Golden Ratio is present in the ratio of the
width of her forehead compared to the length of the top of her head to her
chin.
Impressionist painter George Seurat, creator of the drawing technique of
pointillism, often used the Golden Section in his works, believing, as da
Vinci did, that this heavenly ratio had an aesthetic value and beauty to which
the human eye was naturally drawn.
Other geometric ratios, although not necessarily designed for aesthetic value,
can be found in Celtic and Indian art, as well as in the design of labyrinths
and mandalas, where symmetry and measurement were intended to create a
spiritual resonance between object and observer. Much to the joy of “circle
watchers”—individuals who study the phenomenon of crop circles— there
have been suggestions that they encompass similar types of geometric ratios.
FIBONACCI
One of the most important and well-known Golden Ratios comes from the
discovery by an Italian with a whole lot of names. Leonardo of Pisa was
born in 1170 AD and went by the names Leonardo Pisano, Leonardo
Bonacci, Leonardo Fibonacci, and finally just Fibonacci. Could you imagine
what his drivers license would look like today? His name comes from
“filius Bonacci,” or “son of Bonac-cio,” a nickname that was originally
given to his father. No matter which name he goes by, Fibonacci is
responsible for the spread of the Hindu-Arabic numeral system into Europe,
as well as the number sequence now named after him.
In his 13th-century book, Book of Calculation , or Liber Abaci , this brilliant
and creative mathematician used the knowledge he had gleaned regarding
the mathematical systems used in the Middle Eastern countries during his
travels throughout Northern Africa. With that knowledge, he went on to
further the development of a previously discovered sequence of numbers
(Indian mathematicians were using the sequence as early as the 6th century
AD) that is now called the Fibonacci sequence— a series of numbers
designed in such a manner that each number after the first two numbers is
the sum of the previous two numbers:
0, 1, 1, 2, 3, 5, 8, 13, 21, 34, 55, 89, 144, and so on . . .
In Liber Abaci , Fibonacci used this sequence as an example of the growth
rate of a hypothetical rabbit population by using a number that showed the
generation-by-generation increase. Beyond rabbits, this sequence is also
found throughout nature as an inherent structural pattern in which the higher
the numbers in the sequence, the closer the two consecutive numbers divided
by each other will approach the Golden Ratio of 1:1.618. In the natural
world, we see the Fibonacci sequence at work in many instances, such as
the branching rate of plants. In several distinct species of flora, not only do
the branch levels follow the pattern but also the spacing of the leaves match
the number sequence! Some of the flower species that follow this pattern are
buttercups, delphiniums, sunflowers, asters, and lilies.
A great many examples of “floral sequencing” can be found online (search
Flower Fibonacci Sequence). One representation involves the purple
passionflower, or passiflora incarnata . On the back of this flower there are
three “sepals,” the nonpetal part of flower, that protect the bud and make up
the outermost layer. This layer is then followed by five outer green petals.
Finally, there is an inner layer of five more paler green petals. On the front
of the flower there are five greenish T-shaped stamens in the center, followed
by three “deep brown carpels and style branches.”
Other examples of the Golden Ratio (or Golden Mean) in nature include the
manner by which lightning branches out, the way a tree spans its branches
for maximum sunlight exposure, the way rivers branch, and even the
proportions of the bodies and wingspans of birds and flying insects.
Snowflakes and crystals also show distinct geometric patterns of formation,
as does the coded “language” of our DNA.
Nature definitely seems to have received more than its fair share of
Fibonacci sequences. The Chambered Nautilus ( Nautilus pompi-lius ),
which is a marine creature of the cephalopod family, grows at a rate that
matches the Fibonacci sequence. This creature has the honor of being partly
responsible for the naming of yet another Fibonacci permutation— the
Fibonacci spiral. This spiral configuration allows the growth of the shelled
creature to be accommo-dated in a logarithmic spiral, without changing its
actual shape as it grows. Honeybees also construct hexagon-shaped cells to
hold their honey stores, which have prompted many scientists to suggest that
the Fibonacci patterns may actually be a logical outcome of natural
principles, rather than the mysterious “signature of the Gods” that many
Sacred Geometrists have labeled them.
3
2
1 1
8
5
The Fibonacci spiral and the pattern in block form. Images courtesy of
Wikipedia.
OTHER SEQUENCES
According to Pythagoras, it was numeric sequences such as this, or numbers
that expressed ratios, that were of far greater importance than the simple
singular units we most often use in our day-to-day lives. Pythagoreans
looked at these mysterious sequences as proof that there was an underlying
layer of reality beneath that which we experienced, and that it was powered
by numbers and the connections between them.
Even when expanded to a more macrocosmic level, there appears to be
ample evidence of sacred patterns at play. The belief that the cosmos
contained a geometric underlying reality is not new, and persists today with
modern science and cosmology. It is believed that Johannes Kepler, the
German astronomer and mathematician, is responsible for promoting a
worldview that combines the sacred with the geometric. Known best for his
laws of planetary motion, Kepler, once an assistant to the brilliant
astronomer Tycho Brahe, often combined his knowledge of astronomy and
astrology while also incorporating aspects of religious, spiritual, and
philosophical arguments into his studies. During Brahe’s time, this was
deeply frowned upon; however, it did not discourage his zeal. He truly
believed that there was an intelligent and divinely created plan to the
universe that could be accessed through reason. This theory, which he
termed “celestial physics,” may have been a supplemental line of study to
Aristotle’s earlier Metaphysics and On the Heavens .
KEPLER
Kepler, whose love of astronomy began early in childhood, was at one time a
theology student and attended seminary, yet he had an intense interest in
astrology. Although the two disciplines may seem to be in opposition,
surprisingly, there are many similarities. Kepler was so skilled in astrology
that he was often called upon by his fellow students to do readings for them.
Due in part to the melding of his understanding of theological and
astrological principles, Kepler later formulated his treatise of a divinely
inspired geometrical reality to the universe. This theory later became known
as the Kepler platonic solid model. Once the basic framework was
established, the view took the form of a sectioned model that showed the
layers of the universe in accordance with his Great Cosmic Mystery, or
“Mysterium Cosmographicum.” This idea deeply reflected his own
excitement for the Copernican system and its potential to bridge both the
physical and the spiritual realms. So certain was he of his beliefs, that he
even published a more detailed follow-up to the “Mysterium” in 1621 to
further elaborate upon his initial writing.
Keplers belief system echoed the popular worldview of the time among
those who believed that the nature of reality was geometrically structured.
This worldview combined the complexities of the best scientific modalities
of the time involving space, matter, and time with religious symbolism and
metaphysical concepts thrown in for good measure. According to this, all of
existence fit together in a pattern, akin to a giant cosmic jigsaw puzzle, and
the creator of this puzzle was the Great Designer. The Great Designer was an
omnipotent entity whose laws operated on a higher order, yet manifested in
the simplest of things, such as the petals of a flower.
SACRED NUMBERS
In his book Sacred Number and the Origins of Civilization , author Richard
Heath states that the four mathematical arts of arithmetic, geometry, musical
harmony, and astronomy comprise the “Quadrivium.” These four elements
were considered essential elements in the building of megalithic monuments.
The idea behind this, again, was that “the field of number provided the
foundation for all these numerical sciences. From this foundation a full
numerical worldview would have been possible— one that found its full-est
expression within the design, location, and structure of ancient monuments.”
But before we venture into a discussion of sacred structures, we first need to
look more closely at the finer intricacies involved in determining the sacred
from the mundane.
Even the realm of music does not escape the inclusion of intricate, number-
based patterns. Harmonics are, at their source, nothing more than simple
mathematical sequences of sound, notes, and chords that create resonance.
Once again, the relationship between geometry, mathematics, and music can
be attributed to Pythagoras.
It was he who, through experimentation, discovered that strings that were
stopped at certain points along their length would produce certain notes or
octaves, and that certain ratios produced intervals that, as Pythagoras
believed, had certain powers of healing.
Followers of Pythagoras believed that musical harmony produced physical
and spiritual harmony. Physician Hans Jenny, while being somewhat
skeptical of the healing powers of music, was a firm believer in the
connection between geometric figures and wave interactions. Jenny’s
research in this field led to the development of cymatics, in which he
elaborated upon ancient knowledge provided by Pythagoras and the ancient
Egyptians.
In his book The Spiritual Technology of Ancient Egypt , noted author and
researcher Edward Malkowski examines how the Pythagorean Science of
Numbers developed to show the relationship between numbers and, as
Aristotle claimed, “the first principles of all things.” Malkowski concludes
that “At the heart of Pythagoras’
science of numbers was the belief that all relationships could be reduced to
number associations, and that all things are in fact number.” This science of
number was discovered through the science, or art, of music. Harmony,
another concept rife with mystical allusions, maintains a close relationship to
resonance and vibration.
This established correlation was thought to be quite simply the basis of the
hidden order of the immediate, perceivable world, and behind it all were the
numbers. It seems that we just can’t escape their grip!
Numbers in Music
In addition to his comprehensive historical research, Malkowski also delves
into the philosophy of numbers as researched by 20th-century French
philosopher R. A. Schwaller de Lubicz. Schwallers early book A Study in
Numbers was published in 1917, and examined numbers as not only symbols
of expression but also as the purist manner to “convey a cosmogony.”
Schwaller believed that quantity was critical, but that only when quantity
and quality were equal could true harmony be achieved. This homeostatic
state would result in an observable, or real, phenomenon. Even
consciousness could be described as “a result of the relationship between
quantities and the absolute state, where we can conceive of absoluteness
only in relation to quantity.”
Schwaller also believed that two cosmos existed in one singular universe;
one being the absolute, macrocosmic, the other the harmonic microcosmic.
He also described this as “quality fragmented and organized into quantity,”
and Malkowski makes the connection between this worldview and physics,
where “there are the immediate and quantum worlds— two very different
worlds that exist simultaneously.” Schwallers ideas were certainly ahead of
their time, and Malkowski describes his philosophical treatise on numbers as
such (obviously mirroring Pythagoras’s “All is number” mentality!):
• One: The Monad— The concept of absolute, the unity of all things, the
unchanging “all” from which all other numbers are produced. Also known as
Chaos, Axis, Tower, Styx, Atlas, and the Throne of Jupiter.
• Two: The Duad— Duality and polarity, the most fundamental aspect of all
natural phenomena (not to mention the foundation for Western religious
belief in good/evil, light/darkness).
• Three: The Triad—The first odd number after one, and the sacred
composition of the monad and duad (think Holy Trinity), the function of
which is to create equilibrium between the monad and duad.
• Four: The Tetrad— The “primogenial number,” the first born of the
combined principles of the three numbers before it. The basis for all nature
in that the tetrad is the sum of 1, 2, 3, and 4 = 10, the decad. The number of
God. The four elements. The four directions.
• Five: The Pentad— The union between the first even (2) and odd (3)
numbers. Symbolized a fifth element known as “ether,” and symbolic of
nature as the Pentacle or five-pointed star.
Pentagrams are considered deeply sacred symbols. Also symbolized the
manifest universe.
• Six: The Hexad— The formation of matter into the cosmos, space, and
time. Six directions of extension (up, down, left, right, forward, and
backward), and the union of the two sexes as in the interlaced triangles of
the Star of David or King Solomon’s Seal. Male and female, matter and
spirit.
• Seven: The Heptad— The mystical nature of Man. The mar-riage of the
threefold nature of mankind (body, mind, and spirit) and the four elements of
matter. Also, the combination of the higher principle of the trinity upon the
lower four “mortal” principles.
• Eight: The Ogdoad— Renewal and self-replication. A new unity based
upon the fact that eight is divided into two 4s, then into two 2s, and then into
two 1s.
• Nine: The Ennead— The first square of the first odd number 3. Spiritual
and mental achievement, the limit of all numbers for all other numbers come
from the first nine, yet can create an infinite amount of new numbers.
• Ten: The Decad— Comprising all arithmetic and harmonic proportions.
The number that perfects all others. Within 10, all nature exists, the root
source of eternal nature.
These ten numbers form the basis of the Pythagoreans’ philosophy,
represented in the “tetractys,” four rows totaling 10 dots where, according to
Malkowski, “the three higher numbers represent the invisible, metaphysical
world, and the lower seven refer to physical phenomena.” The bottom level
consisted of the four elements of earth, water, air, and fire; the center row
was the Three Principles of the Moon, Sun, and Sulfur; and the top two
rows, contained by a triangle, were the Two Seeds of the Moon and Sun,
topped by the One Fruit or Stone. Each row represented a different
experience or reality, “a gradation from more collective to more individual
experiences.” The One Fruit, or Stone, at the top of the tetractys represented
the “Unus Mundus,” or the Self, and is the totality of the universe, or the
World Soul.
The Tetractys. Image courtesy of Wikipedia.
The Pythagorean cosmology consisted of the two worlds of the Supreme and
the Superior, and the lower Inferior World of form, which has three levels
similar to the Trinity as a basis of reality. Yet, only in the Inferior World
could quantity exist and be measured, and that is the world we live in, where
the sacred science of geometry longs to bridge the gap between the lower
and upper worlds, as well as the individual souls to the World Soul.
In his book The Dimensions of Paradise: Sacred Geometry, Ancient Science
and the Heavenly Order on Earth , author and researcher John Michell
examines the role of music and proportion in bridging this gap, as well as the
strong influence of music on the theories of both Plato and Pythagoras. He
begins by looking at Plato’s theory of education, which posits that “children
must be exposed from their earliest days to the influence of harmonious
proportions in everything around them, so that they will grow up with a
sense of proportion and the ability to distinguish between the good and the
meretricious.”
Musical intervals, Michell states, can be expressed as ratios between
numbers, thus creating a sort of “numerical canon” that is the composition
behind the World Soul. From this canon, musical scales evolved. “By
forbidding ‘noise’ as non canonical music,”
Michell continues, “Plato and his ancient forebears intended to preserve the
soul from disruptive influences, nurture it on those sounds that are conducive
to its natural development, and thus produce the type of citizens who will
appreciate and maintain a society constituted in imitation of the cosmos.” A
tall order for its citizens, Platonists believed that they had an obligation to
work with the harmonies of such divinely inspired proportion to be better
people, thus creating a better universe. Imagine a leader today asking our
youth to do the same. Would some forms of modern music, that is, rap,
punk, and thrash metal, constitute an “imitation of the cosmos”?
As Michell points out, Plato strongly believed that the secrets of the universe
were to be found not by setting one’s eyes up to the heavens, but by
examining in detail the “precise proportion of number.” In addition to the
harmonies it inspired, this proportion could only truly be understood through
numerical analysis, which Michell’s book delves into a bit more deeply than
we shall here.
Basically, behind the harmonies and chords and scales that were thought to
be of a positive, or divine, nature, there were numbers and sequences of
numbers that combined to make up notes and half-notes, intervals and
octaves, fourths and fifths, and everything in between.
Harmonic proportion, one of the three recognized types of proportions
(arithmetic and geometric being the others), was deeply understood by
Pythagoreans. Their knowledge carried on a sacred science, which began in
civilizations from far more ancient times.
As Michell states, “Timaeus” is identified as the earliest account of the three
proportion types as part of Pythagorean music theory, “where Plato describes
the numerical creation of the physical universe and the soul that binds and
animates it.”
Plato believed that the World Soul was created out of a range of four
octaves. Furthermore, he said that there was a specific number code that
served as the root of all natural and philosophical reality (which we will
examine in a later chapter). Ironically, through time, scholars have continued
to disagree as to what that exact number code is. Michell and others suggest
that the first 12 numbers are the basic foundation of creation. These
numbers, though, were adapted through time to the units of measurement
that a musician playing a wind or string instrument would produce as sound,
depending upon the length of pipe or string utilized. Anyone who has ever
studied modern music theory, or even tried to learn to read music, knows
that precision and measurement play important roles in the nature and
quality of the sounds produced. Even the human ear can discern a lovely
chord from a distinctly brain-shattering cacophony.
According to Heath’s Sacred Number and the Origins of Civilization ,
musical harmony is comprised of the most fundamental of numbers, 1
through 6, and that “musical ratios are the irreducible elements without any
common factors taken out.” His book extensively describes the harmonic
ratios and octaves created by the numbers 1 through 12, and why these
special combinations and ratios form the foundation of musical structure, a
structure with a parallel in the very resonances of the earth, stars, and planets
that make up the cosmos. These ratios may even govern and influence the
resonances that we, as humans, vibrate in accordance with.
Heath pays particular attention to the importance of certain prime numbers.
“A very important principle emerges within the field of number as it evolves
what is, to us, harmony. As stated, the prime numbers 2, 3, and 5 are
responsible for the principle of harmony; this means that all the higher
primes are fated to occupy the voids left by the field of harmony.” Even the
prime numbers 7 and 11 have a critical role in the formation of “primary
creation,” because, as Heath points out, the ratio between the Earth’s mean
radius and its meridian is 22/7, or two times 11/7, thus giving the two
numbers a special place in the hearts and minds of ancient civilizations who
linked musical harmony with that of the planets and stars.
Metrology
This serves as the foundational platform for the scientific disciple known as
“metrology,” which Heath describes as “similarly structured to find the units
that maintain simplicity of relationship between different dimensions of built
or implied circles.” He ascribes this same simplicity as the manner by which
ancients transmitted knowledge via the building and study of monuments
and temples that were built in accordance with this worldview— think of
Stonehenge and its circular shape. Heath calls this association of number and
harmony, which was seemingly known and utilized by the ancients, the
“metrological application,” and its impact can clearly be seen in the
architecture of old.
Heath, Michell, and John Neal, also an expert in the area of metrology, all
come to similar conclusions about the importance of harmonics in relation to
the physical shape of the earth. Neal and Michell discovered “grid constants”
that reveal, as Heath puts it, “that the shape of the Earth is related to the
harmonic products of the first 25 numbers, seen from the perspective of
harmony, and employing only those prime numbers below 12.” Michell and
Neal’s grid constants found a relationship between variations in ancient
measurements, approximations to pi used in ancient times, and the ratios
found at the end of the series from 1 to 25 with 2, 3, 5, 7, and 11 as
“harmonically generative” primes.
The genesis of metrology may have begun with the simple measurement of
the English foot and its many ancient variations, all of which related to the
size and shape of our planet. However, as Heath points out, the ancients
measured things within a “created scheme or order.” Today, we measure
things as they are actually found in approximation to reality. What you see is
what you get.
This may tell us why sacred geometry is considered a “science” of the past,
but one that still holds great mystery and intrigue today, when our true
understanding of reality is based entirely on what we experience right in
front of us, and rarely on what is occurring beneath the surface, or beyond
the veil.
Much of the worldview upon which sacred geometry is based can be traced
back to concepts forged by the likes of Lao Tsu, author of the Tao Te Ching ,
and even to Socrates, mentor of Plato. Both agreed that the whole of creation
was divided into three parts (also a basis for the Trinity of Catholicism, as
we shall discuss in a future chapter): creation as entirety was the first part;
the division of the whole was the second part; and, finally, the
interconnectedness between the whole and the parts was part three. From
this foundation, all other numbers and number fields supposedly sprang
forth. Nowhere is this more obvious than in the yin and yang symbol of Tao,
which shows the whole of the circle, the division into white and black
halves, and the interconnectedness of the contrary smaller circles within.
This belief in the sacredness of all of creation’s foundational structure was
clearly evident, and quite obvious in architectural objects. Of all the
elements comprising sacred geometry, architecture— whether the building
of a crude stone megalith or a precise and intricately detailed chapel— stood
as the most profound manner by which man could somehow emulate the
divine patterns of the heavens— right here on Earth. Even today, these
sacred structures elicit a deep and lasting impression upon those who view
them.
In the classic Philebus (often called “The Philebus”), one of the last Socratic
dialogues of Plato, Socrates talks of the connection between beauty and
form:
I do not mean by beauty of form such beauty as that of animals or pictures,
which many would suppose to be my meaning, but, says the argument,
understand me to mean straight lines and circles, and the plane or solid
figures which are formed out of them by turning-lathes and rulers and
measures of angles; for these I affirm to be not only relatively beautiful, like
other things, but they are eternally and absolutely beautiful, and they have
peculiar pleasure, quite unlike the pleasures of scratching.
The dialogue’s central question concerns the relative value of pleasure and
understanding, as well as producing a model for thinking about how
complex structures are developed. Called
“philosophical geometry,” this concept also served as the basis for the sacred
geometry we study today.
PLATONIC SOLIDS
To start the discussion of form and beauty with Plato again, let’s review the
five perfect three-dimensional shapes that came to be known as the Platonic
Solids.
Tetrahedron— 4 faces, 4 vertices, 6 edges
Hexahedron (cube)—6 faces, 8 vertices, 12 edges Octahedron— 8 faces, 6
vertices, 12 edges
Dodecahedron— 12 faces, 20 vertices, 30 edges Icosahedron— 20 faces, 12
vertices, 30 edges A Platonic Solid is basically a convex regular polyhedron;
its name is derived from the total number of its faces. The beauty of Platonic
Solids lies in their symmetry and angles. Because of this, they have long
been regarded as sacred. Although some scholars argue that the octahedron
and icosahedron may have been the discovery of Plato’s contemporary,
Theaetetus, who also may be responsible for determining that there are no
other convex regular polyhedra, it was in fact Plato who associated four of
the solids with the four classical elements of earth (hexahedron), water
(icosahedron), air (octahedron), and fire (tetrahedron).
A convex polyhedron can only be a Platonic solid if:
• All its faces are congruent convex regular polygons.
• None of its faces intersect except at their edges.
• The same number of faces meet at each of its vertices.
In the mid-1980s, University of Chicago professor Robert J. Moon managed
to prove that the entire periodic table of elements, of which the entire
physical world is comprised, is based upon the five Platonic Solids. Moon
also proposed a geometric ordering of the atomic nucleus, inspired by
Johannes Keplers conception of the solar system, as described in Keplers
Mysterium Cosmographicum.
Interestingly, Kepler himself tried to apply the five Platonic Solids to the
five known non-Earth planets at the time— Mercury, Venus, Mars, Jupiter,
and Saturn— but was unable to make the connection work. His model of the
solar system was his attempt at a physical correspondence— the innermost
layer was the octahedron, the next layer was the icosahedron, the next layer
was the dodecahedron, the next was the tetrahedron, and finally the last was
the hexahedron, or cube. But all it served to do was inspire his new
discovery of the Kepler solids, and the understanding that planetary orbits
are not circles. Both of these attempts served as the foundation for his
famous Laws of Planetary Motion and an excellent example of failure
leading to greater success!
Proportional harmony, Platonic Solids, and sacred constants all come
together most visibly in the architecture of Ancient Egypt, India, the area
once known as Mesoamerica, Easter Island, and even rural England and
Wales, places often described as magical and mystical by all who have had
the pleasure of walking among their temples, pyramids, megaliths, and
monuments. The designers of sacred sites looked to both earth and sky to
determine locations, alignments, and even purposes. Nothing was ever built
without a purpose, whether that purpose was to better understand our place
in the cosmos, or create a new type of energy or level of consciousness, as
has been suggested as the true purpose of the Great Pyramid of Giza.
SACRED ARCHITECTURE
Other sacred sites were meant to invite worship, but even they were built
with a divine connection to location in mind. The history of sacred
architecture is paralleled by the history of religious architecture, symbolism,
and use of motif, with some buildings purposely rendered huge and public,
while others were small, private places intended for more personal modes of
meditation and reflection. In his article “The Boundary Between the Physical
and the Spiritual,” architect Norman L. Koonce suggested that sacred
architecture served to “make transparent the boundary between matter and
mind, flesh and the spirit,” and this intention is apparent throughout the
ancient world. In his inspiring and beautiful book The Architecture of
Happiness , Alain de Botton states, “Belief in the significance of architecture
is premised on the notion that we are, for better or for worse, different
people in different places— and on the conviction that it is architecture’s
task to render vivid to us who we might ideally be.”
Although it might seem blasphemous, the idea that humankind might
somehow be equal to the gods (or, at the very least, able to access their
wisdom and guidance) serves as the structural foundation for sacred
geometry.
Not surprisingly, dozens of books have been written about the lineage and
age of the Great Pyramid of Giza, the means of construction for the Pyramid,
and even its overall purpose. Some of the more creative theories definitely
seem to stretch the limits of believability. In fact, the somewhat derogatory
term “Pyramidiot” has been penned to describe opponents to the hard-line,
fixed paradigms.
John Michell states in The Dimensions of Paradise , “The pyramid, of
course, was no mere mathematical model, but an example of the cosmic
temple whose traditional function was to procure fusion between upper and
lower elements.”
Just for starters, here is but a small sampling of the enigmatic number
mysteries that the Pyramid contains:
• The ratio of the diameter of the middle of the earth is 11, and the distance
between the center of the earth and the center of the moon as 7 is the exact
ratio built into the Great Pyramid of Giza (Heath).
• The height times the base length, in English feet, is the length of the degree
of latitude for the Pyramid at Giza at 30 degrees North (Neal).
• The cubic capacity of the Ark of the Covenant (71,282 cubic inches) is
incredibly similar to the cubic capacity of the stone vessel knows as
“Pharaoh Cheops’ Sarcophagus” in the King’s Chamber (71,290 cubic
inches), which has led some researchers to suggest that the Ark was once
encased in the Sarcophagus.
• The builders of the Pyramid were apparently aware of the Pythagorean
theorem, of the relationship among the sides of a 3:4:5 (right) triangle, and
they had knowledge of the concept of pi (Malkowski).
• The accuracy and precision of the construction prompted engineering
expert Christopher Dunn to proclaim in his 1998 book The Giza Power
Plant , after closely examining the Pyramid for two decades, that “the Great
Pyramid is the largest, most precisely built, and most accurately aligned
building ever constructed in the world.”
• The angle of the slopes of the sides is a ratio of 10:9, thus for every 10-foot
ascent up the slope of the Pyramid, you rise an altitude of 9 feet. Multiply
the altitude of the Pyramid by 10 raised to the 9th power, and you get
91,840,000 miles— the distance from the earth to the sun.
• A pyramid inch is .001 inch larger than an English inch. There are 24
pyramid inches in a cubit, and there are 365.24 cubits in the square base of
the Pyramid. There are also 365.24 days in a calendar year.
According to Marshall Payn, author of “The Case for Advanced Technology
in the Great Pyramid,” in the book Forbidden History , the Great Pyramid’s
builders most likely looked to the stars and astronomy for their precise
measurements in construction. Even slight inaccuracies could not be
dismissed, Payn suggests, pointing to the minute differences in some
measurements of the Pyramid’s height in feet that closely match the polar
radius of the earth when incorporated into a formula, whereby the base
perimeter is equal to one half of a degree of equatorial longitude. The result
proved to be off by only a difference of twenty-seven miles, yielding an
accuracy of 99.3 percent for the ancient Egyptian builders. Even with the
advent of modern-day GPS, that difference is considered negligible, and
certainly incredible considering the circumstances!
Payn also points to the importance of the number 43,200, which mythologist
and scholar Joseph Campbell traced to the original myths of various ancient
cultures (he even traced it to Neolithic times). This figure is even more
remarkable when we learn that the Great Pyramid’s scale is 2 × 60 × 360,
which equals 43,200.
The Great Pyramid is in no way an exclusive sacred portal of sorts between
earth and heaven. Even the Temple of Luxor speaks of sacred geometric
proportions. Again, we turn to R. A. Schwaller de Lubicz, who
superimposed a human skeleton over a drawing of the temple to show how
sacred geometric proportions were at play.
As outlined in his seminal book, The Temple of Man , Schwaller posits that
the Golden Section was widely used in the construction of the Temple of
Luxor. He believed very strongly that this temple was built to actually
contain and encode a system of knowledge within its architectural
symbolism.
This “science of correspondences,” also attributed to 18th-century Emanuel
Swedenborg, a Swedish scientist, philosopher, Christian mystic, and
theologian, was deeply understood by the ancients, but has effectively been
considered a lost art and science today. Swedenborg believed that “the most
ancient people, who were celestial men, thought from correspondence itself,
as the angels do,” and wrote extensively in his book, Heaven and Hell ,
about the correspondence and connection between the natural world and the
spiritual world.
One such place that elicits an ethereal, spiritual feeling is the Stonehenge-
Avebury Complex. Everyone has heard of Stonehenge, the circle of massive
stones in England’s Wiltshire County, built throughout a period of 3,000
years (the standing stones as early as 2000 BC, the bank and ditch
approximately 3100 BC) that supposedly encode astronomical and
cosmological knowledge in their placement and purpose.
You may be interested to know that Stonehenge, though, is not Britain’s
largest, or even most important, monument. To the direct north is the largest
“henge” monument in the country: Avebury.
Interestingly, Avebury was built upon what is known as the “Michael Line.”
The Michael Line is an invisible geographic line that connects sanctuaries
dedicated to St. Michael (more on this later).
Henge monuments are traditionally defined as “circular banked en-closures
with an internal ditch,” according to Wikipedia, and ar-chaeologists have
long recognized them as a classic form of sacred earthwork. Despite its bank
being inside its ditch, Stonehenge is grouped into such monuments for its
“standing stone circle” formation.
Avebury, along with Stonehenge and other key sacred locations, form a
triangle in the landscape that, according to John Michell, suggest a ground-
based model of the “three key radii of Earth.” The key unit is 1,728 feet,
equaling 72 Roman feet, and one-fourth the radius of nearby Silbury Hill,
another point in the landscape triangle. Michell also compares Stonehenge’s
ground plan with that of the city of “New Jerusalem,” described in Saint
John’s book of Revelation, and with the mystical 12 hides (measurements of
land) of Glastonbury, defined as the area of land able to support a farmer and
his family, and equal to 1,440 acres. Stonehenge, when overlaid upon a
diagram of the city of New Jerusalem (as envisioned by Saint John) can be
seen as a square 7,920 feet wide, and an inner circle of 14,400 cubits around.
The dimensions, Michell states, are on a scale of 1:100. “The outer circle,”
he posits, “has the same perimeter as the square, 316.8 feet. Stonehenge is
thus founded on the classic image of sacred geometry, the squared circle
representing the rec-onciliation of opposites, which is the common feature of
temples and foundation myths the world over.”
St. Mary’s Chapel at Glastonbury also features a similar measurement, with
the perimeter of its square measuring 316.8 feet with a diameter of 79.2 feet.
Michell’s book also shows the diameter of an inner circle representing earth
at 7,920 miles; the perimeter of the outer circle and square as 31,680 miles.
These numbers, as we shall learn later, hold a special sacred spot in the
“pattern of the heavens.”
The ancient “heavenly city” of New Jerusalem of Saint John the Divine in
the book of Revelation is suggested by Michell as the “eternal standard” by
which all other sacred structures should be measured, judged, and even
copied. “In the symbolism of all religions, a geometric construction
representing the heavenly city or map of paradise has a central place,”
Michell writes. “It occurs in sacred art as a mandala, a concentric
arrangement of circles, squares and polygons depicting in essence the entire
universe.” These sacred places were thought to be a fixed constant in a
constantly changing world, a representation of that which never changes.
Many have speculated that these arrangements also served to exert a
calming, ordering influence on civilization.
In Revelation, Saint John actually describes the measurements by which this
heavenly city would be constructed. “And the city lieth foursquare and the
length is as large as the breadth; and he measured the city with the reed,
12,000 furlongs. The length and the breadth and the height of it are equal . . .
and he measured the wall thereof, an hundred and 40 and 4 cubits. . . .”
Michell did the math, so to speak, arriving at specific measurements that
took the form of a cube with 12 sides each, 12,000 furlongs, six faces, 144
million square furlongs, and a wall of 144 cubits. He does point out the dis-
crepancy in scales used, as a furlong is 660 feet and a cubit 1.5 feet.
But “the basic plan of the New Jerusalem is a square of 12 furlongs
containing a circle of 14,4000 cubits.” In feet, the diameter of the New
Jerusalem circle within the square is 7,920 feet. The earth’s diameter in the
square is 7,920 miles. The circumferences of both the New Jerusalem and
the earth measure 24,883.2 feet and miles, respectively, and the perimeter of
the outer square are 31,680 feet and 31,680 miles, respectively.
No matter the numbers, the whole idea was to match the measurement of
what was being constructed upon the earth with the earth itself, as if in
homage. Perhaps it was also an attempt to reign in the power of the earth’s
harmonics and resonance by creating a microcosmic “earth” as a city. The
idea behind the city of New Jerusalem was obviously an attempt to bridge
the gap between “as above, so below.” This pattern became the blueprint for
other sacred sites, many of which, such as Stonehenge and Avebury, were
spaced equidistant along a very magical line.
LEY LINES
The St. Michael Line that joins Avebury, one of the largest Neolithic henge
monuments in Europe dating back as far as 5,000 BC, to Stonehenge and
other noted sacred sites is called a “ley line,” a straight alignment that
measures across England from Cornwall to East Anglia. Discovered by John
Michell, the St. Michael Line is said to be the most widely known ley line in
the world, linking several “holy” sites devoted to St. Michael. With St.
Michael’s Mount at the southern tip, the line dissects through the Hurlers
stone circle, Glastonbury (site of the Tor megalith), Avebury, and the Wan-
dlebury Stone Ring to Hopton in the north.
Ley lines, leys, or Magic Lines are purported alignments of sacred sites,
usually ancient in origin, that connect across a landscape in either a straight
or curved line. Ley lines often link marker sites along several miles, and it
has been thought that they might possibly follow the paths of prehistoric
trading routes.
The so-called “discoverer” of ley lines is considered to be the English
businessman Alfred Watkins, who allegedly found evidence of these
alignments in June 1921 while studying a map. He noticed that various
points of historical interest followed a line that traversed across hilltops and
created a pattern of lines across a vast landscape. In his book The Old
Straight Track, Watkins described a ley line as having “a set of points,
chosen from a given set of land-mark points, all of which lie within at least
an arc of 1/4 degree.” He urged readers to “imagine a fairy chain stretched
from mountain peak to mountain peak, as far as the eye could reach.” This
chain linked mounds, circular earthwork, and “high places” of the earth at
various spaced locales.
Watkins associated the lines with the Roman messenger god Mercury (Greek
Hermes), the god of communication, boundar-ies, and guide to travelers.
Watkins also felt there was a Druidic connection to the ley lines, and later
wrote a book entitled the Ley Hunters Manual in the late 1920s. However, it
was Dion Fortune, the occultist and author of The Goat-Foot God who
originated the claim that ley lines held a special power that linked ancient
holy sites.
Later, the New Age crowd ascribed a sense of cosmic energy to ley lines,
determining that the lines followed a specific grid or pattern in the earth
itself. Dowsers and psychics alike claimed to be able to “read” and locate ley
lines, which also became linked to the Atlantean mythology courtesy of
author John Michell’s book, The View Over Atlantis .
Allegedly, there are ley lines running across the landscapes of western North
America (many linked to Native American sites), the southeastern United
States, the Glastonbury-Avalon line in the United Kingdom, the Glasgow
lines of Scotland, and the south of France linking various holy sites
associated with the Mary Magdalene legend. Wales and Ireland also have
their share of ley lines, magical sites, and hot spots of mythical interest. The
Nazca lines in South America are considered ley patterns, and these
mysterious lines are even said to connect the ancient pyramids of Mexico.
Of course, not everyone believes in the mystical concepts ascribed to ley
lines. According to Skepdic.com , “There is no evidence for this belief save
the usual subjective certainty based on uncontrolled observations by
untutored devotees. Nevertheless, advocates claim that the alleged energy is
connected to changes in magnetic fields. None of this has been scientifically
verified.”
Are ley lines simply random? Those lines that are actually straight (most are
not) can be shown to fall within expected chance occurrence on a map of a
heavily populated area, especially when features no longer in existence can
be included.
A similar notion was developed by the ancient Chinese far before the
English came up with it. The Chinese called their lines “dragon tracks,” and
they used them for weather forecasting. They were somewhat less successful
in that field than today’s average meteorologist.
Regardless of the lack of scientific evidence either for or against ley lines, a
new, emerging area of archeology called “geodesy” has formed, which
incorporates geological surveying as a factor. This modality suggests that
these lines are nothing more than humankind’s attempts to mark surveying
lines, property and boundary markers, as well as the most commonly
traveled trade and migra-tion routes.
Watkins himself never attributed any metaphysical or supernatural meaning
to ley lines; however, the belief persists today that lines of energy that
resonate in the same electromagnetic vibrational frequency as the earth itself
mark the landscape and speak of an ancient knowledge far superior to our
own. No matter what the origin of these lines, it is really the sites to which
they point that continue to intrigue those interested in hidden knowledge and
the power and symbolism of numbers.
One of the most interesting end points of ley lines is the famous Rosslyn
Chapel, itself a remarkable display of sacred geometry and the use of
symbol, harmonics, and numbers to convey a sense of otherworldliness and
a divine connection.
Rosslyn Chapel is a 15th-century chapel designed by William Sinclair of the
St. Clair family of Scottish nobles descended from the Norman knights, and
some claim, linked to the Knights Templar. Originally known as the
Collegiate Chapel of St. Matthew, Rosslyn has gained notoriety from the
recent bestselling book and movie The Da Vinci Code by Dan Brown, which
served to further inextricably link it to the legend of the Holy Grail. Many
historians and esotericists even insist the Grail legend itself ends at Rosslyn,
where ensconced deep within its walls may lie a secret that only music itself
can unlock.
The chapel’s construction began in 1440 and lasted for approximately forty
years. Throughout its history, Rosslyn Chapel has been associated with
mystery and intrigue as well as the occult and hidden knowledge. Such
collegiate chapels were intended to be both spiritual and educational places
of power and knowledge, but as suggested in a three-volume study by Father
Richard Augustine Hay, Rosslyn held even deeper mysteries. Hay was the
principle authority of the chapel and St. Clair family. He wrote that Rosslyn
was unlike any other house of God’s service, and that it was a “most curious
work, that which it might be done with greater glory and splendour.” Sir
William is said to have engaged the services of the best masons and
workmen available in Europe at the time to build this magnificent structure.
Throughout its history, the chapel has maintained an association with the
legendary Knights Templar.
According to theologians, that association continues even today.
Many authors and Rosslyn researchers suggest that the west wall of the
chapel was intended by design to be a model of Jerusalem’s Wailing Wall. In
addition, mystical symbols carved into the stone ceiling were reportedly
discovered in 2005, which appear to be a musical score. Stuart Mitchell
undertook this genius accomplishment, finding codes hidden in 213 cubes in
the ceiling. The cubes, when combined, formed a series of patterns that
resulted in a one-hour musical accompaniment for 13 medieval prayers!
When the composer also discovered that the stones at the foot of 12 pillars
formed a classic 15th-century cadence (three chords at the end of a musical
piece), he suggested that the music sounded like a “nursery rhyme,” a
childlike tune that would have been more fitting of a man like William
Sinclair. A man who may have been a great architect, but a lousy musician!
Mitchell is himself the son of Thomas Mitchell, who spent more than two
decades trying to unravel the musical code on the chapel ceiling. Stuart’s
recording of the mysterious musical notes is called The Rosslyn Motet, and
it is his hope, among other researchers, that when played on medieval
instruments, it will create a resonant frequency throughout the chapel similar
to a Cymatic or Chladni pattern, which form when a sustained note vibrates
a sheet of metal covered in a powder. The frequency creates a pattern in the
powder, and different musical notes produce different patterns such as
rhombuses, flowers, dia-monds, hexagons, and other shapes . . . all of which
were found on the Rosslyn ceiling cubes!
Many scholars insist that these musical tones and corresponding patterns on
the ceiling cubes are far more than just coincidence, and that one day we
may be able to unlock a medieval secret by repeatedly playing the proper
frequencies. So far, the musical mystery remains just that.
Perhaps William Sinclair was familiar with sacred geometry and harmonics,
and utilized them in the building of this magical, mystical chapel. Two of the
chapel’s pillars are believed by Masons to refer to the pillars of Boaz and
Joachim, and there are pictorial references on wall carvings to the Key of
Hiram, as well as to certain plant species that are found only in America—
and which would not be officially discovered for some one hundred years or
more.
Some legends state that a huge treasure of amazing proportions, perhaps the
Holy Grail itself, lies hidden in the sealed chambers below the chapel’s
basement floor. It has been said that within the chapel, three giant medieval
chests are filled with shocking contents that might change our entire
religious history. Others believe the secret lies within the stone walls
themselves, ripe with symbolism and hidden meaning. Perhaps one day, the
correct series of musical notes may reveal to us the secrets of Rosslyn.
Chapter 4:4 SIGNS AND SYMBOLS
In a symbol there is concealment and yet revelation: here therefore, by
silence and by speech acting together, comes a double significance. In the
symbol proper, what we can call a symbol, there is ever, more or less
distinctly and directly, some embodiment and revelation of the Infinite; the
Infinite is made to blend itself with the Finite, to stand visible, and as it
were, attainable there. By symbols, accordingly, is man guided and
commanded, made happy, made wretched.
—Thomas Carlyle
“Stop.” “No right turn.” “Yield.” Fortunately for our insurance carriers, most
of us are familiar with the various signs and symbols utilized in modern
transportation. Although sometimes aggravating, they serve a valuable and
important purpose. Throughout millennia, mankind has developed and
assigned signs and symbols as representative depictions of nearly everything
of significance.
SYMBOLS
The word symbol has its roots in the Greek term symbolon , which means
“contract, token, insignia, and a means of identification.”
Symbols are objects, pictures, or other visual representations of ideas,
concepts, or abstractions. For example, in the United States, Canada,
Australia, and Great Britain, a red octagon is a symbol for “STOP.” And here
in the United States and now abroad, a pair of golden arches signifies a
burger. Signs and symbols have allowed us to use readily identifiable
monikers and icons as representations of the original item.
Signs, symbols, and glyphs have been used for religious and occult purposes
from the very beginning of time. Early rock and cave art depictions present a
fascinating view into the minds of our prehistoric ancestors. Many theories
abound regarding the purpose of these creative signs— some have ascribed
them to ceremonial purposes, while others believe that they were utilized as
a means to transmit information. Whatever the true explanation, they remain
a mysterious and enigmatic part of the human experience.
Religion
Religious use of symbology has likewise been commonly employed
throughout history. On a daily basis we are confronted by a virtual
cacophony of sacred religious icons such as the Christian cross, the Jewish
Star of David, the Islamic crescent, the Buddhist Wheel of Dharma, and so
on. With the modern societal belief in cultural and religious diversity,
suburbia has an increasing number of billboards and street corners dedicated
to churches, synagogues, mosques, and other places of holy worship.
NUMBERS
Even our favorite topic of numbers is not immune from the influence of
signs and symbols. Math iconography has generally been used to express
mathematical statements in an easily understood, plain language. Lancelet
Hogben, the famous English statistician and writer said:
Every meaningful mathematical statement can also be expressed in plain
language. Many plain-language statements of mathematical expressions
would fill several pages, while to express them in mathematical notation
might take as little as one line. One of the ways to achieve this remarkable
compression is to use symbols to stand for statements, instructions and so
on.
Many of the world’s most mysterious and sacred places also employ signs,
symbols, and numerology as representative icons. From the ancient to the
modern world, such wonders as the Great Pyramid of Giza, Stonehenge,
Easter Island, Machu Picchu, the Taj Mahal, and even the Rosslyn Chapel all
contain within their very structures symbols purposely inscribed to reveal a
higher, secret knowledge to those who are willing to look for them. And
more times than not, that knowledge has a connection with numbers.
We even have a symbol for numbers themselves: #. The relationship
between symbols and numbers is inescapable.
THE TRIAD
Numbers, whether in plain digit form or represented as arcane symbols, have
had a profound influence on religion the world over.
One of the most well-known symbols is that of “three”—referred to as a
triad.
A triad, a group of three, may refer to:
• Greek philosophy: The Pythagorean symbol for the number 3.
• Music: A set of three notes, most commonly forming a dia-tonic tertian
chord.
• Relationship: A term for a relationship between three people.
• Religious: Three deities commonly associated together; three deities
forming a group with common associations; three deities thought of as three
phases of one deity; or three entities thought of as aspects of one deity (for
example, the “great goddess,” or Triple Goddess: grandmother, mother, and
daughter; crone, matron, and maiden; and, in Catholicism: father, son, and
spirit); triple deities.
• Sociology: A term for a group of three people as a unit of study.
Most notably, the triad holds great importance in many religions, from the
most ancient Pagan traditions to modern Taoism and Christianity. The power
of “three” is seemingly everywhere!
In fact, every major and minor religious system has a similar triadic concept
that does one of two things: (1) describes the nature of reality, or (2)
describes the path to enlightenment. Only semantics separate these
worldwide concepts from what could be termed a “spiritual unified theory,”
which can be explored and em-braced by people no matter what their
claimed religion or belief system.
Cosmology
In the ancient Sumerian culture, cosmology was an integral and important
part of daily life. Their cosmology centered on the Enuma Elish , an epic
poem about the creation of the gods, as well as all other forms in existence.
The Elish would later become a framework for many themes found in
mystical Judaism and Islam.
The story begins with Nammu, the primeval sea and Mother of all, who
created heaven ( an ) and earth ( ki ). According to the story, when the hard
metallic shell of the sky was separated and raised above earth by the God
Enlil, a third layer of existence opened up, which has the great waters of
Nammu. Thus we have one of the first images of a triadic structure of
existence on record. From this triadic primordial mess, the substance of
which had been in existence for all eternity, the gods themselves emerged
two-by-two, and the parade of creation began.
According to Gerald A. LaRue in Ancient Myth and Modern Life , this idea
of a three-tiered structure found its way into ancient Greek, Egyptian, and
even Hebrew creation myths.
In the Egyptian legend, heaven and earth were separated by water. In the
Hebrew myth, it was air. Always the mysterious sort, the Babylonians
espoused the “Abyss.” These and other similar ancient creation myths would
eventually develop into more symbolic descriptions of the universe, such as
the Shamanic belief in the Lower World, Middle World, and Upper World,
and the much later Christian concept of heaven, hell, and purgatory. Now, if
you were paying attention, and not still pondering Mr. Hogben’s name, you
may have noticed that all of those concepts were based on the triadic system
of three.
Paganism and Shamanism
Ancient Paganism and Shamanism suggest that even within the realm of a
genderless divinity, there were still three levels of existence with which
humans would be forced to contend: the physical, mental, and spiritual.
These three could be more easily termed as body, mind, and spirit. Again,
the power of three!
Even Neo-Platonists understood this basic Hermetic Law: As Above, So
Below. Earth-based religions understood the connection between man,
nature, and the creative force behind it all. Using sacred rituals, herbs,
chanting, and cadence, Shamans journeyed through the vast realms of the
Lower World, where the basest primal existence occurred, the Middle World
of day-to-day existence, and the Upper World where superior guidance and
knowledge was available. At least 40,000 years before the dawn of
Christianity, Shamanic peoples understood that the only way to wholeness
and connection with the creative force was to be able to move easily
between the Triple Worlds. They believed that in order to enter the realm of
pure spirit, they needed the ability to transcend the limits of the physical
body and mind.
Were these ideas the precursors of later concepts of God, Man, and Holy
Spirit? Were they forerunners of the concepts of Id, Ego, and Superego as
introduced by Freud and later reconstructed to indicate the subconscious,
conscious, and super conscious? And what about the Buddhist concepts of
Personhood, Mindfulness, and Nirvana? Or the metaphysical suggestion of
Self, Conscious Awareness, and Higher Self? Even the much more recent
concepts of Right Brain/Intuitive, Left Brain/Analytical, and Third
Eye/Spiritual may have its underpinnings in these ideas.
Egyptian Beliefs
The ancient myths and stories of creation, including the Egyptian tale of the
Reigning Queen as Mother of God, the Reigning Pharaoh as Sun God or
Father immanent in the flesh among men, and the Heir Apparent (Prince) as
the Son both of God and God to be, all speak of a triadic structure upon
which man could understand not only the way the world around him was
made, but the way he, himself was made and meant to express his being.
This idea of expression would repeat itself throughout history, from Queen,
Pharaoh, and Prince/Son; to Buddha, Dharma, Sangha; to God, Christ, and
Adam; to Father, Son, and Holy Spirit; to today’s popular notion of Me,
Myself, and I.
Christianity
Perhaps the most obvious physical Trinity occurs in Christianity, where the
Father, Son, and Holy Spirit are first described as actual beings. The Father
is God, the Son is the Christ—also called Son of God and Son of Man—and
the Holy Spirit is often described in the New Testament as a “presence,
which descended upon” whomever was the lucky chosen. But even the
Christian church in its earliest configuration had issues with the simplistic,
physical-oriented Trinity. If Jesus was the Son, yet also the Word ( Logos )
made flesh, was he, too, God? Was Christ made of the same nature as God?
And who or what was the Holy Spirit?
When the early church bishops gathered at the Council of Ni-caea in the year
325 AD, they actually resolved (although there were a few dissenters) this
questioning by creating the Apostle’s Creed.
This historic meeting decided that from that point on, it would be officially
stated that the Creator and the Redeemer were one and the same. At this
point, the Trinity became less a physical reality and more a spiritual symbol
representing a path to divine union, with God as the Father Almighty, the
Son of God as Lord Jesus Christ, and the Holy Spirit as the binding agent, so
to speak.
Yet even as Christianity developed, and as Gnostic and Mystical Christianity
began to grow, the somewhat physical concept of One God, One Son (Jesus),
and some mysterious third “entity” named the Holy Spirit began to expand
into something more symbolic, and less material. This was likely due in part
to the natural evolution of human thought and spiritual unfoldment.
This and other similar thoughts would be echoed in the ancient Eastern
wisdom schools as well. The Bhagavad Gita, long considered the exemplary
text of the Hindu culture, states in its Eigh-teenth Teaching:
There is no being on earth or among the gods in heaven free from the triad of
qualities that are born of nature.
In his introduction to Barbara Stoler Millers translation of The Bhagavad
Gita , Huston Smith states that, “To uncover the nature of the self, the Gita
approaches it from three directions that trian-gulate the self. . . . One of these
concerns its makeup, its attributes or qualities. A second distinguishes
different spiritual attitudes that serve as starting points for the journey to
God . . . the third system of classification turns on differences in what grabs
people’s interests in the world.” All three attributes, as per Huston, create a
model of the human self and the psychological and spiritual nature.
Even the various aspects of Krishna’s material nature are described as triadic
and are analyzed in terms of the three fundamental qualities of lucidity (
sattva ), passion ( rajas ), and dark inertia ( tamas ). These three natural
qualities are what constitute, in Hindu thought, the nature of man. Note here
the similarities to the Id, Ego, and Superego concept of Freud! Was Freud’s
famous theory possibly based upon the Hindu teachings?
Looking closely, one can even see a parallel here with the later Christian
concept of heaven, hell, and purgatory. Krishna tells Ar-juna in the Gita’s
Fourteenth Teaching: Men who are lucid go upward; men of passion stay in
between; men of dark inertia, caught in vile ways, sink low.
The triadic nature of Hindu faith is also made up of these three elements,
inherent in the embodied self, and this trinity of lucidity, passion, and dark
inertia presents itself throughout The Bhagavad Gita as a symbol of the three
levels of man’s nature, both physical and spiritual.
Chinese Belief
In the Tao Te Ching , the centerpiece of all Chinese religion and philosophy,
we see a close parallel between the Tao teaching of te (individual soul), Tao
(universal or cosmic soul), and chi (universal energy), and the older Hindu
Vedic concept of atman (individual soul), Brahman (universal soul), and
Moksha (liberation). Tao and Brahman both represent Cosmic Unity, or the
Father. The individual soul as represented by te and atman can also be called
the Son.
And as for the Holy Spirit, we offer chi energy present in all things, or for
the Vedic Hindus, a pure liberation or freedom of the soul.
The Tao teachings of the Yan Hui, one of Confucius’s disciples, also include
the idea that the human being and cosmos share three life-forces: spirit (
shen ), breath ( qi ), and vital essence ( jing ), also known as the “Three Pure
Ones.” This personification of the triadic nature of being is echoed in every
tradition from the East, with only slight variations in presentation and
semantics.
Chinese Buddhism presents the trinity concept as present throughout
spiritual teachings as the Three Jewels: Buddha, Dharma , and Sangha , or
the God-Head, his teachings, and his community (also referred to as the
Teacher, His Teaching, and the freedom the teachings inspire). These three
jewels symbolized the actions to be taken to achieve union with the Divine,
and was a common concept throughout Eastern thought; it was even
paralleled in the Jain religion with the trinity of samyag-darsana (correct
perception of insight), samyagjnana (correct knowledge), and samyag-
caritra (correct conduct).
Thich Nhat Hanh emphasizes the need for a budding Buddha to live from the
teachings of the Three Jewels, and in his book Living Buddha, Living Christ
urges those seeking enlightenment to understand that “every moment is an
opportunity to breathe life into the Buddha, the Dharma , and the Sangha .
Every moment is an opportunity to manifest the Father, Son, and Holy
Spirit.” Thus, the concept of Buddha as a physical deity, Dharma as a
physical reality of right action, and Sangha as a physical community or
the “body of man” is transformed into symbols of inner transformation,
where the inner God uses inner right thought and action to achieve a
community of spirit. This is what Hanh means when he emphasizes that we
can “touch the living Buddha and the living Christ” within each of us.
In Robert Thurman’s translation of the Tibetan Book of the Dead, we see a
triad appear in the Tibetan Buddhist concept of Three Bodies of
Buddhahood: (1) Truth Body, associated with the ultimate reality; (2)
Beatific Body, the subjective and transcendent wisdom aspect; and (3)
Incarnational Emanation Body, the physical manifestation. In this we see a
powerfully obvious match-up with the Christian Trinity of the ultimate
Father God, the subjective Holy Spirit that permits transcendence, and the
Son who is the physical manifestation that embodies the other two.
Thurman draws a beautiful correspondence between the Buddha bodies and
the processes of life (Emanation Body), death (Truth Body), and the
Between (Beatific Body). For many Christians of the Western World, these
correspondences can also be applied to heaven (Death), earth (Life), and
purgatory (what lies between), with Death being the ultimate permanent
union with the Divine (and appearing to be somewhat more “superior” than
life, at least to the Buddhists!).
Hanh also constantly refers to the parallels between the Buddhist
foundational practice of the Three Jewels of Buddha, Dharma , and Sangha ,
and the Trinity of the Christian church. The common symbolism is not lost
on Hanh, who suggests that just as taking refuge in the Three Jewels is at the
foundation of every Buddhist practice, taking refuge in the Trinity is at the
foundation of every Christian practice.
Other Ways of the Trinity
Meanwhile, Gnostic Christian texts would bring the feminine face of God
into the fray. Author and scholar Elaine Pagels recounts a passage from the
Apocryphon of John, which tells of a mystical vision of the Trinity he
experienced while grieving for the Crucified Christ: “. . . and I was afraid,
and I saw in the light . . . a likeness with multiple forms, and the likeness had
three forms.” John questions the vision and receives this answer: “I am the
one who is with you always. I am the Father; I am the Mother; I am the
Son.”
Pagels explains that this version of the Trinity is based upon the Hebrew
term for spirit, ruah , which is a feminine word, thus concluding that the
feminine “person” conjoined with the Father and Son must be the Mother.
Another feminine Trinity symbol appears in the Gospel according to Philip,
which describes the Holy Spirit as Mother and Virgin, consort to the
Heavenly Father. Philip believes this is the true account for the Virgin Birth
symbolism of Christology, “Christ, therefore, was born from a virgin,”
meaning from the Holy Spirit, not from a virgin woman named Mary.
Pagels also suggests that Wisdom (Sophia) could have also served as the
feminine aspect of the Trinity. Sophia, wisdom, translates a Hebrew
feminine term, hokhmah , and refers to the saying in Prov-erbs, “God made
the world in Wisdom.”
Sefirot
Jewish mystics who studied the Kabbalah also understood the triadic
symbolism of their Christian counterparts. It was the Hebrew God Yahweh,
after all, that the early Christian Church was trying to define by adding the
Trinitarian nature. In the Kabbalah, a more metaphysical understanding of
the nature of God, the All, Ein Sof , takes form in the three major sefirot , or
the qualities through which the Divine emanates and performs its actions.
The first major emanation is Keter , also called Ayin , Nothingness. From
Keter a second point emanates, Hokmah (wisdom) also called Yesh , Being.
This sefirah is the beginning of being-from-nothingness, the beginning of
revelation and existence. The third point of emanation is Binah ,
Understanding, which is required to reveal that which exists. From these
three sefirot emerge the six dimensions of providence.
Each group of sefirot is revealed in triads from a sefira before it; for
example, Hesed (Love) emanated from Hokhmah (Wisdom); Gevurah
(Power) from Binah (Understanding); and Tiferet (Beauty) from Keter
(Nothingness). Kabbalists claim that it is improper to probe the essence of
the first three sefirot because they constitute the Divine Mind, Wisdom, and
Understanding. Note the parallel here with the early Greek Christian
Orthodox church’s claim that the true nature of the Divine was
unexplainable, thus the need for a more symbolic interpretation of the
Trinity.
Kabbalah
Kabbalists understood the Ein Sof as the Infinite, from which all else
emanated, including humankind. In “The Chain of Being” from The
Essential Kabbalah by Daniel C. Matt we are told, “The entire chain is one.
Down to the last link, everything is linked with everything else; so divine
essence is below as well as above, in heaven and on earth. There is nothing
else.” And then, in “Ein Sof and You,” we learn that “each of us emerges
from the Ein Sof and is included in it. We live through its dissemination.”
The Ein Sof is the Father of the Christian world. We are the Sons. And the
dissemination of the Ein Sof is the Holy Spirit that moves in and through us.
As Rabbi Eliazar ben Judah of Worms, Jewish mystic and philosopher,
proclaimed in “The Song of Unity” in Gershom Sholem’s Major Trends in
Jewish Mysticism :
Everything is in Thee and Thou art in everything: Thou fillest everything
and dost encompass it: when everything was created Thou was in
everything; before everything was created, Thou was everything.
Another concept of Kabbalah is the Supernal Triad. According to the
Universal Kabbalah Network ( www.universalkabbalah.net ): The Supernal
Triad is very much like the Celtic trinity knot; there are three aspects, yet
they are all interwoven such that the three are one and the energy flow
between them is un-broken. While there are three aspects, they occur
simultaneously with Kether being the initial spark, Chokmah being the flame
that extends out, and Binah like the holder that contains the flame, allowing
its light to emanate out but not its destructiveness.
This triadic concept of unity is very interesting, and, it would seem likely
that it has served as the basis for diverse religious iconography. Again, from
the Universal Kabbalah Network: The supernals are the “3 mothers”
associated with the Hebrew Letters Shin (spirit/fire), Aleph (air), and Mem
(water), which are also the 3 mother rays of Amon Ra: numbers, letters, and
sounds that are used to write the name of God, from which all creation
comes. The third ray, Binah (Mem), being the one from which all other rays
and creational energies are birthed or emanated out from. We see this in the
Kabbalah by the path that the lightning bolt or “flaming sword” takes as it
carries the creational energies down from source to Malkuth. Binah is the
last of the supernals that it enters before coming into the lower realms. Thus,
Binah is the closest of the supernals to the world of form; hence it is the
original archetypal form, whereas Chokmah is the original archetypal force.
These roles of form and force can also be explained through the beginning
stages of creation.
Unlike its sister religions of Judaism and Christianity, Islam considered the
Trinity a blasphemous concept. To the followers of the Koran, trying to
speculate on things theologically was referred to, somewhat
condescendingly, as Zanna. This term translates roughly to “self-indulgent
guesswork about things that cannot possibly be known,” and perfectly
describes their disdain for theological pondering.
The idea of a triadic nature of God was definitely not something Muslims
accepted, or would even consider. To the Muslim, God, or Allah, was all, is
all, and will always be all there is.
Muhammad the Prophet, who supposedly channeled the Koran in a series of
trance states, considered the Koran the word of God directly translated to
Arabic. According to the Koran, Allah was indivisible All. This emphasis on
total and complete oneness would turn the Islamic churches away from the
Trinity doctrine em-braced in nearby Christian churches. According to
author Karen Armstrong, a former Roman Catholic nun turned religious
scholar, the Christian Incarnation of Christ was also blasphemous to the
Islamic Church. Instead, the Koran spoke of an impersonal God who cannot
be personified, but only glimpsed through signs of nature and contemplation
of the Koran itself.
Images of the triune nature of God and reality abound in religious traditions,
from ancient Celtic Paganism to Christianity. Top left: a triskele; top right: a
trefoil; bottom left: a triquetra; and bottom right: a shield trinity. Images
courtesy of Wikipedia Commons.
FAIRY TALES
Remember Goldilocks? She crashed the home of the Three Bears.
How about our friend the troll, who made trouble for the Three Billy Goats
Gruff? The Three Blind Mice tried to escape an old lady’s wrath. The Three
Little Pigs learned about the effects of wind on housing materials. Fairy
tales, long a staple of folkloric studies, prominently display a preference for
certain numbers, namely the number 3. From the three notes played by the
Pied Piper, to Cin-derella and her two ugly stepsisters, to three wishes, three
tasks, and three corners to go around, the prevalence of the number 3 in the
stories, which in certain cultures conveyed knowledge, taught lessons, and
entertained children all in one fell swoop, cannot be ignored. We can even
see this pattern in the Arthurian tales of the quest for the Holy Grail, not to
mention the story of the Three Wise Men of the Christian Bible.
Some experts believe this is because of the structure of story itself; every
story has a beginning, middle, and end. Within this framework, the story
unfolds, as a “hero’s journey” of sorts, that involves, as Joseph Campbell
once put it, an initiation, a quest, and a resolution. These three stages permit
the magic of 3 to appear yet again!
But perhaps it is our Indo-European background that provides us with this
triadic pattern. If so, was this designed expressly to challenge the usual
dichotomies of good and evil, night and day, black and white, rich and poor,
and so on? According to Herb Buckland in “The Number Three—Folklore-
Fantasy-Fiction?” if we hold to the Out of Africa theory, it can be suggested
that we are all third generational descendants, with Africans being the first
line of descendancy, Asians the second, and the Indo-Europeans the third.
These cultural explanations parallel the idea that even in the world of
science, and our own bodies, we see the triadic pattern, as in our DNA,
RNA, and proteins.
There may be a subtler, archetypal reason for the number 3 in fairy tales and
stories. With each of the three challenges, the ante is upped, requiring more
of our hero or heroine. With each bear or pig, there is a greater problem, and
a better solution to solve the problem. Let us not forget our favorite
ignoramuses— the three stooges. With each third wish, the chance for three
more. . . . After all, we are the third planet from the sun.
Signs and Symbols 97
Fairy tales and stories don’t just stop at the number 3. Persian legends speak
of seven caverns that aspirants must move along during their seventy years
on earth. We tell tales of the seven seas.
And who can forget The House of the Seven Gables? Egyptian legend tells
of The Seven Hathors, fairy godmothers that bestow certain fate upon
newborn babies. In the Talmud, we have seven stages of a man’s life: the
infant, the child, the boy, the young man, the married man, the parent, and
the old man. Shakespeare wrote of the seven stages of a man’s life in his
play, As You Like It : The Seven Ages of Man, by William Shakespeare All
the world’s a stage, And all the men and women merely players: They have
their exits and their entrances; And one man in his time plays many
parts, His acts being seven ages. At first the infant, Mewling and puking in
the nurse’s arms. Then the whining school-boy, with his satchel And shining
morning face, creeping like snail Unwillingly to school. And then the lover,
Sighing like furnace, with a woeful ballad Made to his mistress’ eyebrow.
Then a soldier, Full of strange oaths, and bearded like the pard, Jealous in
honor, sudden and quick in quarrel, Seeking the bubble reputation Even in
the cannon’s mouth. And then the justice, In fair round belly with good
capon lined, With eyes severe and beard of formal cut, Full of wise saws and
modern instances; And so he plays his part. The sixth age shifts Into the lean
and slipper’d pantaloon, With spectacles on nose and pouch on side, His
youthful hose, well saved, a world too wide For his shrunk shank; and his
big manly voice, Turning again toward childish treble, pipes And whistles in
his sound. Last scene of all, That ends this strange eventful history, Is second
childishness and mere oblivion, Sans teeth, sans eyes, sans taste, sans every
thing.
—As You Like It, act 2, scene 7
In her book The Interpretation of Fairy Tales, psychologist Marie-Louise
von Franz suggests that number patterns in fairy tales are clues and may
possibly be indicative of ancient patterns of destiny that mark a natural
rhythm to events. This rhythmic pattern no doubt applies to our own lives
and, as Dame Anita Roddick stated in Numbers , there might just be a
numeric pattern or combination of patterns that “predict the futures we are
hurtling towards.”
So there is a reason why the king has three daughters, the cock crows three
times, the three little kittens keep losing their mittens, and the three ships sail
into the harbor each morning at Christmas-time; a reason that cannot be
foreseen except in the murky mists of future time.
In addition to our friendly number 3, the numbers 1 and 2 also hold great
significance in religious traditions (as well as in mythology and folklore).
The number 1 represents the ultimate unity, God, the Divine. This is the
number that unites all others into wholeness. One need only think about the
symbol of interlocking wedding rings to give the idea of two becoming one,
or the Star of David, combining the masculine and feminine triangles in one
ex-traordinarily sacred symbolic image. Even with the importance of this
uniting icon, the number 2, representing duality, is present here as well. And
the number 3, of such huge importance, cannot exist without these two
numbers coming before it, merging to create a complete tri-fold identity.
Similar to the yin and yang symbol, the two halves combine to produce the
one, whole unit. In the next chapter, we will also look at other numbers of
significance; however, when it comes to symbols and signs, few hold the
kind of power over us as the first three, literally defining our reality as body,
mind, and spirit; earth, water, and sky; birth, life, and death. In occult
traditions, the number 5 takes on metaphysical importance, embodying the
image of the human body, with limbs outspread, as in the famous Vitruvian
Man of da Vinci fame. The pentagram, a mystical prime number that
combines the sum of 2 and 3, 1 and 4, has been sacred to Pagans for
centuries. The number 5 is prevalent in the stories of the New Testament,
with Christ receiving five main wounds to his body at Calvary and feeding
the five thousand masses with five loaves of bread. Five represents
humanity, and to both ancient Pagans and modern Wiccans, it represents air,
fire, water, earth, and spirit— the stuff of which life is made.
The ancient Chinese believed that there were five basic elements that formed
the elemental basis for all things: wood, fire, earth, metal, and water. We
have five senses, and five digits on each hand and each foot. The pentagram
symbol was widely used in magickal practices, and is still considered a
sacred occult symbol to those who believe it embodies mankind within its
points. But inversely, the pentagram also has a more sinister representation
due to its often false association to the satanic religion. The identification
with the Pagan god Pan, or the mysterious horned Baphomet, surely did not
add to the inverse pentagram’s appeal to Christians, who proceeded to label
the innocuous image as evil. Pan was a harmless woodland god promoting
procreation and good times.
The Bolzani pentacle (left) is a depiction of Christ the man as a
macrocosmic whole. The inverse pentagram of Eliphas Levi represents the
Goat God Baphomet of occult tradition.
Images courtesy of Wikipedia.
Baphomet? The creation of occultist Eliphas Levi in his Dogma and Rituals
of High Magic, in which he included an image he had drawn himself that he
described as Baphomet and “The Sabbatic Goat,” a winged humanoid goat
with breasts and a torch on its head between its horns. Strangely, though, in
Levi’s original drawings, the pentagram was not inverted. Yet Baphomet
worship was linked to the Templars and even the Freemasons, which may
have lent more ammunition to devout Christians looking to undermine secret
societies with metaphysical teachings.
Regardless of one’s personal beliefs or convictions, the power of numbers
and symbols have shaped our beliefs to the point where everyone on earth
recognizes the positive elements of a star, and the negative elements of that
star turned on its tip.
Today we see the symbolic use of numbers to represent “something else” at
work, albeit in a more streetwise manner. Take modern public safety
professionals, for example. Police officers, firefighters, and EMS personnel
all use number codes to convey information about certain crimes, behaviors,
status, even their own physical locations. Interestingly, street gangs have
developed a number-related code of their own, as a means of communicat-
ing, as their law enforcement counterparts do, without really saying what
they mean to say. It’s a form of shorthand for the select few to understand,
just as, perhaps, the numeric codes evident in legends, myths, and tales of
old.
Numbers are such an integral part of our society, and have come to represent
and symbolize so much. Ever since man first learned to measure and specify
quantity, we have been on a progressively increasing path. It is only natural
that numbers have taken on symbolic significance in image form— the form
we humans best relate to and understand. Perhaps Sergeant Joe Friday’s
famous catch-phrase “Just the facts, ma’am” should have been “Just the
numbers, ma’am.”
Chapter 5:5 MYSTERY NUMBERS
The creator of the Universe works in mysterious ways. But he uses a base 10
counting system and likes round numbers.
—Scott Adams (American Cartoonist)
On a regular day, the average human experiences hundreds, if not thousands,
of events— some big and bold, others trivial and forget-table, but all
involving numbers. As we have made clear in previous chapters, for many, a
particular number or numbers will show up time and time again. Often, this
seeming coincidence infuses a deeper meaning, or a greater mystery into our
normally mundane existence. Mystery numbers suit up and show up a little
more often than their neighbors. They get noticed. They stand out.
Similar to the lead characters in the popular book and movie The Da Vinci
Code , we notice them, popping up in the least, and sometimes the most,
likely of places, and akin to Robert Langdon, we shake our heads in
confusion at their persistence. We cannot escape them.
Perhaps we should call them the “Pythagoras Code.”
To some, this simple number that follows 12 strikes horror into the heart and
fear into the darkest corners of the soul. Unlucky number 13 means black
cats and broken mirrors, shadows not to be crossed over, ladders not to be
walked under, and cracks not to be stepped upon (lest you wanna break your
momma’s back). How on earth did 13 get such a bad rap anyway? The
number is so bad it has even garnered itself its own phobia—
triskaidekaphobia. According to Wikipedia, “Triskaidekaphobia (from Greek
tris=three, kai=and, deka=ten) is an irrational fear of the number 13; it is a
superstition and related to a specific fear of Friday the 13th, called
paraskevi-dekatriaphobia or friggatriskaidekaphobia.”
Some hotels and buildings won’t even label the floors between 12 and 14.
Others refuse to leave their homes on the 13th of each month, most notably
on any Friday the 13th, when unspeakable horrors might occur. On some
passenger aircraft, such as those of Continental Airlines, Air New Zealand,
Alitalia, and Meridiana, you never have to worry about being assigned that
unlucky seat number because it is not available.
When it comes to explaining why we hate the number 13, there are many
theories and beliefs. One, posited by landscape designer and architect
Charles A. Platt in 1925, suggests that 13 is the first number that a person is
unable to count to using their eight fingers, two thumbs, and two feet. This
rather farfetched explanation is matched by suggestions that 13 is unlucky
because it is the number of full moons in a year, or because it is a number
unable to be paired or mated, or even because Judas Iscariot was the 13th
person to sit down to dinner before he betrayed Jesus Christ.
Other explanations refer to the number before it, 12, as the number of
wholeness or completeness, as indicated in the 12 Apostles of Christ, the 12
signs of the zodiac, and the 12 months in a year. The number 12 also adds up
in single digits to 3, the trinity number, which, as we saw in the previous
chapter, holds great influence and power in religious traditions and
metaphysics alike. There were 12 knights in King Arthurs Round Table, 12
days of Yule, 12 disciples each to Buddha and Mithra, 12 descendants of
Allah and 12 tribes of Israel, 12 paladins of Charlemagne, and 12 fruits of
the spirit. There are 12 inches in a foot and 12 fruits on the Cosmic Tree.
No wonder poor 13 is the odd-man-out, the leftover, and the rebel.
In a National Geographic article titled “Friday the 13th Phobia Rooted in
Ancient History,” John Roach and Donald Dossey, founder of the Stress
Management Center and Phobia Institute in Asheville, North Carolina, and a
folklore historian who authored Holiday Folklore, Phobias and Fun , said
fear of Friday the 13th is rooted in ancient, separate bad-luck associations
with the number 13 and the day Friday. The two unlucky entities ultimately
combined to make one super bad unlucky day. Dossey traces the fear of 13
to a Norse myth about 12 gods having a dinner party in Valhalla, their
heaven. In walked the uninvited 13th guest, the mischievous Loki. Once
there, Loki arranged for Hoder, the blind god of darkness, to shoot Balder
the Beautiful, the god of joy and gladness, with a mistletoe-tipped arrow.
“Balder died and the whole Earth got dark. The whole Earth mourned. It was
a bad, unlucky day,” said Dossey. From that moment on, Dossey states, the
number 13 has been considered ominous and foreboding.
We authors prefer a simpler explanation for the horror behind the number
13: it is the number that indicates the age when a child becomes a teenager.
Despite its bad rap, especially on Fridays in countries such as Sweden,
Belgium, and Germany (Tuesdays in Greece and Spain), there are just as
many indicators of the uniquely positive qualities of the number 13. It is the
number of the 13 Attributes of Mercy in the Torah. Thirteen is the number of
the original colonies that the United States was founded upon. It is the
number of loaves in a bakers dozen (or donuts, if you prefer). It is also a
prime number and a Fibonacci number, thus proving that what is bad to
some is good to others, and that even with numbers, it is all a matter of
perspective and belief.
In the Kabbalah, the number 13 is the value of unity, Achad, which is
Hebrew for “one.” According to Rabbi Michael Berg’s book The Way: Using
the Wisdom of Kabbalah for Spiritual Transformation and Fulfillment, “The
number 13 holds great significance according to Kabbalah. The Hebrew
words for ‘love’ (ahava), ‘care’ (de’aga), and ‘one’ (echad) all have the
numerical value of 13. In addition, kabbalistically, the number 13 indicates
the ability to rise above the influence of the 12 signs of the Zodiac (12 + 1 =
13), not being bound by the influences of the cosmos.”
More down to earth is the influence of this number on something we all
worship and adore: money.
The U.S. $1 bill has the following on the back:
• 13 steps on the pyramid.
• The motto above the pyramid has 13 letters (annuit coeptis).
E pluribus unum , written on the ribbon in the eagle’s beak, has 13 letters.
• 13 stars appear over the eagle’s head.
• 13 stripes are on the shield.
• 13 war arrows are in the eagle’s right talon.
• The olive branch in the eagle’s left talon has 13 leaves.
So, if the fear of the number 13 is a part of your belief system, we ask that
you send all dollar bills to us via our website post office box address.
In their book, The United Symbolism of America: Deciphering Hidden
Meanings in America’s Most Familiar Art, Architecture, and Logos , authors
Robert Hieronimus, PhD, and Laura Cortner come to the defense of number
13. They state that the misunderstanding of this innocent number is a recent
phenomenon, appearing to be a “strange leftover from the superstitions of
the Dark Ages.” According to them, it began when the Church started its
persecution of women and Pagan healers. “The number 13 is associated with
the followers of the Goddess and the way this culture marked time, based on
the annual menstruation cycle of the average woman.” The authors contend
that the word spread that the number 13 was evil, and the Pagan healers
suffered by being burned at the stake as witches.
Yet, as the authors point out, these same “holy persecutors” failed to
recognize the importance of the number 13 in their own Bible, a number
mentioned even as far back as the book of Genesis.
Before this negative connotation was attached, the number 13 was,
according to Hieronimus and Cortner, “seen as a number of transformation,
symbolizing renewal, rebirth, and regeneration. This interpretation may have
resulted from the fact that 13 follows that nice, round, complete number of a
dozen.” They also point to the repeated use of the number by our nation’s
Founding Fathers, who must have understood its importance in the repeated
symbolism of the Great Seal and the American Flag of our original colonies.
Superstition is one of the prime culprits to blame for negative values
attributed to any number. The same goes for good values. Did you know that
the number 7 is considered in many cultures to be the luckiest number of all?
In the Old and New Testament of the Bible, the number 7 shows up dozens
of times: seven days warning for Noah before the flood; seven locks of hair
on Samson’s head; seven daughters of Jethro in Exodus; seven priests with
seven trumpets on the seventh day in Joshua 6:4; seven devils possessing
Mary Magdalene; seven sons of the priest Sceva in Acts 19:14.
In the book of Revelations, the vision of St. John the Divine, the number 7
appears repeatedly: seven churches; seven spirits; seven golden candlesticks;
seven stars, angels, lamps, seals, horns, eyes, trumpets, thunders, crowns,
plagues, vials, mountains, and kings.
The number 7 obviously held a reverent position in the Judeo-Christian
traditions. Other numbers do appear frequently in the Bible as well, but
certainly not with the repetitive nature of 7. In occult symbology, the number
7 is considered deeply sacred, oft considered the number of the spirit of
“all,” or “the everything.”
In the Jewish religion, the number 7 plays a significant role.
According to Rabbi Yaakov Salomon, writing for Aish.com : The fact that
the Torah begins with a verse containing 7 words and 28 letters (divisible by
7) is hardly remarkable.
But when placed within the context of the overwhelming number of
associations in Judaism with 7, a fascinating tap-estry begins to unfurl.
Kabbalah teaches that 7 represents wholeness and completion. After seven
days, the world was complete. There are 6 directions in our world: north,
south, east, west, up, and down. Add to that the place where you are, and
you have a total of seven points of reference.
A few examples of the number 7 in the Jewish religion:
• Shabbat is the seventh day of the week.
• In Israel, there are seven days of Passover and Sukkot.
• When a close relative dies, we sit Shiva for seven days.
• Moses was born and died on the same day— the seventh of Adar.
• The Menorah in the Temple had seven branches.
• There are seven holidays in the Jewish year: Rosh Hashana, Yom Kippur,
Sukkot, Chanukah, Purim, Passover, and Shavuot.
• At every Jewish wedding, seven blessings are recited (Sheva Brachot).
• Moses was the seventh generation after Abraham.
• Each plague in Egypt lasted seven days.
• God created seven levels of heaven. (Hence the expression, “I’m in seventh
heaven!”)
• The Jewish calendar, largely lunar, has a cycle of intercala-tion that
contains seven leap years during each nineteen-year period.
• The Talmud lists seven female prophets: Sarah, Miriam, Deb-orah,
Hannah, Avigail, Chuldah, and Esther.
Pythagoreans called 7 the perfect number, 3 and 4, the triangle and the
square, the perfect figures. Philo of Alexandria, a contemporary of Christ,
said, “Nature delights in the number 7,” recognizing its significance in the
number of notes in music, stars in the Great Bear, and stages of the life of a
man. Seven is the number of external holes in the human head: two eyes,
two nostrils, one mouth, and two ears. Seven is the smallest positive integer
whose name in English is more than one syllable long. The United States
Constitution, as drafted in Philadelphia in 1787, was composed of seven
Articles. The United States declared independence in the seventh month of
1776.
There were traditionally seven wonders of the ancient world, though only the
Great Pyramid of Egypt still stands today. There were seven seas, and there
are seven chakras, seven basic principles of bushido, and seven points on a
sheriffs star (the heptagram, or seven-pointed star is a traditional symbol for
warding off evil). Roll a 7 in Vegas and you are bound to go home with
some cash in your pocket.
Christianity
The seven sacraments in the Christian faith (though some traditions assign
a different number).
The seven churches of Asia to which the book of Revelation is addressed.
The seven joys of the Virgin Mary, of Roman Catholic, Anglican, and other
traditions.
The seven sorrows of the Virgin Mary, of Roman Catholic, Anglican, and
other traditions.
The seven corporal acts of mercy of Roman Catholic, Anglican, and other
traditions.
The seven last words (or seven last sayings) of Jesus on the cross.
The seven virtues: chastity, temperance, charity, diligence, kindness,
patience, and humility.
The seven deadly sins: lust, gluttony, greed, sloth, wrath, envy, and pride.
The seven terraces of Mount Purgatory (one per deadly sin). Even one type
of ladybug, considered a lucky friend to all gardeners, has seven spots.
Even the Freemasons worshipped the number 7, so to speak. On a Scottish
Mason’s apron, there are seven tassels on each side. King Solomon took
seven years to build his temple, which was dedicated to the glory of God in
the seventh month in a festival that lasted seven days. There are seven liberal
arts and sciences, which is a traditional Masonic concept. Masons require
seven Brethren to make a Lodge perfect, and must have seven steps on the
winding staircase. Even Albert G. Mackey’s Encyclopaedia of
Freemasonry devotes two full pages to the number 7.
In the genealogy in the Gospel of Luke, Jesus is 77th in a direct line.
The number of heads of the three beasts (7 × 10 × 7 + 7 × 10
× 10 + 7 × 10 = 1260) of the Book of Revelation, and of some other
monsters, such as the hydra and the number of seals.
In the New Testament, the Gospel of Matthew 18:21, Jesus says to Peter to
forgive 70 times seven times.
There are seven suicides mentioned in the Bible.
Islam
The ayat in surat al-Fatiha.
The seven heavens in Islamic tradition.
The seven Earths in Islamic tradition.
The seven circumambulations (Tawaf ) that are made around the Kaaba.
The seven walks (Al-Safa and Al-Marwah); that is, traveling back and
forth seven times during the ritual pilgrimages of Hajj and Umrah.
The seven fires in hell; that is, the seven fires of hell.
The seven doors to heaven, and hell is also seven.
But why? Why is 7 so special that it elicits such significance?
One of the only possible explanations we could find relates to the original
belief by ancients that there were seven planets. Early cultures considered
the celestial bodies to be deities, and to these seven celestial bodies were
given tremendous power and influence over the lives of humans on earth.
Once additional planets were discovered, most cultures had already
embedded the number 7 into their belief systems, and continued the legacy
of lucky number 7, “Seven Sleepers.”
Hinduism
The Sanskrit word sapta refers to the number seven.
The Indian music has sapta swaras, meaning seven octats (sa re ga ma pa
dha ni), which are basics of music and are used in hundreds of Ragas.
Celestial group of seven stars are named as Sapta Rishi based on the seven
great saints.
Seven Promises and Seven Rounds in Hindu weddings and Seven
Reincarnations.
As per Hindu mythology, there are seven worlds in the universe, seven seas
in the world, and seven Rishies (seven gurus) called sapta rishis.
Mythology
In Khasi mythology, there are seven divine women who were left behind
on earth and became the ancestresses of all humankind.
The number of gateways traversed by Inanna during her descent into the
underworld.
The number of sleeping men in the Christian myth of the
The seven sages in Sumerian mythology and various other mythologies.
The number of sages in Hindu mythology; their wives are the goddesses
referred to as the “Seven Mothers.”
The number of main islands of mythological Atlantis.
infusing it into every area of life, including religion, myth, ritual, and
celebration. Hieronimus and Cortner, in The United Symbolism of America,
speculate that the number 7 got its good rap because it is a fundamental
geometrical shape, one achieved by drawing a triangle around a square
“which was done to symbolize the sky over the earth, or by inscribing a
triangle within a square, which was done to symbolize spirit within matter,
the soul within man.” They continue that 7 stands for “the complete period
or cycle of time, such as seven days in a week, as well as the many other
attributes previously mentioned.”
In Guaraní mythology, the number of prominent legendary monsters.
Japanese mythology talks of Shichifukujin (The Seven Gods of Fortune).
Others
The minor symbol number of yang from the Taoist yin and yang.
The number of palms in an Egyptian Sacred Cubit.
The number of ranks in Mithraism.
The number seven is of particular significance within Cherokee cosmology.
In Buddhism, Buddha walked seven steps at his birth.
In Irish mythology, the epic hero Cúchulainn is associated with the number
7. He has seven fingers on each hand, seven toes on each foot, and seven
pupils in each eye. In the Irish epic Táin Bó Cúailnge, Cúchulainn is 7 years
old when he receives his first weapons and defeats the armies of the Ulaidh.
His son Connla is 7 years old when he is slain by Cúchulainn in “The Death
of Aife’s Only Son.”
In British folklore, every seven years the Fairy Queen pays a tithe to Hell
(or possibly Hel) in the tale of Tam Lin.
In the British folk tale of Thomas the Rhymer, he went to live in the faerie
kingdom for seven years.
Other numbers also hold unusual sway with humans, often appearing with
frustrating frequency. One such example is the enigmatic number 23. It was
the subject of a poorly received movie starring Jim Carrey, as a man plagued
by the number. The “23
enigma” is the belief that all events revolve around the number 23, and that
this number is implicated in every incident in a person’s life in some form or
another. But at least this time, we can trace the enigma to its source, namely
several works of fiction via Robert Anton Wilson’s Illuminatus! Trilogy and
to William S. Burroughs (who first recounted his own involvement with the
number in a story about a mysterious Captain Clark, whose ship and crew
met with a terrible fate after 23 years, and the piloted flight #23 that was sent
to find them). The number also plays a role in Discordian philosophy.
Discordianism states that all events can be traced to the number 23 based
upon the “ingenuity” of the interpreter. In other words, if you are clever
enough, you can find a way to attach the number 23 to any significant event
in your life. Imagine that—finally a number that we can all relate to! Does
Kevin Bacon know about this?
The number 23 is certainly not alone. Take its closest relative for instance.
The number 24.
666
We would be remiss in our duties if we did not explore one of the all-time
most enigmatic numbers: 666. These three digits have long been the subject
of great debate among religious scholars and amateurs alike. Again, we turn
to the book of Revelation. In his vision on the Isle of Patmos, Saint John
refers to a beast that bears the mysterious number 666. This is the alleged
number of the Antichrist that will wreak havoc upon the earth until the
return of Jesus himself and the day of final judgment. (cited from the book of
the Revelation 13:17).
The 24 Enigma?
There are 24 hours in a day.
There are 24 ribs in the human body.
24 is the smallest number to have eight different factors. (1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8,
12).
24 is the number of letters in both the modern and classical Greek alphabet.
The 24th and last letter of the Greek alphabet is “Omega”, meaning “the
end.”
There are 24 “perfect” numbers. These are numbers that equal the sum of
all its divisors except itself. (For instance, 6— the lowest of these numbers—
is divisible by 1, 2, or 3, and 1 + 2 + 3 = 6.) The largest of the known
“perfect” numbers has 12,003 digits.
24 is the largest number divisible by all numbers less than its square root.
24 is the number of cycles in the Chinese solar year.
24 is the number of books in the Tanakh.
24 is the total number of major and minor keys in Western tonal music, not
counting enharmonic equivalents.
The binary representation of 24 is 11,000.
24 is the sum of twin prime numbers (11 + 13).
The earth travels 24,000 miles in 24 hours.
But why three 6s? If number 7 is considered the number of perfection, then
the number 6 symbolizes that which falls short of perfection. One only has to
recall the story of the fall of the angel Lucifer, because of his vanity and
imperfection, to realize that the number 6, tripled, is empowered with
negativity.
Beastly Number!
666 is an abundant number. It is the sum of the first 36 natural numbers
(that is, 1 + 2 + 3 . . . + 34 + 35 + 36 = 666), and thus a triangular number.
Because 36 is both square and triangular, 666 is the sixth number of the
form n2(n2 + 1) / 2 (triangular squares) and the eighth number of the form
n(n + 1)(n2 + n + 2) / 8 (doubly triangular numbers).
666 is the sum of the squares of the first seven prime numbers. The harmonic
mean of the decimal digits of 666 is an integer: 3/(1/6
+ 1/6 + 1/6) = 6, making 666 the 54th number with this property.
In base 10, 666 is a palindromic number, a repdigit, and a Smith number.
In the Eastern Orthodox Church, 666 is considered to be symbolic. Because
666 in Greek numerals stands for the Christ for man, because the man was
created on the sixth day of Genesis, and the serpent represented what came
between them.
The UPC barcodes found on most commercial products are characterized by
guard bars at the beginning, middle, and end made According to Wikipedia:
• In the Bible, 666 is the number of Adonikam’s descendants who return to
Jerusalem and Judah from the Babylonian exile.
• In the Bible, 666 is the number of gold talents that King Solomon collected
in a single year.
up of two thin lines. Two thin lines also appear in the UPC encoding for the
digit 6 (and no other digit), so to human eyes (but not to an electronic
barcode reader) the guard bars appear to read 666. Some people interpret
this as a fulfillment of the prophecy
“Without this number an individual will not be able to buy or sell”
The 2006 remake of the horror film The Omen was released on June 6, 2006
(06/06/06) at 06:06:06 in the morning.
The full name of former U.S. president Ronald Wilson Reagan contains six
letters in each of his three names. This caused numerologists such as Gary
D. Blevins to believe that Reagan was in fact the antichrist. Additionally,
when Reagan moved to California following the end of his presidency, he
asked that his house number be changed from 666 to 668.
In Chinese culture, 666 sounds a lot like the words meaning that things are
going smoothly. It is considered one of the luckiest numbers in Chinese
culture. It can be seen prominently in many shop windows across the
country, and people there often pay extra to get a mobile phone number
including this string of digits.
• The number 666 is a frequent visual element of Aryan Broth-erhood
tattoos.
• The sum of all the numbers on a roulette wheel is 666.
For some, the number 6 represents nothing more than man himself, with two
arms, two legs, a torso, and a head. Six is also the trinity doubled.
Number anomalies abound. And you thought math was boring!
The number 37 will multiply into 111, 222, 333, 444, 555, 666, 777, 888, and
999.
3 x 37 = 111
6 x 37 = 222
9 x 37 = 333
12 x 37 = 444
15 x 37 = 555
18 x 37 = 666
21 x 37 = 777
24 x 37 = 888
27 x 37 = 999
If we are to label 666 as an “evil” number, then we must also ask the
question: Was the original intention to be focused on the three digits
themselves? Was it their sum of 18? Or, as in numerology, the sum of their
sum— 9?
Numeric anomalies exist everywhere, speaking of a higher intelligence adept
at mathematical processing, one that often eludes us until we, well, crunch
the numbers.
Because our lives are so intrinsically linked to numbers, we cannot avoid
these synchronistic associations. And because we are humans, we then attach
even further meaning to the synchronicity itself.
In the next chapter, we will learn about an actual “science,” or maybe we
should call it an “art” that uses numbers to predict the future and determine
the fate of individual and collective destinies alike.
Is nothing random?
Chapter 6:6 NAME, RANK, AND SERIAL
NUMBER
When you have mastered numbers, you will in fact no longer be reading
numbers, anymore than you read words when reading books. You will be
reading meanings.
—W. E. B. DuBois
God is ever a geometer.
Greek Pythagorean motto
There are those who believe that numbers have the power to shape our lives,
our relationships, and our destinies. This belief is so prevalent that the study
of numerology was established. Numerology consists of systems, traditions,
or beliefs that posit a mystical or esoteric relationship between numbers and
physical objects.
Numerology and numerological divination were popular among early
mathematicians, such as Pythagoras, but are now regarded as pseudo
mathematics by most modern scientists.
According to accepted scientific tenets, it would not be entirely accurate to
call numerology a science. Rather, it can best be described as a belief system
founded on the concept that the “number behind a name” can literally dictate
a person’s fate and fortune.
Similar to astrology, numerology is based upon the idea that everything,
even the names we were given by our parents at birth, has a profound
meaning and purpose in the realization and unfoldment of our individual
paths. From the jobs we choose to the places we live to the mates we give
our hearts to, people throughout the centuries have studied their astrological
and numerological charts and signs in hopes of gleaning prescient
information that might enable them to make better informed life choices.
The study of numbers as a means of divination is believed by many
historians to have its initial roots in Pythagorean mathematics. Once again,
Pythagoras is a key player in the development of what we consider the
merging of numbers and letters as a means of describing and determining
character, motivation, and purpose.
Though the actual roots are probably far older, for numerology does appear
in the ancient Hebrew Kabbalah, it was the Pythagoreans who perfected the
“art” to the point where it gained widespread acceptance as a method of
divination, similar to astrology, which blends birth times and locations with
celestial influences.
Other influences on the evolution of numerology come from early Christian
mysticism, Gnosticism, and the Vedas, as well as from Chinese and Egyptian
ancient esoteric traditions. St. Augustine of Hippo is quoted to have written,
“Numbers are the Universal language offered by the deity to humans as
confirmation of the truth” and he shared Pythagoras’s conviction that
numbers were behind everything in life. Obviously, after the Council of
Nicea in 325 AD, the early Christian authority figures all but banned the
practice as a form of “magic” and divination, along with astrology and other
Pagan beliefs and traditions.
As the power of the Church rose to great heights during the Dark Ages, so
too did the more shadowy “occult” traditions that were practiced by millions
behind closed doors. This included the study of numerology, which further
evolved as an esoteric “science” in just about every culture, including the
Chinese, who created their own entire numerological system. Even the Tarot,
passed down through the Middle Ages, was often associated with
numerology.
By matching the 22 major arcana to birth name letters and birth dates, the
connection between numerology and tarot was under-standably linked.
Moving ahead to the 1920s, it was most notably the work of fortune-teller
Count Louis Hamon, writing as Cheiro, that truly popularized the art.
Cheiro, author of The Book of Numbers , is responsible for the development
of the “fadic” system of numbers. The fadic method added together all of the
digits of a person’s birth date to glean their final number of destiny. Books
by L. Dow Balliett published in the early 1900s, and those in the 1930s by
Florence Campbell, also served to revive this “pseudoscience” of number
divination.
As a time of newfound enlightenment and spiritual discovery, the New Age
movement of the late 1960s and early 1970s led to an increased awareness of
numerology, combined with growing curiosity of such anomalies as time
prompts, Y2K, 2012, the Bible Code, and other number-based mysteries.
This interest seems to have vaulted this occult tradition into the mainstream.
Talk to anyone nowadays, and chances are they know their “destiny number”
or “summation number,” the sum number of the letters of their birth name,
which, as numerologists tell us, offers an intricate glimpse into our past,
present, and future.
Though many of today’s numerologists have expanded the basics into a
whole range of potential readings, including birth name, life paths, destiny
numbers, Soul Purpose numbers, Love Matches, and more, the most familiar
way to use the numbers behind your personality is simply to take your full
name given at birth, and find the corresponding digits, then add those for the
total, or “summation number.” But even that technique has variations. Let’s
use our names as an example:
The first technique simply adds up the digits in your name for the
summation.
Marie Dauphine Savino— 19 = 1 + 9 = 10 = 1 + 0 = 1. Marie is a 1.
Laurence William Flaxman— 22 = 2 + 2 = 4. Larry is a 4.
The second technique gives a corresponding number to the letter according
to its placement in the alphabet: Marie Dauphine Savino
Laurence William Flaxman
M = 13
L = 12
A = 1
A = 1
R = 18
U = 21
I = 9
R = 18
E = 5
E = 5
D = 4
N = 14
A = 1
C = 3
U = 21
E = 5
P = 16
W = 23
H = 8
I = 9
I = 9
L = 12
N = 14
L = 12
E = 5
I = 9
S = 19
A = 1
A = 1
M = 13
V = 22
F = 6
I = 9
L = 12
N = 14
A = 1
O = 15
X = 24
M = 13
A = 1
N = 14
Total:
Total:
204 = 2 + 4 = 6
229 = 2 + 2 + 9 = 13 = 1 + 3 = 4
Do It Yourself Numerology
Find the numbers that match your birth name letters and add them up to see
what digit dominates your destiny.
A 1
H 8
O 15
V 22
B 2
I 9
P 16
W 23
C 3
J 10
Q 17
X 24
D 4
K 11
R 18
Y 25
E 5
L 12
S 19
Z 26
F 6
M 13
T 20
G 7
N 14
U 21
Thus, there would be a different final summation number for Marie, which
means a different life path, purpose, and destiny depending on who would be
doing her reading. Yet Larry’s came out the same. Does that mean Marie has
a split personality she knows nothing about?
Other techniques claim to utilize your common name, as in Marie D. Jones
and Larry Flaxman. Others yet incorporate a host of other determining
factors. For example, your full name at the time of reading, your
confirmation name, nickname, or the name your spouse calls you when he or
she is angry with you. Many modern numerologists also incorporate birth
time and/or date into their readings.
Scientists see this wide range of potentials as part of the problem with taking
numerology seriously. If there is no solid agreement as to which name, date,
or birth time to use, how could anyone possibly be certain of the singular
outcome of a reading as proof of destiny? It certainly does not lend credence
to the art, or pseudoscience, of numerology, but, nonetheless, people swear
by its outcomes, no matter how one gets to those outcomes.
BIRTH NAMES
The most widely used, oldest, and perhaps the most seriously studied forms
of numerology use the birth name, for that is the name you were given at the
moment of your entry into this life. As with astrology, which posits that the
positioning of stars and planets influences our fate, numerology also posits
that there is incredible influence on a person from the chosen name they are
given. Perhaps the parents are infused with a subconscious inspiration that
matches letter and number, and comes out simply as the urge to name one’s
child Jane, Elizabeth, Michael, or Gertrude. It might truly be an interesting
exercise to examine some of the more unusual names, which are currently en
vogue, and to see the patterns that emerge through time in chosen careers,
love matches, and overall personality traits.
Once the Destiny Number, or Master Number as it is often referred to, is
determined, there are variations on what personality traits— both positive
and negative, one most associates with those numbers.
But all of this is according to the interpretation of those divining the
numbers. In a sense, it is also open to the interpretation of the person
receiving the reading itself. If you want to believe you are a powerful leader,
having your number state you are “bold and ob-noxious” could easily be
interpreted as such. Ask anyone and they might claim those same positive
and negative essences as a 1 or a 4, yet actually be a number 3, 5, or 8.
Ideally, a true numerological reading will get into much greater detail than
what can be found on the many “do it yourself” websites or the introductory
books that are in abundance in the New Age section of your local book store.
CHARACTER DESTINY
Similar to astrology, some readings result in a one-page summary of
character and destiny, while there are others that result in a one hundred-
page, highly detailed diatribe that literally maps a person’s past, present, and
future with stunning and inimitable accuracy.
One has to wonder, though, if this is more a statement about the person
doing the reading than the actual method of divination or interpretation.
Similar to our zodiac signs (with their helpful and harmful influences), or
our Chinese Year signs (with their positive and negative traits), we seek to
match who we are with when we came into the world, and what we were
called when we got here. As a Libra and a Capricorn (Ox and Dog according
to Chinese astrology), we have specific traits associated with our birth signs.
Libras cannot make up their minds; Capricorns, thankfully, can. Libras are
dreamy. Capricorns are more down to earth. Libras are outgoing.
Capricorns are stable. The Ox is bold. The Dog is determined. The Ox is
stubborn. The Dog is loyal. The Ox moves first, thinks later.
The Dog thinks first, moves later. The Dog hikes his leg unsuspect-ingly . . .
okay, just kidding. We wanted to make sure you were still paying attention.
Many of these traits allow us to form beneficial relationships with others
who have “compatible” numbers, signs, or symbols. Ox and Dog, although
both highly competitive, make a powerhouse team. Yet again, many of the
associated birth-sign traits could not be further from the truth about who we
might really be. Perhaps it’s a combination of nature and nurture when all is
said and done.
FACT OR FICTION?
All over the world you will find many people living, loving, and working
together who breach the code of “who goes together better,” suggesting that
perhaps these divination systems were meant to be more guideposts than
full-on navigational systems one must follow to the last detail. The insightful
website Skepdic.com points out on their numerology page, “When you get
your reading, you may find yourself ignoring the parts that don’t fit you at
all, and focusing on those parts that do seem to fit. They may actually fit you
or they may fit your image of how you would like to be.” This is a critical
aspect of any divinatory art: telling the client what they want to hear, even if
the reader is motivated by sincerity of purpose. Throughout the ages, seers,
prophets, psychics, and clairvoyants alike have similarly utilized this
psychological trait to great effect— providing convincing readings and
interpretations to those so eager for answers.
So, can numerology be simply attributed to a psychological “pat on the
back”? Should we simply construe it as a recreational diversion— holding
little to no validity? In our beliefs, no. Even Robert Todd Carol admits on his
site skepdic.com , “Nevertheless, numerology shouldn’t be brushed off
without a thorough examination of its underlying theory.” Granted, he goes
on to say there does not seem to be any underlying theory to the skeptics, but
those who know the true magic of numbers beg us all to look deeper.
There are several issues that scientists take against numerology, as well as
every other divination method. The primary issue is the lack of cohesiveness
to the system. Second, there are concerns regarding repeatability, empirical
evidence, and often, sheer accuracy.
There are so many different methods of calculating the matching numbers to
letters: The English, Hebrew, Chaldean, Phonetic,
Chinese, Indian, and Pythagorean are a few that come to mind. If one uses
the Chaldean method, the letter W equals 6. In the English system, it equals
5, the total of 2 + 3 (23rd letter). These are significant differences that could
result in totally inaccurate readings. The disparity is such that someone could
go home thinking that they are destined for show biz, when perhaps the truth
is quite the opposite, and their real life path is in the mortuary business.
Although some might argue that there is little distinction between the two
disciplines.
GEMATRIA
All humor aside, the art of numerology does have a foundation in esoteric
knowledge; though, it goes back a long, long way.
One of the oldest references to the origin of numerology comes to us from
the Hebrew Kabbalah. Known as “gematria,” this Jewish mystical tradition
associates numbers with letters from the Hebrew alphabet, then seeks hidden
meaning in words that combine these letter/number forms. In gematria,
entire words are converted into meaningful numeric associations; just as in
numerology, a name is converted into a destiny or summation number by
which divination occurs. But in gematria, similar words, with similar
numeric values and contextual meanings are used to comment upon the
original word, adding a richer depth to the system.
Ancient Greeks are said to have used the system of gematria to help interpret
dreams, associating a numeric value to the letters of the Greek alphabet.
Gnostics used the system to find hidden meaning behind the names of deities
such as Mithra. Early Christians, most likely influenced by the Hebrew
Bible, associated the numeric value of the Greek letters for alpha and omega,
beginning and end, with the Greek word peristera , or dove (a symbol of
Christ). That value is the number 801.
But it was the Kabbalists who developed gematria into a serious form of
mystical knowledge, tradition, and divination, often utilized to seek the holy
name of God, and to understand his ways and means via the numbers behind
the words of their holiest of texts.
The word “gematria” comes from both Hebrew and Greek roots, with a link
to the Greek word for geometry, and can be split into two traditions:
“revealed” gematria, used in many forms of Rabbinic Judaism; and
“mystical” gematria, more prevalent with those practic-ing Kabbalah.
Gematria shares similarities with other numerological systems, namely the
Greek version of isopsephy, numerology associated with the Latin language,
and the Arabic Hisab al-Jummal.
Some experts suggest gematria was first practiced by the Babylonian king
Sargon II. In the eighth century BC, Sargon II may have even used the
divination method to help construct the wall of Khorsabad, which was
16,283 cubits in length, the exact numerical value of his own name.
The most common gematria tradition is the revealed form, with roots in both
the Talmud and Midrash, and has been written about by many commentators
from later periods of time. This form focuses entirely on the power of
assigning a numerical value to each letter of the Hebrew alphabet, with the
end result being a word or combination of words that hold profound
meaning, which were often said to be of a prophetic or divine nature.
The most widely studied tradition may be the mystical tradition that focuses
on the 10 sefirot, or “fires of God,” of the Kabbalistic tree of life, and the 22
letters of the alphabet. The mystical tradition, which further evolved more
extensively in the writings of Zohar, also seeks to associate the letters of the
alphabet with the 22 solids formed by regular polygons (five are Platonic
solids, four Kepler-Poisot, and 13 are Archimedean). One solid was
associated with one letter.
The Kabbalah Tree of Life corresponds the ten sefirot with letters of the
Hebrew alphabet. Image courtesy of Wikipedia.
Thirteenth-century Kabbalists believed that there was a hidden code in the
Old Testament, and that gematria could unlock the key that could read the
code. This code was used to interpret whole verses by assigning numerical
values to specific words. This practice was fine-tuned by the German scholar
Eleazar of Worms, a commentarian writing during the same century.
Because much of gematria is based upon the interrelation of words and
phrases, it naturally leaves much room for interpretation . . . or
misinterpretation, as the case may be. Add to that the presence of diverse
systems within the system, and different ways to calculate the equivalent
value of an individual letter, and, similar to modern numerology, it appears
that the outcome or end result can vary according to the person doing the
“math.”
According to the teachings of Harav Yitzchak Ginsburgh, a renowned
authority on Kabbalah and Chassidut, who has been making the profound
wisdom of the Jewish esoteric tradition accessible to seekers of Jewish
spirituality for more than twenty-five years, the four calculation methods for
assigning equivalent value are:
1. Absolute value— each letter has the value of its accepted numerical
equivalent.
2. Ordinal value— each letter has the equivalent from 1 through 22.
3. Reduced value— each letter is reduced to a one-digit figure.
4. Integral reduced value— the total numerical value of a word is reduced
to a single digit.
One thing to keep in mind is that this is just associated with one particular
system of gematria. There are several, with other systems and sub-systems
emphasizing varying decoding methods, such as the notarikon , which posits
that the first letter of words can be combined to form new words; the
opposite system, which takes the last letter of words to make new words or
phrases; and the temurah , a complex system that organizes letters into tables
that are then assigned specific mathematical values.
Even the early Christians felt the influence of the older Hebrew gematria.
Theomatics, yet another numerology system, is based upon the Greek and
Hebrew influences of the New Testament.
The term, coined in the 1970s by Del Washburn, coauthor (with Jerry Lucas)
of Theomatics: God’s Best Kept Secret Revealed and Theomatics II : God’s
Best-Kept Secret Revealed , is meant to bring together the words
mathematics and God, and posits that God directly intervened in the writing
of the Christian biblical texts.
Basing itself on both Hebrew gematria and the Greek system of isopsephia,
once again, a numerical value is given to each letter of both the ancient
Hebrew and Greek alphabets, revealing distinct patterns that believers insist
are not simply random or chance.
Ardent followers of theomatics claim that God himself placed the
mathematical code into the biblical texts, and that each word of the Bible is
spelled and placed into context with such intricate precision so as to literally
document the entirety of past, present, and future. Names of people, names
of locations, dates of events, and times of birth— were all orchestrated by
this Divine Mathematician in an exact, predetermined location in the text to
correspond with a numerical value meant for it and it alone. A Holy
Magnum Opus.
RANDOM FACTS
W. Wynn Wescott, widely considered an extremely influential Satan ist in
the latter part of the 19th century, explains in his book, Numbers: Their
Occult Power and Mystic Virtues : The followers of Pythagoras . . . referred
every object, planet, man, idea, and essence to some number or other, in a
way which to most moderns must seem curious and mystical in the highest
degree. “The numerals of Pythagoras,” says Por-phyry, who lived about 300
AD, “were hieroglyphic symbols, by means whereof he explained all ideas
concerning the nature of things,” and the same [numeric] method of
explaining the secrets of nature is once again being insisted upon in the new
revelation of the Secret Doctrine by H.P. Blavatsky.
“Numbers are a key to the ancient views of cosmogony— in its broad sense,
spiritually as well as physically considered, to the evolution of the present
human race; all systems of religious mysticism are based upon numerals.
The sacredness of numbers begins with the Great First Cause, the One, and
ends only with the nought or zero— symbol of the infinite and boundless
universe.
Our innate desire for learning about, and gathering information related to our
personal and collective destinies, won’t go away anytime soon. Numbers
have become such an integral part of our daily life that it is expected that we
would attempt to look for meaning behind them as well. Sometimes that
meaning comes in the form of synchronicities.
Chapter 7:7 SYNCHRONICITY
If the odds are a million to one against something occurring, chances are
50-50 that it will.
—Anonymous
For those of us who grew up in the ’80s, it would be hard to disagree that the
bestselling Police album Synchronicity represents the feelings and emotions
of the era quite well. Perhaps not surprisingly, Sting was a big fan of Carl
Jung, the noted Swiss psychologist, and penned the song as a tribute to his
theory of synchronicity. In fact, Sting was so enamored with Jung that the
cover graphic of the album depicts him reading a copy of Jung’s work! As he
explained the theme of the song to Time magazine: “Jung believed there was
a large pattern to life, that it wasn’t just chaos. Our song ‘Synchronicity II’ is
about two parallel events that aren’t connected logically or causally, but
symbolically.”
The word synchronicity can be first attributed to Carl Jung, who used the
word to describe the “temporally coincident occurrences of acausal events.”
Jung also used the terms “acausal connecting principle,” “meaningful
coincidence,” and “acausal parallelism” to describe events that seemed to be
much more than sheer coincidence. The concept of synchronicity did not
escape such lumi-naries as Albert Einstein, who was fascinated by this
principle of connectivity of events that could not, it seemed, be explained
away by simple scientific means.
Jung stated that these synchronicities served to link the subjective world
with the objective world. Hidden mathematical relationships between events
speak of this link, as though beneath the structure of visible reality there
exists a complex and detailed infrastructure, or, as we might say, “inner-
structure.” This implicate level of reality, to take a phrase from physicist
David Bohm, may serve as a grid upon which all events occur, no matter
their place in space or time, with some destined to occur simultaneously on
several grid levels at a time.
Frank Joseph, former editor-in-chief of Ancient American magazine and
author of several books on Atlantis, wrote in a New Dawn Magazine article
titled “Synchronicity: The Key of Destiny” that numbers were one of many
categories of synchronicity that people experience throughout their lives. He
believed number synchronicities “thread together mystical human
experience, often with surprising results.”
Joseph, akin to many others, believes that when two events or objects share
an association with the same number, there is more than mere coincidence
behind the scenes. This is especially so when that number turns up
repeatedly, as does 11:11 and other time prompts and sequences discussed
throughout this book. If it happens once or twice, it might be a lucky
coincidence, but seven, nine, or twelve times? And in one day? Now that is
just too strange to be anything but on purpose.
Friedrich Schiller, the famed German poet and philosopher, is quoted as
saying, “There is no such thing as chance; and what seems to us merest
accident springs from the deepest source of destiny.”
Noted French author Anatole France believed that “chance is perhaps the
pseudonym of God when he does not wish to sign his work.” This belief that
synchronicities are signs or symbols originating from a higher power or
being may be what forces us humans to give meaning to events occurring in
unison. Meaning may not be necessarily implied in two number events
colliding; rather, we imply the meaning to it. When this occurs, we marvel
that, once again, we saw the number 876 nine times in one day, or had
several run-ins with the number 62 in the last hour. Meaning is the element
that we bring to a linked set of events the universe delivers to us.
Too Many 18s?
I was born on the 18th of May, 1962 (1 + 9 + 6 + 2 = 18). I was born at
9:54 a.m. (9 + 5 + 4 = 18). I was 18 inches long at birth.
I was born in Louisville, Kentucky (Louisville has 10 letters and Kentucky
has eight letters = 18 letters). I was officially adopted in the 18th month of
my life (November 13, 1963). The number 18 is a 9-number in astrology,
because 1 + 8 = 9. I turned 18 on May 18, 1980 (1 + 9 + 8 + 0 = 18). The
last four digits of my Social Security Number add up to 18. My zip code ends
with 18 (41018). At my job, I was originally hired as a shipper in the
shipping depart-ment, and my shipper number given to me was 18. In 2000
our company installed a time clock for the first time, and my timecard
barcode number adds up to 18. —Contributed by “Jim”
Upon closer reflection, our lives always seem to follow some kind of pattern,
or play out like a puzzle, with interlocking pieces.
During Carl Jung’s study and treatment of patients who had been diagnosed
with emotional and mental disorders, he determined that there was an
uncanny relationship between many patients’ dreams and events that
occurred in their waking life. One of the most famous and well-known cases
involves a woman he treated who was difficult to break through. Jung
listened intently as she described a strange dream involving a scarab beetle.
At that very moment, one flew into the room and landed right before their
eyes!
This is a rare insect, and not common to their geographic region.
This experience was all that particular patient needed to see in order to
liberate her from her mental blocks and begin the healing process.
It was almost as if some higher force knew she needed the validation.
Pareidolia and Apophenia
The human brain is hardwired to seek and find patterns wherever it can in
order to understand a complex situation or arrangement.
This is a primitive survival mechanism remaining from our prehistoric
ancestors, when it was important to discern a stampeding boar from a pet
goat in the dense underbrush. This phenomenon, known as “matrixing,” or
more commonly “pareidolia,” is a universal human response. The term
pareidolia , according to Wikipedia, describes a “psychological phenomenon
involving a vague and random stimulus (often an image or sound) being
perceived as significant. Common examples include images of animals or
faces in clouds, the man in the moon, and hidden messages on records
played in reverse.” Are you a tea drinker? If so, have you ever attempted to
“read” the leaves in the bottom of the cup?
The term apophenia means the ability of the human mind to seek and find
meaning and significance where there seemingly is none. Klaus Konrad
coined this term in 1958, and defined it as the “unmotivated seeing of
connections” accompanied by a “specific experience of an abnormal
meaningfulness.” The terms apophenia and pareidolia are often used to
explain unknown or paranormal events. More than likely you have
experienced this at some point in your life.
According to Dr. Martina Belz-Merk, “There is currently a controversial
debate concerning whether unusual experiences are symptoms of a mental
disorder, if mental disorders are a consequence of such experiences, or if
people with mental disorders are especially susceptible to or even looking
for these experiences.”
Skepdic.com has lengthy descriptions of both apophenia and pareidolia.
According to the site:
The propensity to see connections between seemingly un-related objects or
ideas most closely links psychosis to creativity . . . apophenia and creativity
may even be seen as two sides of the same coin. Some of the most creative
people in the world, then, must be psychoanalysts and therapists who use
projective tests like the Rorschach test or who see patterns of child abuse
behind every emotional problem. Brugger notes that one analyst thought he
had support for the penis envy theory because more females than males
failed to return their pencils after a test. Another spent nine pages in a
prestigious journal describing how sidewalk cracks are vaginas and feet are
penises, and the old saw about not stepping on cracks is actually a warning
to stay away from the female sex organ.
Bruggers research indicates that high levels of dopamine affect the
propensity to find meaning, patterns, and significance where there is none,
and that this propensity is related to a tendency to believe in the paranormal.
In statistics, apophenia is called a Type I error, seeing patterns where none,
in fact, exist. It is highly probable that the apparent significance of many
unusual experiences and phenomena are due to apophenia, e.g., ghosts and
hauntings, EVP, numerology, the Bible code, anomalous cognition, ganzfeld
“hits”, most forms of divination, the prophecies of Nostradamus, remote
viewing, and a host of other paranormal and supernatural experiences and
phenomena.
The experience of apophenia is universal, and is experienced by many
people throughout their lives. Skeptics argue that it seems highly likely that
in the course of any long human life, linked events are bound to happen, and
we, as humans, will find a way to label them as being relevant or important.
These same skeptics ask, how do we know the meaning we ascribe to them
is the correct one? Is it personal, or a collective meaning from, as Jung
believed, somewhere deep in the psyche ruled by archetype and symbol?
Just because the meaning isn’t obvious to the conscious mind, though,
doesn’t mean it isn’t there.
If most of our programming comes from the depths of the subconscious, it
makes more sense that meaning arises from those same depths, and not from
a place of analysis, judgment, and rational perspective.
If the 11:11 time prompts truly are a collective wake-up call, we have to
entertain the notion that synchronicities happen on both an individual and
collective level, with both individual and collective meanings. Because Jung
believed that we access subconscious archetypes during these moments, we
can postulate that there are number synchronicities that are meant to have
meaning for the all as well as the individual.
Two people experiencing the same number event, or one person
experiencing the same number or event throughout a specific time period,
suggests not just a link of minds, but of ideas and perceptions. There appears
to be an underlying pattern that is part of the entire framework, which again
harkens back to the concept of an intricate, hidden layer of reality beneath
that which we see, hear, touch, taste, and feel. During a lecture in 1951, Jung
detailed his version of this larger framework, which was then published as
Synchronicity— An Acausal Connecting Principle in a volume with related
research by Nobel Prize winner Wolfgang Pauli.
Stories of Synchronicity:
A Journal Entry of a Dream
I was teaching art in a big, beautiful school, and my art room number was
11. I was called out of the room by a janitor dressed all in white, and he
pointed to the hallway wall where the number 11 was printed next to the
room number. He looked at me very meaningfully, as if to say, what will you
do about it?
Immediately I began looking for the key to the room. The key was gold, but—
I thought in my dream— a little cheap-looking, so I could give it to the
substitute teacher. I had to go teach in a bigger school near Milwau-kee, so I
got in a small, round white vehicle that floated on an air cushion and was
steered with a mouse-like device and took off down the highway.
This dream occurred just after I had left a job teaching art in Lake Ge-neva
because of the very heavy schedule it entailed. After the dream, I began to
see 11:11 everywhere . . . digital clocks, license plates, road signs, you name
it, until it was driving me crazy. Finally I Googled it and to my surprise,
found that there was actually a Website dedicated to the phenomenon. Ever
since, the double-11s seem to come in clusters, and I always know something
profound, big, or crazy is about to happen. When I see clusters of higher
doubles, like 44-44, it seems to be more about spiritual things.
For me, it all ties into the idea of God’s universe as a synchronous whole,
and as an alert Intelligence that reaches out to communicate to those who
have “ears to hear.”
And as a postscript, I did end up getting another teaching job, at a smaller
school, but it was located right next to a highway sign that read 11:11, on
Hwy. 11, which I had to see every time I drove there.
—Linda S. Godfrey, author of Strange Wisconsin, The Beast of Bray Road ,
and Hunting the American Werewolf
TIME PROMPTS AND PHYSICS
Pauli, an Austrian-Swiss physicist, was intrigued by the links between
physics and psychology, especially within the realm of quantum physics. He
is noted for his work on spin theory, as well as for his discovery of the
exclusion principle that links the structures of matter and chemistry. He also
focused on the duality of the objective and subjective mind, with an
emphasis on the impersonal nature of the objective mind. It was this mind
that Jung suggested was the home of both the collective consciousness and
collective archetypes, as well as the origin point of synchronistic experience.
Jung’s fascination with symbol and archetype may have shaded his own
personal interpretations of synchronistic events, but using the “keep it
simple, stupid” (KISS) principle made famous by the tenet of Ockham’s
razor suggests that the simplest explanation is that these are, indeed, pure
coincidence. Rather than attach all kinds of complex explanations to an
experience, we look for the most simple, basic, fundamental cause— it just
happened that way.
Medieval English philosopher and Franciscan monk William of Ockham
(1285–1349) said, “Pluralitas non est ponenda sine necessitate.” Translated,
this means “Plurality should not be posited without necessity,” and was a
common principle in medieval philosophy. According to Skepdic.com ,
“Ockham’s razor is also called the principle of parsimony. These days it is
usually interpreted to mean something like ‘the simpler the explanation, the
better’ or ‘don’t multiply hypotheses unnecessarily.’ In any case, Ockham’s
razor is a principle that is frequently used outside of ontology, e.g., by
philosophers of science in an effort to establish criteria for choosing from
among theories with equal explanatory power. When giving explanatory
reasons for something, don’t posit more than is necessary.”
Confirmation Bias
Random chance might lead to more connected experiences without an
underlying meaning. What is referred to as “confirmation bias”
is the likely culprit behind our resolute need to find or interpret information
in a meaningful manner, all the while avoiding any evidence to the contrary.
We believe what we want to believe, and hear and see what we want to hear
and see, for personal reasons that often clash with what others believe, hear,
and see. This is one of the main reasons for conflicts between religions and
political parties (and in relationships, too!).
Pauli was critical of this confirmation bias theory, thus his support for Jung’s
work. Many scientists struggle with their need to explain away coincidences
as meaningless, all the while trying to reconcile the fact that the evidence
sometimes points to these occurrences as being too obvious to be anything
but meaningless.
Cosmic Giggles
Nature indeed consists of patterns, as we’ve discussed previously, and
perhaps more than anything, nature likes to pair things up.
Terence McKenna, the prominent writer, philosopher, and eth-nobotanist,
referred to these events as “cosmic giggles,” randomly moving “zones of
synchronicity and statistical anomaly.” McKenna’s suggestion is that there
may be a “science” to the synching of events, even if it appears utterly
random while happening. For a great cosmic giggle it has long been
suggested one listen to Pink Floyd’s Dark Side of the Moon while watching
The Wizard of Oz .
Indeed, having done this a long, long time ago (Marie says, being of that
particular era), the two seem to magically synch up. Whether this was
intentional or a pure mystical coincidence, only the guys in Floyd know for
sure. But this may be more a purposeful aligning of events than a random
one, leading many people with way too much time on their hands to watch a
host of old movies while listening to classic rock records, all in hopes of the
next big “connection.”
Time Prompts
People who experience time prompts and other synchronicities often refer to
them as “miracles.” Are they truly astonishing events, or are apophenia and
pareidolia the explanation? Remember the KISS principle. . . .
Cambridge University Professor J. E. Littlewood formed a new “law,”
known as Littlewood’s Law, stating that the average individual can expect to
experience one meaningful and significant event, that is, a miracle, each
month. This law, which he described in more detail in his A Mathematician’s
Miscellany , sought to put the kibosh on the “supernatural” nature of such
events. His rule is directly related to a theory that we will examine more
closely in chapter 9:9, which basically suggests that if you take a large
enough sample size of people, anything can (and usually does) happen!
Arguments aside, people are experiencing these linked events.
They are ascribing meaning to them. And, in the case of popular numbers
such as 11:11, they are assigning them a meaning ripe with collective
significance.
Some people might view this as proof that our lives are predestined— set in
stone and unchangeable. They view the occa-sional synchronicity as a
reminder of that inevitability every now and then. Others see these unusual
events as proof of the power of nothing more than cause and effect. One step
leading to another . . . and not necessarily along a predetermined path.
But even the mere cause and effect theory begs the question: how are the
causes and effects so intricately linked that each has such profound impact
on the other?
Entanglement
Perhaps we need to examine the issue at the molecular or subatomic level.
Could theoretical or quantum physics hold the key?
Within quantum physics, the theory of entanglement suggests that particles
that come in contact with one another remain “entangled” even over vast
distances of time and space. Eerily, while not physically connected, they can
have an instantaneous effect on the other.
This “spooky action at a distance” freaked out the likes of Einstein, who died
before it became acceptable as a fact. Entanglement all but guarantees that
cause and effect is happening constantly and instantly, and, if on a more
macrocosmic scale, showing up as the synchronistic experiences in our lives.
If, as physicist David Bohm states, reality is comprised of different levels—
the explicate being the reality we see and experience; the implicate being the
one we do not see underneath it all; and the super implicate being the sort of
“godlike” reality that encompasses the other two— then what appears to be
coincidence may simply be an event in one reality leaking over into the
other. The same could be said for the theories of alternate dimensions and
parallel universes, which are two popular concepts of theoretical and
quantum physics now gaining momentum with mainstream science.
An event occurring on Plane A in sequence with one occurring on Plane B
would seem random, yet in the bigger scheme of things, there is nothing
random about it at all. We may not see what goes on in Plane A, so we don’t
rationally make the connection that this was, indeed, a cause and effect
event. Just because you don’t see the initial cause doesn’t mean that it isn’t
there . . . somewhere.
In her book, The Rainbow and the Worm , Dr. Mae Wan Ho suggests that
some coherent nature of space and time may provide a framework for
another type of reality. “A coherent space-time structure theoretically
enables ‘instantaneous communications to occur over a range of time scales
and spatial extents.’ What this implies in practice is a vast, unexplored area,
as the notion of non-linear structured time this entails is alien to the
conventional, western scientific framework.”
Resonance
The idea of resonance also suggests that coherence of frequency, whether
between two particles, different systems of the human body, or any other
vibratory matter, can create the illusion, or quite possibly the reality, of
phenomena that might be considered “paranormal.” Two disparate events
occurring simultaneously would fall into this theory of instant
communication on a higher order of reality. Although the concept has been
proven on a quantum level, it remains to be scientifically accepted on a
grander scale.
Resonance may hold the key to a variety of unusual experiences, as we come
to understand more and more about the role vibration plays in the makeup of
matter and energy, as well as the way these things behave. The rate and
intensity of vibrational frequencies of objects can create either harmony or
discord between them, and perhaps it is when these frequencies complement
each other, or synchronize, all matter of spooky action can occur, including
paranormal events, psychic abilities, and strange coincidences that boggle
the mind.
Symmetries
Once again, symmetries play a significant role in not just the fundamental
nature of particles at the quantum level, but synchronicity, too. Werner
Heisenberg, the “father” of quantum theory, believed that the most
fundamental thing about nature was not necessarily particles, but particle
symmetries.
In his book Synchronicity: The Bridge Between Matter and Mind, F. David
Peat writes, “These symmetries could be thought of as the archetypes of all
matter and the ground of material existence. The elementary particles
themselves would simply be the material realizations of these underlying
symmetries.”
Heisenberg posited that these symmetries were the most fundamental level
of our reality itself, something beyond mere photons and electrons,
something that, as Peat words it, has “an immanent and formative role that is
responsible for the exterior forms of nature.” Peat goes on to ask, “Is it
possible that archetypal symmetries of this nature could also manifest
themselves in the internal structures of the mind?” What a great concept, in
terms of how “without” can affect that which is “within” and vice versa, thus
creating even more fertile ground for mysterious occurrences to take root.
Of course, the abstract natures of these symmetries have a mathematical
aspect to them as they take place in “mathematically defined spaces.”
However, Peat points out, this is not necessarily an indication that particles
“actually congregate together in space to form a pattern. Rather, it is their
individual dynamic activity that, taken together, forms a pattern of
mathematical transformations.”
And though we are talking about the dynamics of quantum matter, this same
theory may apply to the manifestation of synchronicities in the macrocosmic
world. Peat summarizes with this telling quote:
“In this way it will be shown that there is no ultimate distinction between the
mental and material so that synchronicities represent the explicit unfolding
of deeper orders.”
Because numbers are universal symbols, it makes sense that they should
appear so often in synchronistic experiences. Again, from Peat, “It is only
when certain aspects of the collective mind are projected into attention,
clothed in the images and symbols of our particular culture, that we become
aware of something universal that has come into the mind.” This might
explain the vast number of people who report thinking about an obscure,
seldom-played song only to have it be played magically over the airwaves at
just that instant.
Music, similar to math, is a collective language, an archetype we all operate
from on a deeper implicate level. Finally, we close again with Peat, who said
it so well: “Synchronicities are characterized by a unity of the universal with
the particular that lies within a coincidence of events.” The essence of this
universal is seen in nature as patterns, symmetries, and even the laws of
math that “interconnect a multiplicity of individual events.” And indeed the
possibility may exist that beneath this scientific framework lies a grid of
creative and formative order that Peat calls “the objective intelligence.”
Objective Intelligence
This objective intelligence is present throughout nature, perme-ating the
known laws with a mysterious presence of something higher at work than
mere functionality. Behind every structure there is an architect. Both the
quantum and cosmic worlds posit the importance of the observer, as well as
the conscious mind. In terms of synchronicities, we must also take into
account the collective and objective mind that acts as a potential repository
field from which our personal experiences rise. In this objective mind, the
links between event A and event B are formulated, to be experienced by the
subjective mind and given meaning to. Out of the chaos of nature, patterns
emerge, and we glom onto those patterns and offer our own personally
tailored interpretation. When they happen as often as time prompts do, the
meaning becomes ever more important and profound.
In his book The Synchronized Universe: New Science of the Paranormal,
physicist Claude Swanson, PhD, talks about the role of synchronicity on
both the quantum and cosmic scale, and its relationship to the manifestation
of paranormal. Though his massive tome refers more to psi, ghosts, and
remote viewing, his theory of a reality made up of layers of universes makes
for interesting mental fodder. Swanson posits that paranormal events can
alter the structure of otherwise random or quantum noise, and thus alter the
probability of events. Though we first need a more clearly defined
understanding of the nature of this quantum noise, he notes that the potential
exists to “extend current physics theory to understand and explain
paranormal phenomenon.” Swanson discusses the Zero Point Field (ZPF) as
a possible state of fundamental quantum reality from which all matter, form,
and energy springs forth.
According to the Calphysics Institute:
Quantum mechanics predicts the existence of what are usually called “zero-
point” energies for the strong, the weak and the electromagnetic interactions,
where “zero-point” refers to the energy of the system at temperature T=0, or
the lowest quantized energy level of a quantum mechanical system . . .
Zero-point energy is the energy that remains when all other energy is
removed from a system.
This field of inquiry, championed by the work of physicist Hal Puthoff, one
of the founders of the earliest university-backed remote viewing studies,
could be the generative, formative field from which objective intelligence
operates. That the universe itself is filled with fluctuating energy of random
photons virtually popping in and out of existence suggests a potential hotbed
of anomalous phenomena that might exist as well. The field of all
potentiality, as Deepak Chopra referred to it, might contain within it all the
information needed to create the synchronistic events we call coincidence. In
addition, in this landscape of the field, where past, present, and future exist
all at once, we might also find the origins of those strange, related
experiences of déjà vu.
Swanson also cites resonance as a key to the synching of levels of reality.
This synchronization would theoretically allow communication between
levels, as well as create a Synchronized Universe Model (SUM). In
summary, this SUM assumes that “all particles in the universe interact with
one another,” yet takes it a step further to posit that distant matter
communicates with local electrons via the motion of photons, a connection
that embodies the Mach Principle of distant matter determining local inertia
and local forces.
What does this have to do with seeing the number 10 fifty times in one day?
Swanson believed the Mach Principle was a fundamental insight into the
connectivity of reality, matter, and energy. Local forces having their origin in
the distant matter of space.
Swanson’s description of a layered reality of universes that, through
resonance and coherence, could “synch up” and allow for the crossing of
matter and energy, not to mention the possibility of paranormal phenomena,
also suggests that the ability of events that seem to occur in different spatial
and even temporal frames could “synch up” and create a miracle or
coincidence. Thus, time prompts could be coming to us from different
dimensions of space, as well as different dimensions of time.
Swanson refers to a single synchronized universe “represented by one sheet
of paper in a stack. Each sheet has its own unique frequency and/or phase
that characterize the synchronized motion of the electrons in that system.
Other sheets represent ‘parallel realities’ or other ‘parallel dimensions’ that
may cohabit the same space and time and yet be unaware of one another.”
But in the phase-locking of two or more “sheets,” there is interaction of a
synchronized manner. When the sheets are not in synch, no cross-talk
occurs, and things appear as normal, even as random chance, with no
connectivity to boggle the mind and startle the senses.
Consciousness, Swanson suggests, “interacts across these parallel
dimensions. Thus it can affect and reduce the quantum noise. It can even
synchronize motions between parallel realities. In this way higher forces
(subtle energies) can be created, and energy can be extracted from these
other dimensions.”
When particles are in synch on their own “sheet,” they obey the physical
laws of that sheet. However, when they are in synch with those on a
corresponding sheet, “the most dramatic paranormal effects are expected.”
It’s an intriguing theory that does align with many concepts of both quantum
and theoretical physics, and could also explain the ability of events to align
and synch up at just the right place and time. If that is truly the case, then
events may appear to have happened not at all by chance, but by some
deeper design with deeper meaning. The mind or consciousness itself may
even act similarly to this sheet system, with thoughts and interpretations
moving between the objective intelligent state into the subjective, where
significance is then either formulated or tossed aside.
Again, information comes at us from all angles, even other layers of reality,
but we choose which is important and what we pay attention to, based upon
our survival needs. Yet every now and then, a thought or interpretation may
slip through the veil of distraction and grab us by the collar, waking us up to
the possibility that there is more to reality than meets the eye.
Chapter 8:8 JUST SIX NUMBERS?
God made the integers, all the rest is the work of man.
—Leopold Kronecker
Theories abound that the entire universe is based upon a very small and
select group of numbers— mathematical equations that describe the whole
of reality with intricate beauty and amazingly efficient detail. Physicists
have long attempted to discover the magical Theory of Everything (TOE).
This elusive theory will hopefully bring a seamless connection between the
four fundamental forces of gravity, electromagnetism, and the strong and
weak nuclear forces. Other theories regarding a universal framework also
exist. One such theory is IT— Information Theory. IT is the concept of the
universe as a computer, processing information in an increasing,
compounding rate and spitting out new information to continuously expand
what we see and experience as reality. Due to long-standing hesitance to
change, scientists are only now beginning to openly discuss their belief in
Information Theory.
But before we delve into Information Theory and attempt to show how the
universe seemingly behaves like a computer proces-sor, with “reality”
actually being comprised of “its and bits” that shape and mold matter, we
need to examine the importance of numbers in the creation of the universe
itself.
SIX NUMBER THEORY
In his book Just Six Numbers , Sir Martin Rees, the Royal Society Research
Professor at Cambridge University and Astronomer Royal, makes a bold
case for explaining how just six fundamental numbers can explain the
entirety of the physical cosmos. These numbers, “constant values that
describe and define everything from the way atoms are held together to the
amount of matter in our universe,” were imprinted during the Big Bang itself
and began a process of cosmic evolution that allowed for the creation of
stars and galaxies, as well as all of the necessary energy states that govern
matter and force as we know it. “Mathematical laws underpin the fabric of
our universe— not just atoms, but galaxies, stars and people,” Rees writes.
“Science advances by discerning patterns and regularities in nature, so that
more and more phenomena can be subsumed into general categories and
laws.” The goal of theorists, Rees continues, is to one day “encapsulate the
essence of the physical laws in a unified set of equations.”
Rees, as well as the growing number of researchers who have picked up on
his work, believes that these mathematical values are so sensitive that if any
of them were “untuned,” there could be no stars and, therefore, no life— at
least not life as we know and recognize it today. The reason these six
numbers are so critical, Rees states, is because “two of them relate to the
basic forces; two fix the size and overall ‘texture’ of our universe and
determine whether it will continue forever; and two more fix the properties
of space itself. . . .” Different choices of the six fundamental numbers, Rees
tells us, would give us a much different universe . . . maybe even a sterile
one.
The six fundamental numbers that shape the universe, and helped make it in
the first place, are:
1. Nu—“N,” a critically huge number with the value of
1,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 . This is a ratio of the
strength of electrical forces holding atoms together, divided by the force of
gravity (which is 10 to the 37th power) between them. If this number were
smaller, even by a few zeros, it has been posted that the universe’s lifes-pan
would be too short for biological evolution to occur. As Rees states, a short-
lived universe would mean that no creatures could ever grow larger than
insects, with no time for biological evolution to unfold. Thus, a buggy world
indeed.
2. Epsilon— 0.007. Another ratio, this time the proportion of energy
released when hydrogen fuses into helium. This number defines how firmly
atomic nuclei bind together and how all of the atoms on earth were made.
The value of epsilon controls the power from the sun and how stars
transmute hydrogen into all the atoms of the periodic table. Carbon and
oxygen are common, and gold and uranium are rare, because of what
happens in the stars. Were this number 0.006, or 0.008, Rees states that we
could not possibly exist, again suggesting that the smallest tweaks would
have resulted in a universe far different from this one.
3. Omega— The cosmic number 1 measures the amount of material in our
universe— galaxies, diffuse gas, and dark matter. Omega refers to the
relative importance of gravity and expansion energy in the universe.
According to Rees, a universe with too high of an Omega level would have
collapsed long ago; too low, no galaxies would have formed. The
inflationary theory of the Big Bang says omega should be one, but
astronomers have yet to measure its exact value. Some scientists point to the
finely tuned initial speed of expansion as a hint of Creative Intelligence.
4. Lambda — The force of cosmic antigravity that was discovered in 1998.
This is an extremely small number and appears to control the expansion of
the universe; however, it has no effect on scales of less than a billion light
years. If lambda were any larger, its effect would have stopped galaxies and
stars from forming, and cosmic evolution would have been “stifled before it
could even begin.”
5. Q = 1/100,000— The basic seeds for all cosmic structures such as stars,
galaxies, and clusters of galaxies, all of which were imprinted in the Big
Bang itself. The fabric— or texture— of our universe depends on a number
that represents the ratio of two fundamental energies. If Q were smaller, the
universe would be inert and without structure; if Q were much larger, the
universe would be a violent place where no stars or suns could exist,
dominated by giant black holes.
6. Delta— 3. The number of spatial dimensions in our world.
Rees argues that life can only exist in three dimensions, not two or four. This
number, it seems, has been known for hundreds of years, but is now being
viewed in a whole new way, especially in light of superstring theory, which
posits that the most fundamental underlying structure are vibrating
superstrings that operate in a potentially ten-dimensional “arena.”
So far, Rees and his colleagues have been unable to find the one great
undeniable link between all these numbers that would result in a
mathematical Theory of Everything (TOE), if one such theory exists, but
these fundamental ratios and numbers do build one upon the next to create a
sort of cosmic blueprint. These “pieces of a puzzle” may possibly be used to
describe the nature of the universe and its forces, and certainly speak to the
idea that beneath it all there is a grand plan or design that works. We humans
are proof of that.
Just How Finely Tuned Is the Universe?
It is quite spooky to think that with some minor tweaks here and there, we
would not exist. These are just some of the reasons why. . . .
If the strong nuclear force constant was larger: no hydrogen would form;
atomic nuclei for most life-essential elements would be unstable; thus, no
life. If smaller: no elements heavier than hydrogen would form; again, no
life.
If the weak nuclear force constant was larger: too much hydrogen would
convert to helium in big bang; stars would convert too much matter into
heavy elements making life impossible. If smaller: too little helium would be
produced and stars would convert too little matter into heavy elements,
making life impossible.
If the gravitational force constant was larger: stars would be too hot and
would burn too rapidly and too unevenly for life chemistry. If smaller: stars
would be too cool to ignite nuclear fusion; thus, many of the elements
needed for life chemistry would never form.
If the ratio of electromagnetic force constant to gravitational force constant
was larger: all stars would be at least 40 percent more massive than the sun;
stellar burning would be too brief and too uneven for life. If smaller: stars
would be at least 20 percent less massive than sun and incapable of
producing heavy elements.
If the ratio of electron to proton mass was larger: chemical bonding would
be insufficient for life. If smaller: same as above.
If the ratio of number of protons to number of electrons was larger:
electromagnetism would dominate gravity, preventing galaxy, star, and
planet formation. If smaller: same as the previous reason.
If the expansion rate of the universe was larger: no galaxies would form. If
smaller: the universe would collapse, even before stars formed Adapted from
Hugh Ross, PhD, The Creator and the Cosmos
Reasons for the Universe
In Rees’s opinion, there are three explanations for the finely tuned universe
in which we seem to live, one that is dependent upon the previously
discussed six numbers. First, we must consider sheer coincidence. It is
certainly a possibility that we are here just because that’s the way the
numbers were tuned with no deeper meaning attached. Second, many
scientists suggest that the specific tuning of these six numbers, so intricately
perfect, lends itself to the argument in favor of a Creator— or “intelligent
design.” This theory is gaining ground with reputable scientists as a viable
alternative to the long-standing belief in evolutionism. According to the
official website of ID ( intelligentdesign.org ): Intelligent design refers to a
scientific research program as well as a community of scientists,
philosophers and other scholars who seek evidence of design in nature. The
theory of intelligent design holds that certain features of the universe and of
living things are best explained by an intelligent cause, not an undirected
process such as natural selection.
Through the study and analysis of a system’s components, a design theorist
is able to determine whether various natural structures are the product of
chance, natural law, intelligent design, or some combination thereof. Such
research is conducted by observing the types of information produced when
intelligent agents act. Scientists then seek to find objects [that] have those
same types of informational properties
[that] we commonly know come from intelligence. Intelligent design has
applied these scientific methods to detect design in irreducibly complex
biological structures, the complex and specified information content in
DNA, the life-sustaining physical architecture of the universe, and the
geologically rapid origin of biological diversity in the fossil record during
the Cambrian explosion approximately 530 million years ago.
At the very least, this Creator wanted us humans to show up, and tuned the
universe with that specific intention in mind. “If you imagine setting up the
universe by adjusting six dials, then the tuning must be precise in order to
yield a universe that could harbor life,” Rees states. The question is: who or
what is responsible for the tuning? (See chapter 10:10 for more on this!)
Last, but certainly not least, is the idea that we are not alone in terms of
being the only universe to have experienced a Big Bang.
Other universes may exist, each with their own rate of cooling, their own
fine-tuning, and their own laws, which are defined in the end by a different
set of numbers. As Rees puts it, “This may not seem an ‘economical’
hypothesis— indeed, nothing might seem more extravagant than invoking
multiple universes— but it is a natural deduction from some (albeit
speculative) theories, and opens up a new vision of our universe as just one
‘atom’ selected from an infinite multiverse.”
The intricate omega, for example, which simply describes the density of the
universe, is so precise that, as a result, we are all able to exist. It’s
confounding to think that were this value just a tiny bit higher, our infant
universe might not have begun expanding, and gravitational forces would
have run amok, causing what some describe as a “great crunch” instead of a
“big bang.” And if the amount of mass present was any lower, gravity would
never have had a chance to allow particles to connect and interact, forming
into objects, and ultimately life. Were these tunings just the result of the way
matter and energy blew apart during the Big Bang itself?
Was this intricacy coded somehow into the pre-Bang singularity from which
the universe was formed? When was the plan written . . . and by whom or
what? Let’s look at “N.”
N
“N” dictates how big the universe is allowed to get, and beyond that or
below that value, the gravitational force might exceed the electric force, and
the universe would not exist. Were gravity significantly stronger than we
know it, our reality might be very different, and we would likely be seeing a
lot more black holes around us. Definitely not a good thing! The relationship
between electromagnetism and gravity is, again, so finely tuned as to allow
for things to be just as they are, from the smallest to the largest objects,
governed by laws that keep things in a cohesive state. One minor tweak, and
it would be utter chaos.
Each of these six fundamental numbers would seem to be utterly critical to
the absolute “rightness” of the universe that we live in, a rightness that
allowed for all the perfect combinations, events, and interactions to lead to
life, at least on our little planet. According to Is God a Mathematician by
Mario Livio, English astronomer James Jeans said, “The universe appears to
have been designed by a pure mathematician.” The laws that govern motion,
gravitation, force, and matter are all, at their foundation, mathematical laws
that give order to nature and form the bedrock of all physical reality.
The word astronomy itself means “law of the stars,” and those laws have
their basis in mathematics. Even the esteemed 13th-century scholar Roger
Bacon recognized that natural laws were fundamentally mathematical laws.
According to the classic Encyclopedia Brit-tanica , Bacon’s Opus Majus
states:
“Part IV” (pp. 57–255) contains an elaborate treatise on mathematics, “the
alphabet of philosophy,” maintaining that all the sciences rest ultimately on
mathematics, and progress only when their facts can be subsumed under
mathematical principles. This fruitful thought he illustrates by showing how
geometry is applied to the action of natural bodies, and demonstrating by
geometrical figures certain laws of physical forces. He also shows how his
method may be used to determine some curious and long-discussed
problems, such as the light of the stars, the ebb and flow of the tide, the
motion of the balance. He then proceeds to adduce elaborate and sometimes
slightly grotesque reasons tending to prove that mathematical knowledge is
essential in theology, and closes this section of his work with two
comprehensive sketches of geography and astronomy. That on geography is
particularly good, and is interesting as having been read by Columbus, who
lighted on it in Petrus de Alliaco’s Imago Mundi, and was strongly
influenced by its reasoning.
In his book The Goldilocks Enigma: Why Is the Universe Just Right for Life?
author and physicist Paul Davies states, “The ancients were right: beneath
the surface complexity of nature lies a hidden subtext, written in a subtle
mathematical code. This cosmic code contains the secret rules on which the
universe runs.” Davies, also the author of The Mind of God , reminds us that
early scientists such as Galileo and Newton believed that by exposing the
patterns behind the fabric of nature, they could somehow get a glimpse of
the mind of God.
This religious quest parallels the more modern belief by today’s scientists,
many of them by no means religious, where Davies says that “an intelligible
script underlies the workings of nature, for to believe otherwise would
undermine the very motivation for doing research, which is to uncover
something meaningful about the world that we don’t already know.”
Davies believes that science has indeed “uncovered the existence of this
concealed mathematical domain.” We humans, he goes on, have been made
“privy to the deepest workings of the universe,” and, unlike the animals who
simply observe these workings, we humans alone have the power to try to
explain them.
Many theories and explanations regarding the nature of the universe exist,
and like the turtle theory in the sidebar, there must be what is called the
“termination of the chain of explanation.” To explain a theory, there must be
a beginning and an end. A start and a finish. The woman at this lecture
apparently felt that a bottomless chain of turtles was a perfectly rational and
reasonable explanation, or perhaps, as Paul Davies suggests in The
Goldilocks Enigma , there is a levitating super-turtle upon which the chain of
turtles stands.
Of course, we can laugh at this concept, but it illustrates the difficulties that
come along with theorizing anything about the nature of reality itself!
Perhaps the joke is on us.
THIS UNIVERSE . . . AND BEYOND!
As we continue to make further advancements into the study of cosmology,
and our ability to see into the heart of deep space im-proves, other ratios and
numbers may be added to complete the architectural framework of the
cosmos. These six initial and fundamental numbers also may provide for the
possibility of multidimensional strings and parallel universes. Rees himself
is a proponent of the multiverse theory, and the idea is growing in popularity
among theoretical and quantum physicists. According to an article by
Aurelien Barrau in the International Journal of High-Energy Physics, “The
idea of multiple universes is more than a fantastic invention. It appears
naturally within several theories, and deserves to be taken seriously.” Barrau
further states:
“This multiverse— if true— would force a profound change of our deep
understanding of physics. The laws reappear as kinds of phenomena; the
ontological primer of our Universe would have to be abandoned. At other
places in the multiverse, there would be other laws, other constants, other
numbers of dimensions; our world would be just a tiny sample. It could be,
following Copernicus, Dar-win, and Freud, the fourth narcissistic injury.”
Numbers or Turtles?
There is a story often attributed to both Bertrand Russell and to the 19th-
century American philosopher William James. The story revolves around a
lecture being given about the nature of the universe. Halfway through the
lecture, a woman stands up in the back of the room and denounces the
lecturer, proudly claim-ing that she knows the exact nature of how the
universe is put together. Her claim? That the Earth rests on the back of a
giant elephant that is, in turn, standing on the back of a giant turtle.
Stunned, the lecturer asks her what the turtle is standing upon.
The woman shouts back, “You must be a very clever young man, but you
can’t fool me! It’s turtles all the way down!”
In fact, quite simply, different universes would have formed at different
rates, cooled at different rates, and therefore be governed by different laws,
numbers, and ratios from our own. Thus, our Big Bang could have been one
of many (part of M-theory) that was created with its own specific set of
mathematical components at the core of its expansion and evolution. In our
universe, these six cosmic numbers are the only things that keep us from
being one of those badly tuned universes where nothing expands, forms,
coheres. . . . Talk about being in the right place at the right time! The
subatomic forces that shape and mold our very reality exist because of such
a honed, perfected tuning of the rate of expansion after the Big Bang. The
sensitivity to these six numbers seems apparent in the physical laws that
governed the processes behind the formation of galaxies, stars, and planetary
systems.
Undoubtedly, this raises more questions than answers. The biggest questions
the mathematical nature of order begs are: Can there then be an
“intelligence” behind these numbers? Is this a stable system, and is there
room for such concepts as entropy, disorder, and chaos? The idea that these
numbers are attuned, and create a potential formula that links them together,
then begs the question: Who or what “attuned” them? The mathematical
formulas behind all six values are so perfectly deliberate one would think
that the creative force of the entirety of reality was a gigantic calculator . . .
or perhaps a computer. We will first look at the concept of the universe as a
computer, which again will ask those pesky questions: Who is the Master
Programmer? Who developed the initial language?
The Universe as a Computer
The question on the lips of many cutting-edge mathematicians,
cosmologists, astronomers, and physicists is: Could the universe simply be a
massive quantum computer?
In order to explain the vast complexities of our universe, many scientists
look to the technology age as a guide to just what might account for the
sheer volume of “stuff” that fills our world. The basis of this theory starts
with the idea that particles and their interactions are not solely responsible
for transferring energy but information as well. Bits of information.
Bits and bits.
“The universe is the biggest thing there is and the bit is the smallest possible
chunk of information. The universe is made of bits. Every molecule, atom,
and elementary particle registers bits of information. Every interaction
between those pieces of the universe processes that information by altering
those bits . . . the universe is a quantum computer,” writes Professor Seth
Lloyd in Programming the Universe: A Quantum Computer Scientist Takes
on the Cosmos.
In an interview with the Edge Foundation, Professor Lloyd states: It’s been
known for more than a hundred years, ever since Maxwell, that all physical
systems register and process information. For instance, this little inchworm
right here has something on the order of Avogadro’s number of atoms.
And dividing by Boltzmann’s concept, its entropy is on the order of
Avogadro’s number of bits. This means that it would take about Avogadro’s
number of bits to describe that little guy and how every atom and molecule
is jiggling around in his body in full detail. Every physical system registers
information, and just by evolving in time, by doing its thing, it changes that
information, transforms that information, or, if you like, processes that
information.
Is it possible that, like a giant information processing system, the universe
computed itself into existence via the Big Bang? Once this initial
computation is complete, perhaps it then compounds the amount of initially
programmed information with newly computed information . . . then “it”
begins the task of processing it all over again in a cyclical pattern. The result
is a snowball effect of continuously created “stuff,” the variety of which is
ever-increasing, ever-expanding.
The formation of atoms and other elementary particles, then, would consist
of specific amounts of information in the form of its and bits, and as the
universe processes this information to create more particles and matter, it
also corresponds to the laws of physics, chemistry, and biology— all of our
known laws that govern structural behavior and other physical elements.
Similar to a huge computational system, the universe appears to some to
have a “scripted quality” that suggests, as Seth Lloyd states, “the same astral
dramas are played out again and again by different stellar actors in different
places.”
In a computational universe system, entropy acts as the “information
required to specify the random motions of atoms and molecules.” These
motions are too small to be seen or measured, so Lloyd posits that entropy
can also be described as that information in a physical system that we cannot
see— one that remains outside our visible awareness. Entropy also
determines the amount of thermal energy in a system that has usefulness.
Entropy is an integral part of the second law of thermodynamics, which
states that the entropy of the universe does not decrease as a whole, but
rather the amount of unusable energy increases. One way to think about the
concept of entropy is to picture it corresponding in quantity to the number of
bits required to describe or quantify the jiggle of atoms. Heat itself is the
energy behind the jiggle; entropy describes the information behind the
jiggle.
As a giant computer, the its and bits of information that are required to
process anything and everything into existence that we can see— that is, a
planet— prove staggering in number. But even the materials required to
form an electron requires a staggeringly large number of pieces of
information, again, most of which remains beyond our visibility.
“Ultimately,” Lloyd writes, “information and energy play complementary
roles in the universe: Energy makes physical systems do things. Information
tells them what to do.”
This interplay between the physical and the informative, physics and
information, is the dance of the “computational nature” of the universe itself.
In the mid-20th century, such notable scientists as Harry Nyquist, Claude
Shannon, Norbert Wiener, and their colleagues devised and formulated the
theory behind the mathematical nature of this interplay with the utilization of
mathematical arguments to create actual amounts of information that would
be required to do specific things. An example of this would be in the number
of bits required to send a communication down a telephone line. These
researchers formulated what is now “Information Theory,” which was later
refined by James Clerk Maxwell and Ludwig Boltzmann.
In an interview with Jason Cosmowiki of Strange Ideas , Seth Lloyd
described the universe as “one big honking quantum mechanical computer,”
suggesting that the universe itself is simply a simulation. A representation
that is so exact that one could not distinguish it from reality. Although this
sounds very “Matrix-esque,” the idea that the universe acts as a quantum
computer suggests that decoherence is the key to what we then see as reality.
When quantum bits decohere, or choose one path over another in the
processing progression, specific structures arise and form. According to
adherents of the quantum universal model, this is what gives the universe the
appearance of being “programmed.” The suggestion is that specific choices
are made within the system as they would be in a computer, where certain its
and bits of information are utilized above others, with the end result being
what we see and perceive as everything from atoms to black holes. Different
choices suggest a different universe.
In his book Decoding the Universe: How the New Science of Information Is
Explaining Everything in the Cosmos, from Our Brains to Black Holes
(which wins the grand prize for world’s longest book title!), author Charles
Seife examines this concept of a Cosmic Computer. Seife, like a growing
number of researchers, believes that this computer has programmed itself
and all of reality into existence. Pretty heady stuff!
Seife looks at Information Theory as a way to possibly understand the odd
principles at play in the universe by focusing on the physicality of
information. Information, he suggests, is a “concrete property of matter and
energy which is quantifiable and measurable.”
Yet this information is subject to physical laws, and these laws, as in any
other area of natural science, do dictate the behavior of mass and energy as
information.
All of this information has to be transmitted and communicated, and this
process of transmitting its and bits through space uses energy, all of which is
measurable and precisely programmed to deliver a specific coded set of
information that will eventually be a planet or star. The universe, thus, could
indeed be the fastest and most efficient computer ever dreamt of by those
who follow Moore’s Law. Moore’s Law was created in 1965 by Gordon
Moore, cofounder of Intel, and states that the total number of transistors per
square inch on integrated circuits (IC) had doubled every year since the IC
was invented. As a measurement of computing power, Moore’s Law
basically states that computing power doubles roughly every two years.
Imagine the amount of computing power within the universal computational
system doubling at such a rate! The sheer volume of information would be
staggering, snowballing into more information with farther reaching
capabilities. It’s truly astounding to think of the potential power and speed of
this system.
But again, all of this begs the question, who or what is doing the
programming?
And going back to the multiverse theory, one might also ask, does each
universe have its own program/programmer, or is there a Master
Program/Programmer behind the curtain, as in Oz? These are the challenges
of Information Theory’s leading proponents, who seek to comprehend and
understand the power of the its and bits.
Pi
Six numbers and its and bits aside, there is another number that seems to
speak of a nature far more profound than its quantitative value. Pi, or 3.14, is
nothing more than the ratio of the circumference of a circle to its diameter.
Pi is the 16th letter of the Greek alphabet. In the system of Greek numerals it
has a value of 80.
Based on the Greek word periferia , meaning “circumference,”
and represented by the Greek letter p , this simple irrational number has
The symbols for pi are universal, as origins so ancient that some schol-is the
meaning behind the symbols.
Scholars say they may be untraceable to the source. Pi is not only an
irrational number, meaning that it is unable to be expressed as a ratio of two
different integers and that its decimal expression never ends and never starts
recurring, but it is also what is known as a “transcendental number.” These
numbers are described by Wikipedia as “a complex number that is not
algebraic; that is, not a solution of a non-zero polynomial equation with
rational coefficients. In other words, transcendental numbers are numbers
that do not arise from ordinary algebraic expressions.”
Although Pi is certainly an interesting number, its mystique likely comes
from the fact that it is one of the oldest mathematical quantities that we can
trace throughout history. Some scholars attribute Archimedes with the first
real theoretical work involving pi, with other mathematicians adding to the
growing body of understanding of this simple number throughout the ages.
One of the most fascinating aspects of pi is its ability to calculate the
circumference of a circle around massively large spheres. This computation
can be performed to a very high degree of accuracy thanks to its infinite
decimal expansion.
Pi is one of those unusual numbers, as are omega, delta, and the others about
which Sir Martin Rees writes that would no doubt be the same for an alien
from another universe. It represents a relationship, a ratio that is always
going to be the same value, no matter what universe you are in, and no
matter the size of the object of measurement. Pi is pi no matter where you
go. This type of constant is literally a part of the fabric of our universe, and
perhaps many others as well.
Pi has a reputation as being somewhat of a “controversial” number, with
several alternate interpretations being hypothesized. According to Michael
Hayes, author of The Hermetic Code in DNA: The Sacred Principles in the
Ordering of the Universe , pi is associated with music, harmonics, and DNA
itself. The “mathematical convention pi,” as he refers to it, corresponds with
the numerals 22/7, a symbol of the “triple octave,” and a formula fully
known about by ancient Egyptians, who incorporated it into their daily
activities, as well as with the building of the pyramids. This same
relationship is also apparent in the pyramid structures of Teoti-huacán,
Mexico, and, as Hayes states, even England’s Stonehenge.
Does this sound suspiciously like a sacred number?
Pi’s musical association is, according to Hayes, “designed to express the law
of seven and the law of three— the triple octave, composed of 22 notes.”
Each of the three individual octaves is also composed of three “inner”
octaves, Hayes proposes, totaling nine octaves and “exactly 64 fundamental
notes, the square of the constant number 8.” Hayes calls this the “Hermetic
Code,” and states it is a universal formula found everywhere, including the
structure of our own DNA.
The “mathematical” pi has a value closer to 3.14159. The “classical” pi
value is 3.142857. . . . Regardless, the universal symmetry Hayes and other
researchers have found between pi and the fundamentals of harmonics also
seems present in the structure of the genetic code, which we will discuss
further in chapter 10:10. Hayes states, “The Hermetic Code, as we know, is
primarily an expression of the law of triple creation, which holds that
everything is composed of trinities within trinities. This means that the three
individual octaves embodied within pi are in themselves triple
octaves, making nine octaves in total, or sixty-four notes— precisely the
number of RNA codon combinations.”
This has very far-reaching implications, and as Hayes writes: Where this
conclusion leaves us, the human race, we can but speculate, but the fact that
the genetic code of the microcosmic world of the cell, and the hermetic code
in the macrocosmic world of the human mind are absolutely identical is
surely significant. It, in fact, brings to mind the principal dictum of Hermes
Trismegistus, which was inscribed on the legendary Emerald Tablet: “As
above, so below.”
The implication one immediately draws from this is that the only difference
between the DNA helix and a fully functional human brain is simply one of
scale. And if the human brain is a kind of metaphysical “helix,” then
presumably it is also an integral component— a cell-nucleus—in the body of
an infinitely greater, multidimensional “organism”—our own galaxy,
perhaps.
Pi’s magnificence suggests again that behind all of what we see and don’t
see, there is a structured measurement with mathematical principles. The
very fabric, and foundation, of our existence, and how we measure the world
of reality around us, is entirely dependent on numbers. Yet, this dependency
hints strongly that there is a force behind the math of such vast and precise
intelligence and order.
Chapter 9:9 THE TROUBLE WITH NUMBERS
The last function of reason is to recognize that there are an infinity of things
which surpass it.
—Blaise Pascal
As we have seen in the preceding chapters, numbers and mathematical
modalities play an integral role in virtually all aspects of our existence.
Mathematical law may even serve as the foundation for all of reality. The
universe could probably be described within the confines of just six
numbers. The laws of physics might actually be the laws of the land.
Wouldn’t the seeming simplicity of that concept be a refreshing change from
our complex and busied existence? If we could take numbers and their
properties at face value, life might be so much less . . . well . . . intricate.
But that suggestion doesn’t necessarily mean that numbers are always the
magical, mystical, and mysterious miracles that we imagine them to be. Any
good writer, or writing team, in this case, worth its weight in gold would be
remiss to pass up the chance to play devil’s advocate and present the
opposing viewpoint. Even when it comes to numbers and the profound
mystique they suggest, we have to understand that there are other laws that
take the complex and swap it for the simple. Remember our friend William
of Ockham and his principle of Ockham’s razor? With all other things being
equal, generally the simplest possible explanation is the correct one.
Many of the more mundane laws involving numbers were discovered out of
the sheer curiosity of mathematicians and scientists who were simply not
satisfied with the “magical” properties ascribed to specific patterns and rates
of frequency that were uncovered during their research.
PASCAL’S TRIANGLE
Consider Pascal’s Triangle. This is a geometric arrangement of digits that
describe the “binomial coefficients” in a triangle. In plain English, that
means that “in mathematics, the binomial coefficient is the coefficient of the
xk term in the polynomial expansion of the binomial power (1 + x ) n . In
combinatorics, it is often called the choose function of n and k ; it is the
number of k -element sub-sets (the k -combinations) of an n -element set;
that is, the number of ways that k things can be ‘chosen’ from a set of n
things.” That description, from Wikipedia, would take a textbook to explain,
but our interest in Pascal’s Triangle goes far beyond what it helps determine
the value of.
This intriguing Triangle was named after Blaise Pascal, who first wrote
about his use of the Triangle to solve problems in probability theory back in
1655. But the Triangle had been studied and written about much earlier, even
as far back as the 10th century in commentaries written about the ancient
Sanskrit Chandas Shas-tra . This work initially dates the use of the Triangle
back to the 5th century BC, with the Indian mathematician Bhattotpala later
expanding upon the rows of the Triangle. Persian mathematician Al-Karaji
and astronomer-mathematician Omar Khayyam further expounded upon the
Triangle between 953 and 1131 AD, thus the added name of “Khayyam’s
Triangle.”
Thanks to mathematician Yang Hui in the 13th century, the Chinese had their
own version, today known as “Yang Hui’s Triangle.” Later, Italian algebraist
Niccolo Fontana Tartaglia put his Pascal’s Triangle up to row 7.
own spin on the Triangle, developing a formula for solving cubic
polynomials— one hundred years before Pascal began his own work! Of
course, Italians refer to it as “Tartaglia’s Triangle” in homage to their
countryman.
The interesting point is that, similar to pi, Pascal’s Triangle is a formulaic
sequence, a numeric description of repeating patterns that can look quite
magical, especially when it was discovered by some of those ancient math
wizards that the Fibonacci numbers were embedded within the Triangle. But
similar to pi, there are sound mathematical properties underlying what some
might look upon as a “number mystery.”
Pascal’s Triangle does indeed contain some eye-opening patterns:
• If one looks at the odd numbers only, you get what closely resembles the
fractal known as Sierpinski Triangle, and the closer to infinity you get in the
number of rows, the more it matches the Sierpinski Triangle.
• The value of each row, if each number in that row is considered as a
decimal place and numbers over 9 are carried over, is a power of 11. Here
again, the number 11 plays a significant role in mathematical patterns.
• By skipping over certain numbers at specific angles you get sums of
Fibonacci numbers.
• Diagonals along the left and right edges contain only 1’s.
• Diagonals next to the edge diagonals contain natural numbers in order.
• In rows where the second number is prime, all the terms in that row except
the first 1’s are multiples of that same prime number.
According to goldennumber.net , a few more interesting properties of
Pascal’s Triangle include:
• Horizontal rows add to powers of 2 (that is, 1, 2, 4, 8, 16, and so on).
• The horizontal rows represent powers of 11 (1, 11, 121, 1331, and so on).
• Adding any two successive numbers in the diagonal 1-3-6-10-15-21-28 . . .
results in a perfect square (1, 4, 9, 16, and so on).
• It can be used to find combinations in probability problems (if, for
instance, you pick any two of five items, the number of possible
combinations is 10, found by looking in the second place of the fifth row. Do
not count the 1s.)
• When the first number to the right of the 1 in any row is a prime number,
all numbers in that row are divisible by that prime number.
Similar to the Fibonacci Sequence, Pascal’s Triangle does hint at a “higher”
intelligence behind its construction. Although numbers seem to have their
own laws and rules, many mathematicians and scientists refuse to ascribe
mystical powers to them. Perhaps they are shortsighted, for it seems that
neither sacred numbers nor time prompts are enough to convince them of the
magical powers of numbers. Or could it be that perhaps these rules and laws
are more bland than we would like to think?
Here is a challenge we found on the website for Plus Magazine (
plus.maths.org ). Look up a bunch of naturally occurring numbers, such as
the lengths of some of the world’s rivers or the population sizes in Peruvian
provinces. Take a sample of those naturally occurring numbers and look at
their first digits (ignore zero for now).
Then count how many numbers start with 1, how many start with 2, then 3,
and so on.
Benford’s Law
As you might expect, the end result would be that the same number of
numbers begin with each differing digit, and that the proportion of numbers
beginning with any of the specific digits between 1 and 9 would be 1/9.
Right? Is that your final answer?
Wrong. The distribution of first digits is not so spread out, and, in fact, the
most common starting digit will always be 1, while the least common is 9.
Believe it or not, there is actually a formula that describes this, a law.
Benford’s Law, also known as “First-Digit Law.”
This law basically states that groups or lists of numbers from real-life
sources will follow a specific pattern of leading digit frequency.
Canadian-American astronomer and mathematician Simon Newcomb
(1835–1909) is credited as the first person to take notice of this amazing law.
He wrote about it in his 1881 paper “Note on the Frequency of Use of the
Different Digits in Natural Numbers.”
While Newcomb’s observation was important, it was physicist Frank
Benford that, in 1938 upon seeing the same patterns in his own research,
finally put two and two together. Benford conducted some real-world
experimental sampling, which was intended to prove the law that would later
be named after him. He collected vast sums of data, including the addresses
of the first 342 people listed in American Men of Science . In his analysis, he
found that approximately 30 percent began with 1, 18 percent with 2, and so
on. This pattern was repeatable with other sets of data, similar to baseball
statistics, death rates, stock prices, street addresses, and electricity bills, but
even Benford was at a loss to explain exactly why it worked.
Fast forward to around 1961, when American mathematician Roger Pinkham
took the issue on. Pinkham believed that a potential explanation for this
pattern could be explained. He supposed that there was indeed a law of
“digit frequencies,” and suggested that this law had to be universal—
regardless of what form the digits were in; that is, prices in dollars or
Drachma, or measurements in inches, cubits, or meters. Pinkham called this
universality “scale invariant” and was the first to show that Benford’s Law
is, indeed, scale invariant. It works both ways, too. If a law of digit
frequencies is scale invariant, it has to be Benford’s Law.
Further experimentation with Benford’s Law has been done on everything
from business statistics and annual turnover rates to fundamental physical
constants, but the law has some constraints.
Numbers cannot be random, as in lottery picks (sorry!), and cannot be overly
constrained where the range of possibilities is way too narrow. So while you
cannot pick the winning numbers for next week’s $50 million Power Lotto,
you could use Benford’s Law in other important ways.
Researchers are working on ways to use the law to detect fraud in tax returns
and financial data as well as other useful functions, such as checking
irregularities in clinical study trials and verifying demographic models.
Similar to all good things, the law does have specific limitations.
Although it cannot apply to certain sets of numbers, it is an intriguing
example of a mathematical formula that can be used to explain what might
appear to some as “mysterious circumstances” involving the appearance of
one digit over another in large sets of data.
Benford’s Law in Base 10 shows the percentage rate for each leading digit
from 1 to 9.
1–30.1 percent
6–6.7 percent
2–17.6 percent
7–5.8 percent
3–12.5 percent
8–5.1 percent
4–9.7 percent
9–4.6 percent
5–7.9 percent
LAWS, RULES, AND CONSTANTS
There are literally dozens of such laws and rules that use numbers to define,
categorize, and validate everything from computer processing to wide-scale
distribution to human behavior. We don’t have time to get into all of these in
one chapter, but, to name a few:
• Apery’s constant— A curious mathematical constant that arises in a variety
of physical problems. The number of known digits of Apery’s constant has
increased dramatically during the last decades due to the utilization of
computers and algo-rithmic enhancements.
• The Pareto Principle—named after economist Vilfredo Pareto, specifies
that 80 percent of consequences come from 20
percent of the causes, or an unequal relationship between inputs and outputs.
This principle serves as a general reminder that the relationship between
inputs and outputs is not balanced. The Pareto Principle is also known as the
Pareto Rule or the 80/20 Rule.
• Power Law— Any polynomial (a mathematical expression involving a sum
of powers in one or more variables multiplied by coefficients) relationship
that exhibits the scale invariance property; power laws are involved in a
huge number of natural patterns.
• Zipfs Law— Named for linguist George Zipf. It shows that the probability
of occurrence of words or other items starts high and then decreases by
tapering off. Thus, a few occur often while others occur rarely.
Again, these are just a few of the many laws, rules, and constants used in
science, computing, business, physics, and even the determination of
frequencies of particular earthquakes! Because this book deals so heavily
with number patterns and synchronicity, we did find some specific laws that
deal with things of a coincidental nature— things we often apply spiritual
and personal meaning to.
Remember Littlewood’s Law from chapter 7:7? The one that says each of us
can expect a miracle to occur in our lives at a rate of about one per month?
First published by Cambridge University professor J. E. Littlewood in A
Mathematician’s Miscellany , this law was initially developed to actually
debunk supernatural or paranormal claims about the phenomenon of
miracles. Littlewood’s Law is directly related to the Law of Truly Large
Numbers, which posits that when you get a sampling that is large enough,
anything can happen. Consider it the Murphy’s Law of Math.
Littlewood defines a miracle as “an exceptional event of special significance
occurring at a frequency of one in a million; during the hours in which a
human is awake and alert, a human will experience one thing per second (for
instance, seeing the computer screen, the keyboard, the mouse, the article,
and so on); additionally, a human is alert for about eight hours per day; and
as a result, a human will, in thirty-five days, have experienced, under these
suppositions, 1,008,000 things.” Accepting this definition of a miracle, one
can be expected to observe one miracle every thirty-five consecutive days or
so. Therefore, miracles may not be as miraculous as originally thought! With
so many people experiencing so many events throughout so many days, this
seems not only logical, but far less “paranormal” than we’ve been led to
believe by religious institutions that insist we have to beg, plead, and petition
for just one miracle in a lifetime.
Again, we can’t quite vouch for the effectiveness of this law in our own
lives, but the Law of Truly Large Numbers does allow for strange
coincidences, such as someone winning the lottery three times in a year. Yet
there have actually been multiple studies conducted that help explain how
this could easily happen. One of the most notable was conducted by
statisticians Stephen Samuels and George McCabe of Purdue University
after the New York Times ran a story of a woman who won the lottery twice,
against staggering odds. According to their research, the odds of someone
winning the lottery twice are actually about 1 in 30 in a four-month period,
and better odds throughout a seven-year period. Not staggering at all. This is
likely due to the fact that players tend to buy multiple tickets every week,
upping their odds of winning considerably.
With more than six billion people on this planet, the odds are actually high
that someone else, maybe even ten million someone elses, will be dreaming
of the exact same thing you are tonight. Perhaps they will be having the
same dinner. Or they share the same birth date. The larger the sample
number, the more frequently these “coincidences” seem to occur, which
appears astounding to us until we realize that just as many millions can share
the same event, they can also share the same “meaningful coincidence,” and
apply the same personal significance to that event.
Thus, according to Littlewood’s Law and the Law of Truly Large Numbers,
each of us should be experiencing some strange, coincidental events, some
even potentially miraculous, every single day.
This would no doubt include seeing 11:11 on the clock or noticing the
constant appearance of the number 23 throughout one’s day, especially when
our brains take the first few coincidences we experience and create patterns
around them, amplifying their importance and setting us up to see even more
and more of them. So, is this the explanation for the time prompt
phenomena?
COINCIDENCE
Coincidence is described by author David Marks in his book Psychology of
the Psychic as odd matches when two events occur that are perceived to
contain a similarity. But as we have seen, Littlewood’s Law and the Law of
Truly Large Numbers dictate that these odd matches should actually be
occurring all the time, just by the sheer size of our populace alone. Linked
events happen every day, and the claims of paranormal or conspiratorial
relationships may be overblown by the mere fact that life, and ultimately
history, as mathematical laws suggest, repeats itself all the time. Statistically,
coincidences must happen; they are inevitable.
Perhaps much of the reason humans apply so much meaning to these
coincidences comes from our tendency toward matrixing, seeking patterns
where there may or may not be any. If you recall, we talked briefly about the
concept of matrixing in a previous chapter, as well as pareidolia, the human
habit of looking for the familiar in the unfamiliar. We truly see and hear what
we either want to see and hear . . . or are biased towards seeing and hearing.
BIAS AND BELIEF
Ever have a spouse or loved one yell at you, “You only hear what you want
to hear”? May we have a show of hands? This is a prime example of
information bias in personal relationships— where we tend to tune out
details or ignore red flags. Described as an “error of History repeats itself.
That’s one of the things wrong with history .
—Clarence Darrow, U.S. defense lawyer (1857–1938) inductive inference,
or a form of selection bias toward confirmation of the hypothesis under
study or disconfirmation of an alternative hypothesis,” we have seen
confirmation bias in action in our paranormal research, from folks on both
sides of the fence. Believers shut out information that challenges their
beliefs. Skeptics shut out information that challenges their disbelief.
Also referred to in psychology and cognitive science as “belief bias,”
“selective thinking,” and “hypothesis locking,” this variety of preconceived
belief often lacks any supportive evidence, yet seems to again be related to
our brain’s ability to matrix and find relationships where none might really
exist. We are sure that by now you won’t be surprised to know that there is
even a Murphy’s Law of Research that states, “Enough research will tend to
support your theory!”
This is similar to the “polarization effect” in politics and involves the use of
evidence that can be described as neutral to shore up an established and
biased existing point of view. The polarization of red versus blue-state
beliefs is a perfect example of moving sides farther and farther apart as they
cling for dear life onto confirmation biases that they perceive to support their
beliefs. Again, we turn to the human brain and the five senses, which rapidly
evalu-ate information and then “choose sides,” so to speak, by filling in the
gaps of unavailable, or shaky, information with a preexisting subconscious
bias. Once the brain processes and accepts the bias as true, it becomes
incredibly difficult to shake that bias, even upon presentation of true and
valid information. Have you ever tried to convince a die-hard skeptic of
something— even with undeniable proof? It is usually like talking to a wall.
These same dynamics occur when we consider whether or not we “believe”
in psychics, ghosts, UFOs, and even whether we believe that numbers such
as 11:11 have mystical meanings and connotations.
Geneticist David Perkins coined the phrase “myside bias” to refer to
thinking “my” side of an argument is the correct one. This kind of thinking
can lead to all sorts of negative psychological traits such as delusion,
paranoia, and even self-aggrandization; however, here we are concerned
with whether or not these biases are placing false assumptions on
synchronistic events.
The tragic thing about these types of psychological biases is that even when
someone is handed pure proof of evidence to the contrary, the human will to
always “be right” usually kicks in, and we end up with often large groups of
people following false leads and buying into inaccurate assumptions. Again,
as paranormal researchers, we both see this happening every day, whether
with people refusing to think orbs are nothing more than airborne par-
ticulate matter, or rigid scientists refusing to acknowledge that millions of
people through time have seen ghosts, experienced time anomalies, or been
visited by angelic beings in the dead of night.
The only way we can really discern the magical properties of numbers, and
again, even Pythagoras and his ilk expounded upon them, is by suspending a
little disbelief. We must engage in a little controlled confirmation bias and
assume that behind the laws that seem to work with such precision— and
shock with stunning accuracy— there had to have been a mind, a truly
mathematical master genius, thinking all this stuff up.
Is God a number?
Chapter 10:10 IS GOD A NUMBER?
The great book of nature can be read only by those who know the language
in which it was written. And this language is mathematics. —Galileo
Is God a number? At first glance, this might appear to be a loaded question
that might elicit a similar response as to the question “Is God a male or
female?” Of course, because Western religious traditions already insist that
the answer to that controversial question is that God is male, let us attempt to
transcend personal belief, and study the inquiry from a socio-religious
perspective. Before doing so, however, it is important to recognize and
comprehend the underlying idea and concept of God. Mohandas
Karamchand Gandhi’s poem “The Meaning of God” is a beautiful sonnet
that describes God’s ever-present nature:
There is an indefinable mysterious Power that pervades everything.
I feel It, though I do not see It.
It is this unseen Power that makes Itself felt and yet defies all proof, because
It is so unlike all that I perceive through my senses.
It transcends the senses. . . .
That informing Power or Spirit is God. . . .
For I can see that in the midst of death life persists, in the midst of untruth
truth persists, in the midst of darkness light persists.
Hence I gather that God is Life, Truth, Light. He is love.
He is supreme good.
But he is no God who merely satisfies the intellect If He ever does.
God to be God must rule the heart and transform it.
—Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi
(Young India, October 11, 1928)
Nearly every culture on Earth believes in the existence of some type of
supreme higher power. From Yahweh to Yoda and the Force, the many
changing faces of God remind us of the need to put our faith and belief in a
bigger power that can watch over us, protect us, and guide us.
Although degrees of faith differ, the belief in “God” or a “Creator” is
ubiquitous. Mankind’s need for a foundational deity is universal, and it has
often been credited with the creation and destruction of whole cultures. The
“my God vs. your God” battle continues to this day, with no apparent end in
sight.
Those who do believe in a God, though, strive to describe or define it,
usually as an entity or figurehead and a deity that oversees the creation it
manifested from its own desire to express itself.
Omniscient, omnipotent, omnipresent— an all-encompassing force that,
according to cultural belief, is either benevolent like a loving father or
judgmental and harsh like a taskmaster.
Much has been written about various numbers that have been attributed to
God throughout the ages. Among others, the numbers 1, 7, 40, 66, 180, and
360 have all been ascribed to be holy numbers with sacred meaning. The
number 3, representing the triune nature of God, as well as the triune nature
of reality itself, is found in a variety of religious traditions and creation
myths, describing a three-fold nature to the creative force from which all
else manifests; the seen and the unseen.
However, the idea that God itself could be described in numeric form seems
almost blasphemous. To place divine power upon mere digits hints at heresy,
as well as the blending of science with religion, which many feel go together
about as well as oil and water. There do seem to be, though, certain numbers
that hint at a significance far beyond ordinary mortal numbers. Aside from
that, the creative force itself acts through various physical laws, and all laws
have a mathematical component that cannot be denied at the fountain.
CONSTANTS
In chapter 8:8, we examined the cosmological constants of the six numbers
that must be finely tuned to allow for life as we know it to exist. Add to this
the cosmological constant of the presence of dark energy, a force that
increases as the size of the universe increases, and we have measurable and
demonstrable values that make up for all the matter, or lack of it, in the
universe.
To fine-tune the physical constants present in the universe, including the four
fundamental forces of gravitation, electromagnetism, and the strong and
weak nuclear forces, as well as the ratio of electrons and protons present,
requires something, or someone, to do the tuning. Could it all be a random
accident that things worked out the way they did? Would that be easier to
believe than the concept of a higher master mathematician at play, working
out the equations that underlie the values that create stars, form galaxies, and
allow for the birth of the elements from which life is made?
Many of the past and present leading scientists believe there is a God behind
the number, if not a number behind the God. Here is a sampling of some
quotes we found, with sources.
• Fred Hoyle (British astrophysicist): “A common sense interpretation of the
facts suggests that a super intellect has monkeyed with physics, as well as
with chemistry and biology, and that there are no blind forces worth
speaking about in nature. The numbers one calculates from the facts seem to
me so overwhelming as to put this conclusion almost beyond
question.” (Wall Street Journal , “Science Resurrects God,” 12-27-97.)
• George Ellis (British astrophysicist): “Amazing fine tuning occurs in the
laws that make this [complexity] possible. Realization of the complexity of
what is accomplished makes it very difficult not to use the word miraculous
without taking a stand as to the ontological status of the word.” (“The
Anthropic Principle,” G. F. R. Ellis, 1993.)
• Paul Davies (British astrophysicist): “There is for me powerful evidence
that there is something going on behind it all. . . . It seems as though
somebody has fine-tuned nature’s numbers to make the universe. . . . The
impression of design is overwhelming.” ( The Cosmic Blueprint: New
Discoveries in Nature’s Creative Ability to Order the Universe , 1988.)
• Alan Sandage (winner of the Crawford Prize in astronomy): “I find it quite
improbable that such order came out of chaos. There has to be some
organizing principle. God to me is a mystery but is the explanation for the
miracle of existence, why there is something instead of nothing.” ( New York
Times , “Sizing Up the Cosmos,” 03-12-91.)
• Arno Penzias (Nobel Prize in physics): “Astronomy leads us to a unique
event, a universe which was created out of nothing, one with the very
delicate balance needed to provide exactly the conditions required to permit
life, and one which has an underlying (one might say ‘supernatural’) plan.” (
Cosmos, Bios, Theos , H. Margenau and R. A. Varghese, 1992.)
• Stephen Hawking (British astrophysicist): “Then we shall . . . be able to
take part in the discussion of the question of why it is that we and the
universe exist. If we find the answer to that, it would be the ultimate triumph
of human reason— for then we would know the mind of God.” ( A Brief
History of Time , 1988.)
• Alexander Polyakov (Soviet mathematician): “We know that nature is
described by the best of all possible mathematics because God created it.”
(“Fortune,” S. Gannes, 1986.)
• Ed Harrison (cosmologist): “Here is the cosmological proof of the
existence of God— the design argument of Paley— updated and refurbished.
The fine-tuning of the universe provides prima facie evidence of deistic
design. Take your choice: blind chance that requires multitudes of universes
or design that requires only one. . . . Many scientists, when they admit their
views, incline toward the teleological or design argument.”
(“Masks of the Universe,” E. Harrison, 1985.)
• Arthur L. Schawlow (professor of physics at Stanford University, 1981
Nobel Prize in physics): “It seems to me that when confronted with the
marvels of life and the universe, one must ask why and not just how. The
only possible answers are religious . . . I find a need for God in the universe
and in my own life.” ( Cosmos, Bios, Theos , Margenau and Varghese, 1992.)
• Wernher von Braun (pioneer rocket engineer): “I find it as difficult to
understand a scientist who does not acknowledge the presence of a superior
rationality behind the existence of the universe as it is to comprehend a
theologian who would deny the advances of science.” ( The Skeptical
Enquirer , T. McIver, 1986.)
Though not all scientists would agree, this is but a sampling of those who are
open to the presence of a higher force at play in the design of this finely
tuned mechanism we call our universe. Most do agree that there is a numeric
aspect, a degree of this fine-tuning required, and it can be described in
numeric terms. And if these numbers are off by even the slightest amount,
we cease to exist, or to ever have existed.
RUBIK’S CUBE
The numbers involved might be described better as the structure of the
universe. These numeric values define laws, how things work, how they
come about in the first place. We want to ask the questions: Is God a
number, too? And if so, what number?
One of the most amusing and curious quests to find God’s Number involves
a classic toy: the Rubik’s Cube. This little block of good fun requires the
player to try to solve the puzzle by getting all the same colors on the same
side of the cube. According to the World Cube Association website (yes,
there are Olympics for cubing), the world record for “cubing” is currently
3.47 seconds, set in 2019.
According to Northeastern University researchers, who attempted to find the
minimum number of moves possible to solve the cube (Ockham’s razor
meets Rubik’s Cube), there are more than 43 quintillion possible
arrangements to slush your way through.
But a doctorate student named Dan Kunkle, and a professor of computer
science named Gene Cooperman have announced that they found the “God
Number,” and it is 26. As part of a National Science Foundation grant, these
two men solved Rubik’s Cube in only 26 moves, what they call “God’s
Number,” because it is assumed that any omniscient being would intuitively
know the optimal steps required to solve any given configuration. (This
assumes God has time to play with cube toys.)
The two plan to whittle down that God’s Number, and they insist that the
number is not what is important. Rather, the concept of finding the simplest
and fastest way to solve a problem, with the use of technology, of course, as
a powerful overseeing creator might.
OTHER POSSIBILITIES
Cool toys aside, there just might be a more serious number associated with
the divine. The God numeral, according to physicist Scott Funkhouser, could
be an unimaginably big number, say 10^122, or 10 times itself 122 times.
This number seems to show up in some very critical cosmic instances,
appearing first in the late 1990s when scientists began researching the
presence of dark energy. This energy is believed to be behind the
accelerating rate of expansion we see in our universe. This same number,
albeit with a give-or-take of a factor of 10, appears in other important ratios,
such as the ratio of mass of the observable universe to that of the smallest
“quantum” of mass, which is 6 × 10^121; and one of the measurements of
entropy that determines the many ways particles in the current universe can
be spatially arranged, which is 2.5 × 10^122.
Again, even to see these common ratios show up five or six times is stunning
to most physicists and cosmologists. It seems highly unlikely that chance is
behind this repetition of ratios involving huge numbers, or that it’s akin to
rolling the dice and playing a huge game of cosmic craps. Sir James Joyce,
considered by many to be one of the founders of astrophysics, once wrote
that the universe seemed to him more like a great thought than a great
machine. This begs the question: Who or what is thinking the great thought?
TELEOLOGICAL ARGUMENT
This desire to find evidence of an existence of a creator or Godlike power in
the perceived order and design of nature is called a “teleological argument,”
or an “argument from design,” and is based upon the Greek word telos,
meaning “end” or “purpose.” The argument consists of four basic
components:
• Nature appears too orderly, complex, and purposeful to be random or
accidental.
• Nature must have been created by an intelligent, wise, and purposeful
entity.
• God is intelligent, wise, and purposeful.
• God exists, and nature is proof.
The problems arise, though, when the argument extends into a definition of
intelligence, and religious connotations become involved. In our discussion
of Information Theory, we looked at a theory that offers a compromise. The
universe looks ordered and purposeful because it is a giant computer
computing itself. Most people might not equate a computer with God, but
this theory allows for intelligent design behind the numbers and values that
make up our universe, as well as a non-religious sensibility. The tele ological
argument buys into the Anthropic Principle, which proposes that the finely
tuned constants are set to specifically allow for life as we know it; namely,
intelligent life that evolves into human beings.
The main forces behind the Anthropic Principle are John D. Barrow and
Frank J. Tipler, authors of The Anthropic Cosmological Principle . They
propose that the intricacy of design that leads to life is utterly improbable
and must be on purpose, compared to the vast and infinite range of possible
conditions that could have led to the opposite result: no life at all. But other
scientists argue that statistics could be manipulated to define a number of
natural situations that have that same level of improbability yet happened
anyway. Life may, then, not be as improbable as we think. Thus, maybe the
conditions that arose on earth as sustainable to life were quite simply luck . .
. just as picking a one in a million lottery ticket might be.
Proponents of the teleological argument must therefore prove that only
intelligent design, and not sheer luck, could account for a universe so
perfectly tuned and masterfully thought out, and opponents suggest that even
if there is an intelligent force behind this whole mathematically inclined
reality, it does not mean that designer is God. In the words of author Richard
Dawkins ( The God Delusion , The Blind Watchmaker ), it is only required
that the designer be at least as complex and purposeful as the designed
object.
This does not imply the designer is God, and French philosopher Voltaire
himself echoed this sentiment in his belief that the teleological argument
suggested a powerful intelligence, but not necessarily the most powerful one.
There is even argument over the nature of the designer itself.
According to Quentin Smith, author of the article “The Anthropic
Coincidences, Evil and the Disconfirmation of Theism”, we should not even
assume that the designer of any intelligent universe would be a good guy.
Instead, he warns us “it is reasonable to conclude that God does not exist,
since God is omnipotent, omniscient, and perfectly good and thereby would
not permit any gratuitous natural evil. But since gratuitous natural evils are
precisely what we would expect if a malevolent spirit created the universe . .
. if any spirit created the universe, it is malevolent.” The universe, Smith
argues, is a hostile environment indeed, with most of its conditions not at all
gently attuned to the emergence of life.
This hostility is evident even when examining the way nature works on our
own planet, with the survival of the fittest and the food chain. It’s not
necessarily a dog-eat-dog world, but it definitely is one where shark eats
fish, leopard eats gazelle, and humans eat whatever they fancy. On a more
macrocosmic level, the hostility of the environments on other planets do not
even lend themselves to life, and one can only imagine how difficult it
would be for anything to survive the extremes of heat and cold to be found
in the outer reaches of our universe.
A HIGHER NATURE
As the battle rages on over whether or not the universe was designed with
purpose, intent, and even intelligence, pitting science against religion in a
most current sense, there are compromises being offered between those who
walk in either world. Some scientists and religious leaders see no conflict
between the concepts of evolution and intelligent design, rather choosing to
view the existence of life on Earth as something potentially arising from a
creator-deity who utilizes evolution as the means of allowing life to unfold
and emerge and evolve.
With continued conflict and controversy surrounding the basic existence of
God, it would seem even more impossible to quantify the nature of God,
especially in mathematical terms. But numerologists and those involved with
Sacred Geometry think that there are sequences, such as the God Number of
112358134711, which speak of a higher and more profound nature. This
number, linked to the Kabbalah and the Fibonacci Sequence discussed
earlier, always comes back to the master number of 11. You start with the
number 1, and then add each number to the one before it to get the next
number. 0 + 1 = 1. 1 + 1 = 2. 2 + 1 = 3. 3 + 2 = 5. 5 + 3 = 8, and so on to 7 +
4 = 11, and then the whole thing repeats itself. Numerologists claim if you
add up the series of numbers 1123581347 (which we visited in an earlier
chapter), without the final 11, you get 8, the number of eternity and infinity,
and if you allow the 11 to repeat all the way to the end, you end on 10, the
divine number and a magical number rife with symbolism in the Kabbalah,
Gematria, and even the Tarot. While this speaks volumes to numerologists,
to others it seems as though any end number could be given some
mysterious, even divine, significance.
Christians point to the number 333 as being the number of God.
We recall 666 is the number of God’s adversary, the Beast of Revelation, the
anti-Christ of the Apocalypse. The number 333 is considered holy because
of the divine nature of the triune, tripled. The number 3, as presented in
earlier chapters, holds such a high place in the numerological hierarchy of
numbers, and tripling imbues it with a profound holiness and power. God
becomes “three times holy” as in Isaiah 6:3.
777
Perhaps the God Number exists far closer to home than the outer reaches of
an expanding universe. In the first chapter of this book, we looked at time
prompts and how they might be wake-up calls meant to, as one theory states,
activate our “junk DNA.” If the universe is a giant computer spitting out its
and bits of information to create reality, then our DNA is a personal
computer doing the same thing, only the its and bits it spits out make . . . us.
Others involved in Bible Code interpretation and sacred numbers in the Old
and New Testament suggest that perhaps God’s Number should be 777, the
triplicate of the divine and lucky number 7.
GEOMETRIC HARMONY
Author Sarah Voss writes in her book What Number Is God? Metaphors,
Metaphysics, Metamathematics, and the Nature of Things that the concept of
a divine number might be more metaphorical than literal. She agrees that all
of life is deeply imbued with the presence of sacred numbers, geometry, and
patterns, and that we might need to take a more metaphorical approach to
seeking a distinct divine numeric association with the higher intelligence
thought to be behind all of creation. She quotes Dutch mathematician B. L.
van der Waerden, in reference to the Pythagorean Greeks who revered
numbers as divine, as saying, “Mathematics formed a part of their religion.
Their doctrine proclaims that God has ordered the universe by means of
numbers. God is unity, the world a plurality, and it consists of contrasting
elements. It is harmony which restores unity to the contrasting parts and
which molds them into a cosmos. Harmony is divine. It consists of
numerical ratios.”
The geometric harmony spoken of, Voss continues, is present throughout the
physical world, in symmetries and proportions evident throughout nature.
These proportions are mirrors of the grander, greater macrocosmic reality,
symbols of the cosmos seen in the intricacies of a spiraled face of a flower or
a nautilus shell.
But she suggests that Pythagoras, Plato, and others may have been speaking
metaphorically when they described nature and natural laws in terms of
geometrical ratios and proportions. Yet many of the scientists of the past
have acknowledged that this link between macro and micro, between
numbers and nature, does also exist in a literal sense, even though it may
have been written about and philosophized about in more symbolic terms.
DNA
One of the most enduring symbols that suggest a higher intelligence instilled
in the structure of manifest reality is within our own bodies. DNA operates a
lot like a computer, and the human genome consists of the equivalent of 750
megabytes of information or data. A very small percentage of that data,
perhaps 3 percent, is involved in the composition of the 22,000-plus genes
that make each of us the person that we are. The other 97 percent is like a
blank hard drive, ready to be encoded with information to store in the
genome.
This non-coding DNA is often referred to as “junk DNA,” although in recent
years it has been determined to be anything but, both by the scientific
community and the metaphysical community.
A question on one intelligent-design website ( www.godandscience.org )
begs for more argument: “Why would a perfect God create flawed DNA
which is primarily composed of useless, non-coding regions?” Yet, as
mentioned earlier, God does indeed create flaws throughout nature— if we
interpret them as such. Maybe what we see as flaws are really all a part of a
bigger picture to which we are only given a tiny glimpse.
We look at the 3 percent of DNA that works with amazing and intricate
precision to create the elements of our bodies, from cells to major organs,
and then directs those elements in just the precise manner. To someone with
a religious bent, the fact that our bodies are mechanisms of the highest and
most profound design and order are Godlike enough. DNA makes each of us
who we are; unique expressions of life itself, yet in the most fundamental
way, all pretty much the same.
But it’s the junk stuff that interests those who experience time prompts, and
it’s the junk stuff that suggests there might be more to us humans than we
ever imagined, more to us than our blue eyes and brown hair and long legs
and crooked smiles. Most geneticists agree that the non-coding DNA is
necessary for the proper functioning of the coded DNA. They are just not
sure how. There are many theories as to why the non-coding DNA appears
inactive, even suggesting it provided no selective advantages or that it was
once a necessity and lost its coding ability somewhere along the way. Truth
is, it is still within us, and the quest is on to determine what it just might be
capable of doing if activated.
Also known as “secondary DNA,” many studies have shown that what we
thought was junk plays a functional role in the structure of the nucleus of a
cell, and that the amount of this non-coding DNA was directly proportional
to the size of the cell. Other studies showed that heterochromatin, once
believed to be junk DNA, actually has a role in suppressing genes, and that
actual gene expression during development is also related to non-coding
DNA. This DNA seems to have more functionality than ever imagined,
providing regulation of certain roles in the development and proper framing
of the translation of proteins. Further research is revealing even more
amazing functions of what was once thought to be dormant or inactive stuff,
and its role in making sure our metabolic system works as it should.
Humans aren’t the only holders of junk DNA. A study by David Haussler of
UC California, Santa Cruz, reported by the BBC, showed that humans, rats,
and mice share “many identical chunks of apparently ‘junk’ DNA.” The
team Haussler led compared the genome sequence of humans with that of
mice and rats, and they were literally astonished by the identical stretches of
DNA they found across the three species. Furthermore, they found that the
patterns matched closely with chickens, dogs, and fish sequences.
These “ultra-conserved elements” that did not seem to do anything of value
suggested that their function was indeed of great importance, most likely, as
Haussler stated, by controlling “the activity of indispensable genes and
embryo development.” The study led many scientists to rethink their opinion
of this junk stuff, prompting Professor Chris Ponting of the UK Medical
Research Council’s Functional Genetics Unit to state, “I think other bits of
‘junk’ DNA will turn out not to be junk. I think this is the tip of the iceberg,
and that there will be many more similar findings.”
For many people who experience time prompts, the theory is that the
awakening of a deeper consciousness and awareness is one of those findings
lying just beneath the tip of the iceberg. There is even a hint of a “language”
to this non-coding DNA, as pointed out in a Science magazine article by F.
Flam, which suggested that the sequence of the “syllables,” or the
nucleotides in DNA, should be completely random but are not. They in fact
have a striking parallel with human language and are now believed to
contain some kind of coded information. The authors of this paper, called
“Hints of a Language in Junk DNA,” actually employed a series of
linguistics tests to analyze the junk DNA and found amazing similarities to
human language. Again, the cry arose that there would be no beneficial
reason for an organism to carry around so many useless, junk molecules that
seemingly served no purpose. There must be a code. There must be a
purpose to that code. The quest is on to determine what that code is trying to
tell us, and how it will change us or transform us, once awakened into its full
capacity.
This code, and its purpose, is not yet fully understood in the science
community. But the spiritual community is hard on the case, suggesting that
this non-coding DNA is the home of psychic abilities, paranormal
manifestation, and higher levels of conscious awareness waiting to be
awakened in humankind. From seeing ghosts to being able to know what
another person is thinking, to locating a missing child using psi abilities, this
code might hold the key to the realm of the unknown that we have long
relegated to the fringes of science, or, better yet, the world of pseudoscience.
Though there is no physical evidence for this, many people feel strongly that
this part of the makeup of the human body is where the “key” to higher
levels of being lies, and that the door is a trigger event that will activate this
DNA and allow it to fulfill its purpose, thus allowing us as a species to fulfill
ours. This may also turn out to be the case for the other living species that
share with us the secret of junk, or unfulfilled, DNA. We may not be the
only ones ascending!
THE HERMETIC CODE
In his book The Hermetic Code in DNA: The Sacred Principles in the
Ordering of the Universe , Michael Hayes suggests there is a mathematical-
based code embedded throughout ancient religions and traditions and
science, a code that is mirrored in our own DNA structure. He calls it the
Hermetic Code, and states, “The Hermetic Code is much more than a
mathematical tool. It is a universal blueprint for all evolutionary or creative
development, and its distinctive inner symmetry is to be found in the
biomolecular and physical structures of all form of life.”
The Hermetic Code is based upon the “sixty-four word/twenty-two note
amino acid ‘scale of resonance’ but also, for example, in the overall
physiology of human beings with their three nerve complexes responsible
for sensation, emotion, and perception, and their eight sets of endocrine
transformers. . . .” Hayes, also the author of The Infinite Harmony , posits
that all living beings are “hermetically composed; they are all in their
relative scales evolutionary ‘triple octaves’ with the inherent potential to
achieve a state of ‘optimum resonance.’” It is this optimum resonant state
that many believe will be the result of our junk DNA being triggered into
activity.
Hayes also asks the important question of “who or what told DNA how to
behave?” His theory of an association between our DNA and a higher
mathematical code that shows symmetries between what goes on “above” in
the cosmos and what goes on “below” in our own physiology is behind the
idea that it is possible, through “transcendental evolution,” for human
individuals to emulate the living cell and to achieve a similar condition of
optimum resonance.
Though quick to admit that the evolution of DNA on earth has been a bit
dicey, and often erratic, Hayes states, “. . . underlying all this apparent
random, selective evolution is the symmetry of DNA and the genetic code”
and compares that symmetry to fundamental laws found in nature, especially
those found in harmonics that make up the “music” of life. The harmonic
ratios of music mirror the ordering principles of the universe . . . and our
own DNA. As above, so below . . . as if a “fundamental cosmic harmony”
was behind it all. And, of course, this harmony is based upon numbers.
He even quotes physicist Paul Davies, who said, “We can therefore regard
the spectrum of light from an atom as similar to the sound of a musical
instrument,” and takes it one step further by describing a range of musical
relationships between atoms and their components, even referring to the
theory of quantum chro-modynamics, which suggests that beneath the
material of an atom “there are other essentially musical symphonies being
played by nature.”
Anyone who has studied music theory knows of the prominence of
mathematics in scales, octaves, and such. According to Hayes, “The
Hermetic Code, as we know, is primarily an expression of the law of triple
creation, which holds that everything is composed of trinities within trinities.
This means that the three individual octaves embodied with pi are in
themselves triple octaves, making nine octaves in total, or sixty-four
‘notes’—precisely the number of RNA codon combinations.”
Okay, so God may be both a mathematician and a musician, not to mention a
geneticist and computer programming whiz! DNA molecules work with four
chemical components, known as bases of the genetic code, which construct
molecules known as RNA trip-let codons. Each of those comprises three
bases, serving as templates, Hayes explains, for the production of amino
acids, which in turn assemble into complex protein chains. All of this
follows the musical structure evident in the formula pi, and seen throughout
nature and the cosmos on an even grander scale. But Hayes also suggests
that this Hermetic Code is genetic, and that “certain fundamental aspects of
consciousness— ideas, concepts, revelations, and so forth— are
metaphysical genes and are produced in exactly the same way as are amino-
acid chains.”
This more metaphysical attribute to both non-coded DNA and the idea of a
higher intelligence behind man and nature alike is what those who
experience 11:11 time prompts believe will lead to a coming age of higher
reality. If DNA serves to evolve us physically, could the secrets it holds
within its own “King’s Chamber” serve to evolve us spiritually and
consciously as well? The concept of resonance, of the links between
vibration and levels of consciousness, cannot be ignored either. Are we all
on the cusp of a spiritual revolution that will be brought about by the
activation of our 97 percent non-coding DNA, where a Hermetic Code based
upon the fundamentals of music and harmony sits?
If the universe is indeed “one song,” maybe this is the song we are all about
to sing, once we all find our individual and collective voice.
BOND OF NUMBER
Throughout this book, it has been made clear that the underlying dynamics
of nature and even humanity is based upon mathematical laws. These laws
may make up part of the Theory of Everything sought after by physicists, yet
go one step further, as stated by John Michell in The Dimensions of Paradise
. Ancient scientific metaphysics had a similar but wider function. It
attempted to describe not merely the nature of the physical universe but
human nature also, and in the same terms, linking the two together as
macrocosmic and microcosmic aspects of the one primordial act of creation.
The universe, human nature, and the mind of the Creator were made
commensurable by number, which Plato called the “bond holding all things
together.”
This bond of number was seen in ancient traditions as being applicable to
both individual human existence and the greater design of the cosmos, and it
was just as functional and present in the DNA that makes us who we are as it
was in the fine-tuned structure of the planets and galaxies and stars. This
rather sacred concept, as Michell concludes, is a “synthesis of the
proportions and harmonies in the field of number, it depicts the essential
structure of the universe and the human mind alike. . . .” It describes the
dimensions of both a pyramid and the heavens themselves and dictates the
form of human and animal and plant, all according to a great and grand
design that includes both randomness, at times, and perfect order at others,
as part of a whole working to create life. Successfully, we might add!
Numbers influence us and govern our lives. They have their own power, and
that power just might be divine in nature. They shape the laws that shape us
and, amplified by the meaning we give them, make our reality real. God may
not be a particular digit, sequence, or even code. Instead, the creative and
intelligent foundation from which all reality springs forth appears to be
enamored of numbers, using them to shape the laws that shape form, matter,
and energy, and dictate the way things appear to be, seen and unseen, in this
and any other universe.
God is not a number. God is all numbers . . . and numbers are everything.
Chapter 11:11 WHY NUMBERS MATTER
I could never make out what those damn dots meant . . .
—Lord Randolph Churchill, on figuring out decimal points
When we began this book, neither of us truly had any idea just how
important numbers were. Of course we knew they played a role in our
everyday lives, especially when we pulled out our ATM card or checkbook,
dialed a critical phone number, or filled in our Social Security number on an
application. We were certainly aware of the proliferation of numbers all
around us. What we weren’t fully cog-nizant of was the magnitude.
Numbers literally are anywhere and everywhere.
Throughout our research and discussion with others, we came away with a
new appreciation for numbers, as well as a stunning discovery: numbers are
magical, and they matter. Sometimes more than we ever imagined. Numbers
have the power to shape, form, describe, manifest, and transform. Numbers
truly are the key to the universe.
Numbers have the power to transcend suffering and usher in a new era of
possibilities. But, similar to miracle diets or mail-order brides, there is a
catch.
In her book Numbers , written with David Boyle, Dame Anita Roddick
reminds us that “we are measured, counted, and recorded every time we buy
anything. We are summed up, averaged out and cross-sectioned by
academics and officials in surveys and screeds of government statistics that
suck us dry of our individuality. We are part of a gigantic experiment that
believes everything can be measured . . .” But Roddick did go on to
emphasize that numbers are magic— if, and only if, we remember that what
they quantify and represent is us. The measure of a man or a woman.
Humanity.
And therein lies the catch: The best things in life are not only free but
immeasurable. Love. Passion. Hope. Beauty. Goodness. Humor. Character.
Perhaps it is best to think of numbers the same way that we do the houses in
which we live. They provide a foundation and shelter within which we move
and live. They give us structure, familiarity, and a sense of home. Outside
their walls, we find those things to which only numbers can allude. The
mysteries of life that, when reduced to mathematical equations, suddenly
lose their mystery and mystique.
Thus, the question: With so much technological gadgetry at our disposal, and
our dependence on money, stock performances, dates, and times . . . with all
of our obsession with ages and years and breast size and waist width and
how many hairs remain on our heads, are we placing too much importance
on the numbers and not enough on the actual things they measure? Are we
forgetting about life itself?
For all of us who have had unusual experiences with numbers, especially
those mysterious and sometimes annoying time prompts, we need to
remember that it is not the digits themselves that matter, but what the digits
are alerting us to. Pay attention. Wake up. Take notice.
Seeing 11:11 on the clock day after day, night after night, is not coincidental.
It is not just a random event that miraculously keeps repeating. It happens
for a reason. Unfortunately, we still don’t know what that reason is.
As one woman so succinctly wrote on Angelscribe.com , “I have been
having some weird experiences with the 1111, 111, and others. I have been
noticing them for about a week now. It is so weird. I will look at the clock
and it’s 1:11. Today I was trying to change some properties on my web
browser and the file size was 1111 bytes! That was really weird. I went back
and looked again and it was different! Weird! I have seen a lot of the double
numbers and numbers with the 111’s. Obviously, someone is trying to tell
me something. I figure I will learn that something soon.”
Yes, we all may learn “that something” soon. Maybe, when we learn “that
something,” it will transform us and enlighten us, both individually and
collectively.
Whatever these time prompts mean, and whatever these strange signs,
sequences, or synchronicities are trying to tell us, the bottom line is, no
matter what the circumstances, we must pay attention to our lives. We must
live in the now.
Something or someone is trying to get us to look away from the cell phones,
computers, video games, and awful reality shows where we watch people
play out their own lives for the camera, while ignoring the sheer potentiality
of our own. It is truly incredible to think that the “someone” or “something”
may be an internal influence originating within our own brains, or perhaps it
is a subconscious poke in the side from some higher (or lower!) dimensional
being. Remember this the next time your cell phone rings or alerts you to a
text message.
The “who” or “what” matters not— the fact that we are being prompted in
the first place is the truly important facet of the equation.
Time prompts may be occurring in the life of every human being every day,
but not every human being pays the needed attention. With all of the
background noise and static in our lives, it’s quite probable that the vast
majority just aren’t aware because they have mentally “tuned” them out, just
as many of us tune out other synchronicities. The tragic thing is, by ignoring
these “higher” bits of potential information, we might be shooting ourselves
in the foot on a much grander scale. Do we live just for getting by in the
present, or with one eye on the future? Do we merely survive, or attempt to
thrive?
The fact that these time prompts happen to each of us in a per-sonalized and
individualized manner that holds a specific meaning is critical. Whatever is
behind this, brain or divine, it knows just what each of us needs to actually
wake up and take notice and will continue to prod and poke at us until we
do. Imagine millions of souls moving forward, each of them on a separate
path all their own, yet linked by an invisible cord.
The numbers behind the time prompts are the cord.
Appendix: NUMBER TRIVIA AND
ANOMALIES
Before we ended this book, we simply could not resist a little fun with
numbers. Because as mysterious and enigmatic as they are, they can also
bring out a gasp of awe or a chuckle or two. Following are some of the
amazing anomalies we found on the Internet and in other sources that show,
indeed, that there is more to numbers than originally meets the eye. Some of
the following information is anecdotal and should not be taken as absolute
fact.
0 TO 50—UNIQUE NUMBER FACTS
• 0 is the additive identity.
• 1 is the multiplicative identity.
• 2 is the only even prime.
• 3 is the number of spatial dimensions we live in.
• 4 is the smallest number of colors sufficient to color all planar maps.
• 5 is the number of Platonic solids.
• 6 is the smallest perfect number.
• 7 is the smallest number of faces of a regular polygon that is not
constructible by straightedge and compass.
• 8 is the largest cube in the Fibonacci sequence.
• 9 is the maximum number of cubes that are needed to sum to any positive
integer.
• 10 is the base of our number system.
• 11 is the largest known multiplicative persistence.
• 12 is the smallest abundant number.
• 13 is the number of Archimedian solids.
• 14 is the smallest number n with the property that there are no numbers
relatively prime to n smaller numbers.
• 15 is the smallest composite number n with the property that there is only
one group of order n.
• 16 is the only number of the form xy = yx with x and y different integers.
• 17 is the number of wallpaper groups.
• 18 is the only number (other than 0) that is twice the sum of its digits.
• 19 is the maximum number of fourth powers needed to sum to any number.
• 20 is the number of rooted trees with six vertices.
• 21 is the smallest number of distinct squares needed to tile a square.
• 22 is the number of partitions of eight.
• 23 is the smallest number of integer-sided boxes that tile a box so that no
two boxes share a common length.
• 24 is the largest number divisible by all numbers less than its square root.
• 25 is the smallest square that can be written as a sum of two squares.
• 26 is the only positive number to be directly between a square and a cube.
• 27 is the largest number that is the sum of the digits of its cube.
• 28 is the second perfect number.
• 29 is the seventh Lucas number.
• 30 is the largest number with the property that all smaller numbers
relatively prime to it are prime.
• 31 is a Mersenne prime.
• 32 is the smallest non-trivial fifth power.
• 33 is the largest number that is not a sum of distinct triangular numbers.
• 34 is the smallest number with the property that it and its neighbors have
the same number of divisors.
• 35 is the number of hexominoes.
• 36 is the smallest non-trivial number that is both square and triangular.
• 37 is the maximum number of fifth powers needed to sum to any number.
• 38 is the last Roman numeral when written lexicographically.
• 39 is the smallest number that has three different partitions into three parts
with the same product.
• 40 is the only number whose letters are in alphabetical order.
• 41 is a value of n so that x2 + x + n takes on prime values for x = 0, 1, 2, . .
. n-2.
• 42 is the fifth Catalan number.
• 43 is the number of sided seven-iamonds.
• 44 is the number of derangements of five items.
• 45 is a Kaprekar number.
• 46 is the number of different arrangements (up to rotation and reflection) of
nine non-attacking queens on a 9 × 9 chessboard.
• 47 is the largest number of cubes that cannot tile a cube.
• 48 is the smallest number with 10 divisors.
• 49 is the smallest number with the property that it and its neighbors are
squareful.
• 50 is the smallest number that can be written as the sum of two squares in
two ways.
MORE FUN FACTOIDS
• 123456787654321 is 11,111,111 multiplied by itself.
• On a bingo card of 90 numbers there are approximately 44 million possible
ways to make bingo.
• The number 2,520 can be divided by 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, and 10 without
having a fractional leftover.
• The chances of an exact duplication of fingerprints are about 64 billion to
1.
• The odds against a royal flush in poker are exactly 649,739 to 1.
• A sneeze can travel as fast as 100 miles per hour.
• If you had $10 billion in $1 bills and spent one every second, it would take
317 years to spend them all.
• Six eight-stud Lego pieces can be combined 102,981,500 ways.
• If you had 15 cubes numbered 1 to 15 and you tried to line them up in
every possible sequence, and if you made a change every minute, it would
take you 2,487,996 years to do it.
• Except for 2 and 3, every prime number will eventually become divisible
by 6 if you either add or subtract 1 from the number. For example, the
number 17, plus 1, is divisible by 6. The number 19, minus 1, is also
divisible by 6.
• If you were to go on vacation for 11 days, you’d have less than one million
seconds to enjoy it.
• The number of possible ways of playing just the first four moves on each
side in a game of chess is 318,979,564,000.
• There are 24 known “perfect” numbers. These are numbers that equal the
sum of all its divisors except itself. For instance, 6— the lowest of these
numbers— is divisible by 1, 2, or 3 and 1 + 2 + 3 = 6. The largest of the
known “perfect” numbers has 12,003 digits.
• The numbers on opposite sides of a die always add up to 7.
SPOOKY COINCIDENCES:
THE LINCOLN-KENNEDY LINKS
• Abraham Lincoln was elected to Congress in 1846.
• John F. Kennedy was elected to Congress in 1946.
• Abraham Lincoln was elected president in 1860.
• John F. Kennedy was elected president in 1960.
• Both were particularly concerned with civil rights.
• Both presidents were shot on a Friday.
• Both presidents were shot in the head.
• Lincoln’s secretary was named Kennedy.
• Kennedy’s secretary was named Lincoln.
• Both were assassinated by Southerners.
• Both were succeeded by Southerners named Johnson.
• Andrew Johnson, who succeeded Lincoln, was born in 1808.
• Lyndon Johnson, who succeeded Kennedy, was born in 1908.
• John Wilkes Booth, who assassinated Lincoln, was born in 1839.
• Lee Harvey Oswald, who assassinated Kennedy, was born in 1939.
• Both assassins were known by their three names.
• Both names are composed of 15 letters.
• Lincoln was shot at the theater named “Ford.”
• Kennedy was shot in a car called “Lincoln” made by Ford.
• Lincoln was shot in a theater, and his assassin ran and hid in a warehouse.
• Kennedy was shot from a warehouse, and his assassin ran and hid in a
theater.
• Booth and Oswald were assassinated before their trials.
• A week before Lincoln was shot, he was in Monroe, Maryland.
• A week before Kennedy was shot, he was with Marilyn Monroe.
• Lincoln’s name has seven letters.
• Kennedy’s name has seven letters.
• In Lincoln’s and Kennedy’s names the vowels and consonants fall in
exactly the same place; in the order c, v, c, c, v, c, c.
• War was thrust upon Lincoln almost immediately after inauguration.
• War was thrust upon Kennedy almost immediately after inauguration.
• Lincoln ordered the Treasury to print its own money.
• Kennedy ordered the Treasury to print its own money.
• International bankers may have arranged the assassinations of Lincoln and
Kennedy.
• Lincoln gave negroes freedom and legalized equality.
• Kennedy enforced equality for negroes.
• Lincoln delivered the Gettysburg Address on November 19, 1863.
• Kennedy was assassinated on November 22, 1963.
• Lincoln was sitting beside his wife when he was shot.
• Kennedy was sitting beside his wife when he was shot.
• Rathbone, who was with Lincoln when he was shot, was injured (by being
stabbed).
• Connally, who was with Kennedy when he was shot, was injured (by being
shot).
• Rathbone’s name has eight letters.
• Connally’s name has eight letters.
• Lincoln’s bodyguard was away from his post at the door of the president’s
box at the theatre.
• Kennedy’s bodyguards were away from their posts on the running-boards
of the president’s car.
• Lincoln didn’t die immediately after being shot.
• Kennedy didn’t die immediately after being shot.
• Lincoln and Kennedy died in places beginning with the initials P and H.
• Lincoln died in Petersen’s house.
• Kennedy died in Parkland Hospital.
• There were conspiracy theories that Johnson had knowledge-able about
Lincoln’s assassination.
• There were conspiracy theories that Johnson had knowledge-able about
Kennedy’s assassination.
• Days before it happened, Lincoln told his wife and friends about a dream
he’d had of being shot by an assassin.
• Hours before it happened, Kennedy told his wife and friends it would be
easy for an assassin to shoot him from a crowd.
• Shortly after Lincoln was shot, the telegraph system went down.
• Shortly after Kennedy was shot, the telephone system went down.
• Kennedy’s father had been the Ambassador to England at the Court of St.
James’s.
• Lincoln’s son became the Ambassador to England at the Court of St.
James’s.
• Lincoln’s wife tastefully and expensively redecorated the White House.
• Kennedy’s wife tastefully and expensively redecorated the White House.
• Lincoln loved great literature and could recite poetry by heart.
• Kennedy loved great literature and could recite poetry by heart.
• Lincoln had young children while living at the White House.
• Kennedy had young children while living at the White House.
• Lincoln’s sons had ponies they rode on the White House grounds.
• Kennedy’s daughter had a pony she rode on the White House grounds.
• Lincoln lost a child (12-year-old son) while president.
• Kennedy lost a child (newly born son) while president.
• Lincoln had two sons named Robert and Edward. Edward died young and
Robert lived on.
• Kennedy had two brothers named Robert and Edward. Robert died young
and Edward lived on.
• Lincoln’s funeral train traveled from Washington, DC, to New York.
• Kennedy’s brothers funeral train traveled from New York to Washington,
DC.
• The man running alongside Kennedy’s car snapping pictures with his
35mm camera was a salesman of Lincoln cars.
• Kennedy bought a Virginia home that was the 1861 Civil War headquarters
of Lincoln’s first general-in-chief, McClellan.
• Jefferson Davis was the name of the president of the Confed-erate states
while Lincoln was president of the Union states.
• Jefferson Davis Tippit was the name of the police officer killed allegedly
by Kennedy’s alleged assassin.
• Lincoln was sitting in a rocking chair at Ford’s Theater when he was shot.
• Kennedy had a special rocking chair he sat in at the White House.
• Henry Ford bought the rocking chair Lincoln died in and put it in his
museum in Dearborn.
• Kennedy’s seat in the Lincoln he was sitting in when he was shot is in
Ford’s museum.
• Lincoln’s seat in the Ford’s Theater he was sitting in when he was shot is in
Ford’s museum.
DYSCALCULIA— A NUMBER DISEASE?
Dyscalculia is a type of specific learning disability (SLD) involving innate
difficulty in learning or comprehending mathematics.
Dyscalculia is a lesser-known disability, similar and potentially related to
dyslexia and Developmental Dyspraxia. Dyscalculia occurs in people across
the whole IQ range, and sufferers often, but not always, also have difficulties
with time, measurement, and spatial reasoning. Current estimates suggest it
may affect about 5 percent of the population. Although some researchers
believe that dyscalculia necessarily implies mathematical reasoning
difficulties as well as difficulties with arithmetic operations, there is
evidence (especially from brain-damaged patients) that arithmetic (for
example, calculation and number fact memory) and mathematical (abstract
reasoning with numbers) abilities can be dissociated. That is (some
researchers argue), an individual might suffer arithmetic difficulties (or
dyscalculia) with no impairment of, or even giftedness in, abstract
mathematical reasoning abilities.
The word dyscalculia comes from Greek and Latin, which means: “counting
badly.” The prefix dys comes from Greek and means “badly.” Calculia
comes from the Latin “calculare” which means “to count.” That word
calculare again comes from “calculus,“ which means “pebble” or one of the
counters on an abacus.
Frequent difficulties with arithmetic, confusing the signs: +, -, ÷, and ×.
Other signs:
• Inability to tell which of two numbers is the larger.
• Difficulty with everyday tasks such as checking change and reading analog
clocks.
• Inability to comprehend financial planning or budgeting, sometimes even
at a basic level; for example, estimating the cost of the items in a shopping
basket or balancing a checkbook.
• Difficulty with times-tables, mental arithmetic, etc.
• Require logic rather than formulae, until a higher level requiring
calculations is obtained.
• Difficulty with conceptualizing time and judging the passing of time.
• Problems differentiating between left and right.
• Having a poor sense of direction (that is, north, south, east, and west),
potentially even with a compass.
• Difficulty navigating or mentally “turning” the map to face the current
direction rather than the common North = Top usage.
• Having difficulty mentally estimating the measurement of an object or
distance (for example, whether something is 10 or 20 feet [3 or 6 meters]
away).
• Inability to grasp and remember mathematical concepts, rules, formulae,
and sequences.
• An inability to read a sequence of numbers, or transposing them when
repeated, such as turning 56 into 65.
• Difficulty keeping score during games.
• Difficulty with games, such as poker, with more flexible rules for scoring.
• Difficulty in activities requiring sequential processing, from the physical
(such as dance steps) to the abstract (reading, writing, and signaling things in
the right order). May have trouble even with a calculator due to difficulties
in the process of feeding in variables.
• The condition may lead, in extreme cases, to a phobia of mathematics and
mathematical devices.
THE MOST USELESS FACTS IN MATH
• If you multiply 1089 by 9, you get 9801. It’s reversed itself! This also
works with 10989, 109989, 1099989, and so on.
• 1 is the only positive whole number that you can add to 1,000,000 that
gives you an answer that’s greater than if you multiply it by 1,000,000.
• 19 = 1 × 9 + 1 + 9 and 29 = 2 × 9 + 2 + 9. This also works for 39, 49, 59,
69, 79, 89, and 99.
• 2 is the only number that gives the same result added to itself as it does
multiplied by itself.
• If you multiply 21,978 by 4, it turns backward.
• There are 12,988,816 different ways to cover a chessboard with 32
dominoes.
• You can chop a big lump of cheese into a maximum of 93
pieces with 8 straight cuts.
• 1 ÷ 37 = 0.027027027 . . . and 1 ÷ 27 = 0.037037037 . . .
• 8 is the only cubed number that is 1 less than a squared number.
• To multiply 10,112,359,550,561,797,752,808,988,764,044,943,
820,224,719 by 9 you just move the 9 at the very end up to the front.
• The number 4 is the only number in the English language that is spelled
with the same number of letters as the number itself.
• 1 × 9 +2 = 11, 12 × 9 + 3 = 111, 123 × 9 + 4 = 1111, and so on.
WHAT ARE THE ODDS?
Sociologists have found that individuals typically have around 150 people
whom they regard as “close.” Therefore, each of us typically has an
entourage of around 23,000 “friends of a friend.” Then say we have about
five acquaintances for each close friend, the number swells to 600,000.
Fancy seeing you here! The chances of meeting someone on a train with
whom you share an acquaintance are therefore surprisingly high: for the
population in the United Kingdom, it’s around 1 in 100. If you also include
socioeconomic factors that boost the numbers of people from particular
backgrounds traveling by train to particular destinations, the chances rise
even higher. Take another “coincidence”: discovering you share the same
birthday as someone.
How big a gathering of people do you think you’d need to get odds better
than 50:50 that at least two shared the same birthday? As there are 365
possible birthdays, you might guess the answer to be about half of 365—
about 180 people. In fact, you need just 23.
This is because you’re not asking for a match between a specific birthday—
say, April 12th. All you want is a match between any two birthdays and any
two people. This reduces the numbers of people needed to produce the
“coincidence.” To find at least two people born on April 12th, you’d need
more than 250 people to give odds better than 50:50. The less specific you
are about what you want, the more likely coincidences become. There is
another effect at work behind some coincidences. They often seem
surprising because we mix up two different probabilities: (1) the chances of
something interesting happening; and (2) the chances of something
interesting happening after it has been given many opportunities to occur .
DO TRY THIS AT HOME
This is really strange. Try it! Get a calculator: 1. Key into the calculator the
first three digits of your phone number (the exchange, not the area code).
2. Multiply by 80.
3. Add 1.
4. Multiply by 250.
5. Add the last four digits of your phone number.
6. Add the last four digits of your phone number again.
7. Subtract 250.
8. Lastly, divide by 2.
Is this your phone number?
Bibliography
Barrau, Aurelien . “Physics in the Multiverse.” International Journal of
High-Energy Physics , November 2007.
Barrow, John D., and Frank J. Tipler. The Anthropic Cosmological Principle
. New York: Oxford University Press, 1986.
Belz-Merk, Dr. Martina. Counseling and Help for People with Unusual
Experiences a the Outpatient Clinic of the Psychological Institute at the
University of Freiburg . IGGP – Information and Counseling Services,
January 2007.
Bolton, Alain de. The Architecture of Happiness . New York: Vintage
International, 2008.
Boyle, David, and Anita Roddick. Numbers. White River Junction, Vermont:
Chelsea Green Publishing, 2004.
Cheiro, Count Louis Hamon. Cheiro’s Book of Numbers. London: Barrie &
Jenkins, 1978.
Davies, Paul. The Goldilocks Enigma: Why Is the Universe Just Right for
Life? New York: Mariner Books, 2008.
Dawkins, Richard. The God Delusion. New York: Houghton Mifflin, 2006.
Hahn, Thich Nhat. Living Buddha, Living Christ. New York: Riverhead
Books, 2007.
Haughton, Brian. Haunted Spaces, Sacred Places. Franklin Lakes, New
Jersey: New Page Books, 2008.
Hawking, Stephen. A Brief History of Time. New York: Bantam Dell
Publishing Group, 1988.
Hayes, Michael. The Hermetic Code in DNA: The Sacred Principles in the
Ordering of the Universe. Rochester, Vermont: Inner Traditions, 2008.
The Infinite Harmony. London: Weidenfeld & Nicholson, 1994.
Heath, Richard. Sacred Number and the Origins of Civilization. Rochester,
Vermont: Inner Traditions, 2007.
Hieronimus, Robert. The United Symbolism of America: Deciphering
Hidden Meanings in America’s Most Familiar Art, Architecture and Logos.
Franklin Lakes, New Jersey: New Page Books, 2008.
Ifrah, Georges. The Universal History of Numbers: From Prehistory to the
Invention of the Computer. New York: John Wiley and Sons, 2000.
Joseph, Frank, and Laura Beaudoin . Opening the Ark of the Covenant: The
Secret Power of the Ancients, The Knights Templar Connection, and the
Search for the Holy Grail. Franklin Lakes, New Jersey: New Page Books,
2007.
Jung, Carl J. Synchronicity: An Acausal Connecting Principle. New York:
Bollingen Foundation, 1960.
Kenyon, J. Douglas, et al. Forbidden Religion: Suppressed Heresies of the
West. Rochester, Vermont: Bear & Co., 2006.
Kenyon, J. Douglas, et al. Forbidden Science: From Ancient Technologies to
Free Energy. Rochester, Vermont: Bear & Co., 2006.
Kenyon, J. Douglas, et al . Forbidden History: Prehistoric Technologies,
Extraterrestrial Intervention and the Suppressed Origins of Civilization.
Rochester, Vermont: Bear & Co., 2005.
Kosminsky, Isidore. Numbers: Their Meaning and Magic. New York: Put-
tnam and Sons, 1927.
Lloyd, Seth. Programming the Universe: A Quantum Computer Scientist
Takes on the Cosmos. New York: Vintage, 2006.
Malkowski, Edward F. The Spiritual Technology of Ancient Egypt: Sacred
Science and the Mystery of Consciouness. Rochester, Vermont: Inner
Traditions, 2007.
McTaggart, Lynne. The Field: The Quest for the Secret Force in the
Universe. New York: HarperCollins, 2002.
Michell, John. The Dimensions of Paradise: Sacred Geometry, Ancient
Science and the Heavenly Order on Earth. Rochester, Vermont: Inner
Traditions, 2008.
Naudon, Paul. The Secret History of Freemasonry— Its Origins and
Connection to the Knights Templar. Rochester, Vermont: Inner Traditions,
1991.
Peat, F. David . Synchronicity: The Bridge Between Mind and Matter. New
York: Bantam New Age Books, 1987.
Rees, Martin. Just Six Numbers: The Deep Forces That Shape the Universe.
New York: Basic Books, 2000.
Roberts, Courtney . The Star of the Magi: The Mystery That Heralded the
Coming of Christ. Franklin Lakes, New Jersey: New Page Books, 2007.
Schwaller de Lubicz, R. A. Sacred Science . Rochester, Vermont: Inner
Traditions, 1988.
Szalavitz, Maia. “Your Brain on Math.” Time Magazine , April 23, 2013.
Talbot, Michael. The Holographic Universe. England: Grafton Books, 1991.
Voss, Sarah. What Number Is God? Metaphors, Metaphysics,
Metamathematics and the Nature of Things. New York: State University of
New York Press, 1995.
Watkins, Alfred. The Old Straight Track: Its Mounds, Beacons, Moats, Sites
and Mark Stones. Glastonbury, United Kingdom: Lost Library, 2013.
Westcott, W. W. Numbers: Their Occult Power and Mystic Virtue. England:
Theosophical Publishing House, reprint 1974.
About the Authors
Marie D. Jones has been involved with science, metaphysics, and the
paranormal for most of her life, which led to a fascination with quantum
physics and the writing of her popular and highly regarded book, PSIence:
How New Discoveries in Quantum Physics and New Science May Explain
the Existence of Paranormal Phenomena . Marie is also author of over
fifteen books in print on the paranormal, metaphysics, consciousness,
ancient knowledge, and unknown anomalies.
Marie began her extensive writing career as a teenager by writing movie and
video reviews for a variety of national magazines, as well as short stories,
including award-winning science fiction and speculative fiction for small
press genre and literary magazines. She is now a widely published author
with hundreds of credits to her name.
Her essays, articles, and stories have appeared in Chicken Soup for the
Working Woman’s Soul, Chicken Soup to Inspire a Woman, If Women Ruled
the World, God Allows U-Turns, UFO Magazine, The Book of Thoth,
Paranormal Magazine, Light Connection Magazine, Alternate Realities,
Unity Magazine, Whole Life Times, Science of Mind Magazine, and many
others.
Her background also includes more than fifteen years in the entertainment
industry as a promotions assistant for Warner Bros. Records, film production
assistant, and script reader for a variety of film and cable TV companies. She
is now a full-time writer with two middle-grade novels debuting in 2018 and
2019. She is also an optioned screenwriter and has her own production
company, “Where’s Lucy? Productions.”
In her capacity as an author and researcher, Marie has appeared at several
major conferences, including CPAK and the Queen Mary Ghost Hunting
Weekend. She has been interviewed on more than 100 radio talk shows
including Coast To Coast with George Noory, NPR, KPBS Radio,
Dreamland, and the Shirley MacLaine Show , and has been featured in
dozens of newspapers, magazines, and online publications all throughout the
world. She was also active with two MUFON groups during the 1990s as a
field investigator. She currently lives in San Diego, California, with her son,
Max.
Larry Flaxman has been actively involved in paranormal research and hands-
on field investigation for more than ten years and melds his technical,
scientific, and investigative backgrounds together for no-nonsense,
scientifically objective explanations regarding a variety of anomalous
phenomena. He is the president and senior researcher of ARPAST, the
Arkansas Paranormal and Anomalous Studies Team, which he founded in
February 2007. Under his leadership, ARPAST has become one of the
nation’s largest and most active paranormal research organizations, with
more than 150 members worldwide dedicated to conducting research into the
paranormal using the most stringent scientific methodology. ARPAST is also
now a proud member of the TAPS family (The Atlantic Paranormal Society).
Larry supervises a staff of fully trained researchers and more than $250,000
worth of top-of-the-line equipment. Widely respected for his expertise on the
proper use of equipment and techniques for conducting a solid investigation,
Larry also serves as technical advisor to several paranormal research groups
throughout the country.
Larry has appeared in numerous print interviews, including features in local
and regional newspapers, magazines, and online publications such as The
Anomalist , Times Herald News , Jacksonville Patriot , ParaWeb , Current
Affairs Herald , Unexplained Magazine , and The Pine Bluff Commercial .
He has been interviewed for several local and regional news television
outlets such as Ozarks First , as well as national cable television, most
recently appearing in a two-part special on ARPAST for MudTruck TV. He
has been interviewed on dozens of radio programs, including X-Zone ,
Ghostly Talk , Eerie Radio , Crossroads Paranormal , Binall of America ,
and Haunted Voices .
Larry has authored several published articles regarding science and the
paranormal, and is a regular columnist for The Paranormal Awareness
Society newsletter. He is also cocreator (with Marie D. Jones) of
ParaExplorers.com , devoted to the exploration of ancient and modern
unknown mysteries, and is developing a line of related books and products.
In addition, Larry is cocreator of the popular new ParaTracker software
program for documenting data from paranormal investigations. His own
ARPAST online research database system, SOCIUS, is considered one of the
most comprehensive in the field. His enthusiasm for education and training
in the paranormal field has also garnered many requests for special events
and seminars, including popular charity investigations at haunted locations
throughout the South, lectures on paranormal awareness for the
Breckenridge Movie Theatre chain, and Teen Technology Night at the Nixon
Library.
Larry also currently works in law enforcement/information technology. He is
married and lives in Little Rock, Arkansas.
Back Cover
If numbers are the language of the Universe, what are they saying to
you ?
Do you wake up every night and see 11:11 on the clock? Or 3:33? 4:44?
Does the same number sequence seem to appear throughout your life
over and over? Did you know that millions of people all over the world
experience the same phenomenon?
These mysterious number sequences, known as “time prompts”—which
we encounter regularly—seem like pure coincidence. But what if they
are actually messages from a higher source, like angels, guides, or even
the Universe itself, urging you to pay attention to something important?
This book explores the many theories about what these number
sequences are:
The newest speculation behind time prompts as messages from a
higher intelligence and their spiritual and metaphysical meanings
The science behind synchronicities, coincidences, and the
mathematical nature of reality
The archetypal symbolism of numbers and what they mean for you
“If you ever wondered about the repeated number sequences you see
and what they might be trying to tell you, Jones and Flaxman take you
on a roller-coaster ride through the levels of mind and consciousness.”
—Chellie Campbell, author of The Wealthy Spirit and Zero to
Zillionaire
“It’s all here, and it all begins with paying attention and noticing when
the clock reads 11:11.”
—Amy Leigh Mercree, medical intuitive, and bestselling author of A
Little Bit of Meditation Marie D. Jones is the bestselling author of
sixteen books. She has appeared on the History channel’s Ancient Aliens
and Nostradamus Effect television series. Visit her at
www.mariedjones.com.
Larry Flaxman is the bestselling author of nine books. He has appeared
on the Discovery channel’s Ghost Lab and the History channel’s
Ancient Aliens and Time Beings. Visit him online at www.
larryflaxman.com.
www.redwheelweiser.com
US$16.95
NEW
PAGE
11-11 cv mx.indd 1
8/27/19 4:02 PM